The 10 rules of successful nations
What goes into making a successful economy? Is there a pattern to the rise and fall of an economy? Does history offer any clues to booms and busts that economists try to predict, mostly with little success? Are markets more efficient in sniffing out a crisis?
Indian investor and fund manager Ruchir Sharma, who has written three books on related subjects in this decade, lists 10 rules behind successful economies in his new book, an abridged version of his 'The Rise And Fall of Nations: Forces Of Change In A Post-Crisis World' published in 2016. He has analysed data on fifty-six postwar economies that recorded a growth of 6% or more for a decade.
Sharma makes it clear that rarely do countries score highly on all the ten rules. But the rules give a broad idea on where to look for the next big thing.
Here are the ten rules in brief:
Population
The author thinks that the working age population is a major factor, accounting for 50% of economic growth. A 1 % decline in the working age population can cut growth by 1 percentage point, as it became evident in the last fifteen years. While a nation may have a sizeable young working force, it is important to see if its government is taking advantage of it.
What is worrying is that workforces even in countries like China and India have been shrinking in the recent years due to a fall in fertility rates. The population growth is expected to come down from 2%to 1% after 2020 and the trend will continue throughout this century, according to the United Nations.
But population without investments and job opportunities can only be a burden and create unrest, as the Arab Spring revolts proved. India has enough workers, but not enough work.
Politics
Democrats have been better than aristocrats for the economy in the last three decades, and those with a mass following and fresh to power served as agents of change than obstacle, says the author. Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and Vladimir Putin of Russia in their earlier stints and Ronald Regan in the first term are some of the examples. In contrast, Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore kept pushing for reforms all through his reign over three decades.
Inequality
Inequality is a choker of growth. Between 2009 and 2019, the number of billionaires in the world doubled, from 1,011 to 2,153, with their combined wealth rising from $3.6 trillion to $8.7 trillion. In India, the top ten Indian tycoons control 12% of GDP, compared to 1% in China. In Russia, 100 billionaires control 26% of GDP. As per 2019 data on the emerging economies, the billionaire share of wealth came close to 15% only in India and Taiwan.
Sharma makes a distinction between “good billionaires” and “bad billionaires”. The latter make money from rent-seeking industries like mining and real estate, while “good billionaires”make money from manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and technology. In South Korea only 6% of wealth comes from rent-seeking industries. The proportion of “bad billionaires” in the emerging economies today is close to 30%.
State power
The debate over the ideal size of the government in an economy is as old as capitalism. Sharma’s answer is that a successful nation has the right-sized government. What is more important is where and how the government is spending its money and whether its policies hamper the growth of the private sector.
Among developed economies, the French government spends 56% of GDP,which is 18% above the 39% average, driving up taxes and businesses out of the country. The U.S., Austria and Australia spend about 35% to 40%.
Citing the example of India not respecting its law on capping the budget deficit to 3% of GDP, the author says governments that don’t take budget deficits seriously do disservice to growth. Likewise, governments that meddle with state-owned companies and banks to control inflation run up debts. For instance, Russia notoriously allowed oligarchs to take over well-run private companies, while Poland, which ditched communism at the same time Russia did, followed Western European countries in nurturing the private sector.
Geography
The rise of incomes in 1500 in Europe is attributed to its location and good policies. Nations that build infrastructure to connect with distant economies and trade ties with its neighbours invest in growth. China is a role model in building ports and harbours to boost its exports. Its ambitious Belt and Road initiative is an example of how a nation could make the most of its geographical advantage. Vietnam, which was struggling in the last decade, is the most recent example of a nation using its trade routes to boost its economy.
Another way of exploiting one's geographical advantage is promoting trade in its neighbourhood. The economic miracles wrought by Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China are attributed to the trade deals they struck. In contrast, South Asian countries like India, Pakistan and Bangladesh are hampered by lingering hostilities.
Investment
Another major factor determining growth is investment. Going by the author’s list of successful fifty-six countries, their 6% decadal growth was due to an investment of 25% of the GDP. Countries like Brazil, Nigeria and Mexico stagnated when their investments were less than 20% of the GDP. For developed countries, it can be lower, as infrastructure for growth is already in place.
The author makes a distinction between good investment binges and bad ones. Spending on technology, infrastructure and manufacturing boosts growth and leaves behind assets like factories, fibre-optic cables and railroads. In the nineteenth century, the railroad project in the US led to booms and busts, but eventually enabled the nation to emerge as an industrial powerhouse.
On the other hand, bad investments in real estate and commodities production, after a good run, leave behind debts. China initially invested heavily in factories, roads and bridges, which turned out to be productive assets. Later, it put its money in real estate, which ended in wasteful expenditure.
The author’s contention is that before the global financial crisis, India chose to invest in technology with the hope of taking the service escalator to prosperity. It concentrated on the Information Technology services and neglected the manufacturing sector. A decade later, India remains a back-office operations centre, whereas countries like China, Thailand and South Korea, which focused also on manufacturing exports, progressed at a healthy pace.
Inflation
Developed economies that manage inflation at 2% and emerging economies at 4% avoid crisis. High inflation is a threat to growth. Low inflation can slip into deflation, as it happened in Japan. But low inflation could be a result of the discovery of a new tech or innovation of a financial product, which leads to growth. History shows that while inflation is bad for the economy, deflation has coexisted with growth.
Currency
Cheap currency is fine as long as it is stable and does not trigger a crisis. But cheapening currency can raise foreign debt if the nation is not exporting enough. An expensive currency can create a current account deficit, draining its foreign reserves, as it happened in Thailand in 1990s.
Debt
A country where private sector debt grows faster than the economy for five straight years is heading for a crisis. Again Thailand is an example where everyone was afflicted by a debt mania in the 1990s. A nation can recover from a crisis if private credit grows slower than its economy. But a slowdown in credit growth can lead to debtophobia.
According to the author's research when private debt exceeds 40 percentage points of GDP, it is a sign of a crisis coming. After the crisis, if debts fall too sharply, it can paralyse the economy.
So, the message is avoid debt mania as well as debtophobia.
Sharma compares three countries to show how debt management makes a difference to the economy. In 1992, when Taiwan was hit by a crisis, it minimised the role of state banks in lending and investing in projects and encouraged private banks in the business. The economy shrank, but only from 9 % to 7%. Whereas Japan, following a crisis in the same decade, bailed out its private banks and took on the burden of debt and ended up with a 405 % debt-GDP ratio. Its GDP fell to 1% from 5%. In 2019, the Japanese economy was less than one third of what it would have been had it maintained its growth of the 1980s. The author warns China could face a similar scenario if it continues to sustain its boom with debt.
Hype
The author's last rule addresses the perils of economic forecasting. Sharma contends that the media often senses the big changes late and economists and international agencies like the IMF have been simplistic in their forecasts. Analysts at the IMF predicted that emerging economies like Brazil, India and China, which saw their growth more than double with an average rate over 7% after 2002 , would have an average income almost equal to the developed world. But the average growth in the emerging markets fell to 4%.
In 2011, 'Time' magazine carried a story whether this is China's century or India's, when the emerging economies were actually slowing down. An economy's good run or bad times don't last too long. Also, crisis-hit economies that the media ignores slowly re-emerge as success stories.
After the 2008 crisis, the economy has been marked by four Ds - depopulation, declining productivity, deglobalisation and growing debt. Any forecast for a period beyond five years is foolhardy, cautions the author.
S. Radha Krishnan