What do you think?
Rate this book
�son Ricos Porque Son Inteligentes?: Clase, Privilegio Y Aprendizaje En El Capitalismo
Explica las crecientes desigualdades de clase en Estados Unidos y los consiguientes conflictos, intensificados por la actual depresi�n global a fuego lento. Expone las justificaciones interesadas de una creciente capa de profesionales bien remunerados, quienes creen que su formaci�n y "brillantez" los califica para "regular" las vidas de las masas del pueblo trabajador, ya que no se puede confiar en que nosotros sepamos qu� nos conviene. En las batallas venideras que nos impondr�n los gobernantes capitalistas, dice Jack Barnes, los trabajadores empezaremos a transformarnos y a transformar nuestras actitudes hacia la vida, hacia el trabajo y entre nosotros mismos. Solo entonces descubriremos lo que valemos y qu� somos capaces de ser.
120 pages, Paperback
Published January 1, 2016
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
January 2, 2018
امان از ترجمه
July 7, 2019
Good lesson for mid class workers
July 29, 2026
هراء شيوعي
October 24, 2021
white man’s communism
June 30, 2023
Or Are They ‘Smart’ Because They’re Rich?
This simple question is always at the heart of politics, but more so today, because I believe that liberals and the “left” have become far more elitist than conservatives. All of the Wokery, cancel culture, identity politics, critical race theory, “gender” change, and other “political correctness” are not about fighting racism and sexism—they can’t be because they think these things are in people’s heads, not material conditions. They’re about proving one better than others, which is central to capitalist politics and culture. People in these circles are rating themselves and others by how victimized they are. But they’re all middle class, and none of them know what real oppression is. And they glorify victimhood, rather than organizing to fight against it. The #MeToo “movement” was an example of this, and a very dangerous one, since it eats away at what little is left of the concept of “innocent until proven guilty.”
I also suggest Labor, Nature, and the Evolution of Humanity: The Long View of History. And The Clintons' Anti-working-class Record: Why Washington Hates Working People.
The liberal response to the election of Donald Trump was hysterical. The idea that all the people who voted for him did so because they were racist was absurd. Did everyone who voted for Hillary Clinton want a new war? Many who voted for him had voted once or even twice for Obama, but they live in areas where the lifespan is falling, people don’t have jobs, many get addicted to painkillers because life is so miserable … that they couldn’t conceive of voting for the status quo.
Middle class liberals not only don’t suffer under these conditions, and they don’t know anyone who does. The cultural class gap is widening, and they won’t even consider talking to someone who voted for Trump—They applaud when such people are assaulted. They don’t support free speech; they want protection for themselves and those in their bubbles against “microaggression.” And worst of all, they hate the working class who they consider responsible for everything backward, and they condemn all white workers as “privileged” despite the fact that they themselves are far more privileged!
These are three essays by Socialist Workers Party leader Jack Barnes that were originally written for different purposes, but they fit together perfectly as an argument that this country needs to be ruled by a better class of people—the working class.
This simple question is always at the heart of politics, but more so today, because I believe that liberals and the “left” have become far more elitist than conservatives. All of the Wokery, cancel culture, identity politics, critical race theory, “gender” change, and other “political correctness” are not about fighting racism and sexism—they can’t be because they think these things are in people’s heads, not material conditions. They’re about proving one better than others, which is central to capitalist politics and culture. People in these circles are rating themselves and others by how victimized they are. But they’re all middle class, and none of them know what real oppression is. And they glorify victimhood, rather than organizing to fight against it. The #MeToo “movement” was an example of this, and a very dangerous one, since it eats away at what little is left of the concept of “innocent until proven guilty.”
I also suggest Labor, Nature, and the Evolution of Humanity: The Long View of History. And The Clintons' Anti-working-class Record: Why Washington Hates Working People.
The liberal response to the election of Donald Trump was hysterical. The idea that all the people who voted for him did so because they were racist was absurd. Did everyone who voted for Hillary Clinton want a new war? Many who voted for him had voted once or even twice for Obama, but they live in areas where the lifespan is falling, people don’t have jobs, many get addicted to painkillers because life is so miserable … that they couldn’t conceive of voting for the status quo.
Middle class liberals not only don’t suffer under these conditions, and they don’t know anyone who does. The cultural class gap is widening, and they won’t even consider talking to someone who voted for Trump—They applaud when such people are assaulted. They don’t support free speech; they want protection for themselves and those in their bubbles against “microaggression.” And worst of all, they hate the working class who they consider responsible for everything backward, and they condemn all white workers as “privileged” despite the fact that they themselves are far more privileged!
These are three essays by Socialist Workers Party leader Jack Barnes that were originally written for different purposes, but they fit together perfectly as an argument that this country needs to be ruled by a better class of people—the working class.
March 9, 2020
Compré este libro corto en una feria de libros (Chicago Lit Fest) hace seis meses. Primero, quiero aclarar que yo soy más izquierdista que conservador, pero lo he leído, y puedo decir que es algo aburrido, con el autor recorriendo los mismos temas izquierdistas y cansados. Hay un buen argumento o dos, pero más que nada, el autor no parece ofrecer soluciones concretas en cuanto a la batalla de clases sociales en los Estados Unidos.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews