What do you think?
Rate this book
The French Mistress
From the author of The King's Favorite -a new novel based on a dazzling and decadent true story of Restoration England.
The daughter of a poor nobleman, Louise leaves the French countryside for the court of King Louis XIV, where she must not only please the tastes of the jaded king, but serve as a spy for France. With few friends, many rivals, and ever-shifting loyalties, Louise learns the perils of her new role. Yet she is too ambitious to be a pawn in the intrigues of others. With the promise of riches, power, and even the love of a king, Louise creates her own destiny in a dance of intrigue between two monarchs-and two countries.
The daughter of a poor nobleman, Louise leaves the French countryside for the court of King Louis XIV, where she must not only please the tastes of the jaded king, but serve as a spy for France. With few friends, many rivals, and ever-shifting loyalties, Louise learns the perils of her new role. Yet she is too ambitious to be a pawn in the intrigues of others. With the promise of riches, power, and even the love of a king, Louise creates her own destiny in a dance of intrigue between two monarchs-and two countries.
377 pages, Paperback
First published May 22, 2009
30 people are currently reading
1372 people want to read
About the author
Susan Holloway Scott
9 books792 followersAka Miranda Jarrett
Aka Isabella Bradford
Susan Holloway Scott is the author of over fifty historical novels and historical romances. Writing under several pen names, she has received numerous awards and honors for her bestselling books. With more than three million copies of her books in print, she has been published in nineteen foreign countries around the world and translated into fourteen different languages.
Susan has also written as half of the Two Nerdy History Girls (twonerdyhistorygirls.com), a popular book & history blog with a worldwide following. Follow her on Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/susan_hollo...) and Twitter (https://twitter.com/2nerdyhistgirls). She is a graduate of Brown University, and lives with her family outside of Philadelphia, PA.
Aka Isabella Bradford
Susan Holloway Scott is the author of over fifty historical novels and historical romances. Writing under several pen names, she has received numerous awards and honors for her bestselling books. With more than three million copies of her books in print, she has been published in nineteen foreign countries around the world and translated into fourteen different languages.
Susan has also written as half of the Two Nerdy History Girls (twonerdyhistorygirls.com), a popular book & history blog with a worldwide following. Follow her on Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/susan_hollo...) and Twitter (https://twitter.com/2nerdyhistgirls). She is a graduate of Brown University, and lives with her family outside of Philadelphia, PA.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 48 reviews
May 6, 2014
The legacy of King Charles II is one which includes many mistresses and a parade of bastard children. Each mistress brought a unique upbringing and personality to the royal table; allowing modern-day supporters to choose a ‘favorite’. Having previously focused on both Nell Gwynne and Barbara Villiers; Susan Holloway Scott turns to Louise de Keroualle in, “The French Mistress: A Novel of the Duchess of Portsmouth and King Charles II”.
“The French Mistress” is guilty of initial pages best described as slow and uneventful, with too much ‘talking’ versus ‘living’. Scott follow a strong, “As you know, Bob”-style to discuss the historical environment which is great in terms of the “The French Mistress” having strong period credibility; but the plot seems nonexistent and drags. In line with this historical context, however, Scott’s prose is beautiful with its literary sensibilities and accuracy in the speech styles of the era. The imagery is vivid, colorful, and natural.
The first portion of “The French Mistress” focuses on the time Louise spent in the French Court as a lady in Minette’s household (the sister of Charles II). Being that there aren’t many books available on either Louise or Minette; it is quite refreshing to have a strong focus on their roles. The problem with this is that Louise does not have much to add to the story. Thus, she instead always happens to overhear conversations or be “in the right place, at the right time” to infiltrate both personal and political information. Not only is this unbelievable, but it also becomes tedious. Plus, Louise’s characterization is too apologetic with a portrayal of an angelic maiden (albeit, one who speaks of herself in pure conceit and compliment).
As expected, “The French Mistress” picks up pace when Charles II is introduced, on approximately page 130. At this point, the story begins to have more substance and excitement while Louise finally begins to fill out and show some personality; therefore, growing more of a connection with the reader. It is also interesting to experience Louise’s views, as she was a side-character in Scott’s other novels depicting the mistresses of Charles II.
Despite a better story with the entrance of Charles; “The French Mistress” still doesn’t fair much better. Simply, the novel is somewhat boring and nothing of note or interest plays out. There seems to be no point or build-up and therefore no anticipation or suspense. “The French Mistress” isn’t terrible; it is just not compelling enough.
Equally disappointing, is Scott’s exclusion of any focus on the interaction between the many mistresses of Charles II. This is usually the ‘juicy’ highlight in the novels on the subject but it is mostly absent in “The French Mistress” with the exception of a few cases (which aren’t even wholly accurate). On the other hand, Scott arcs Louise to become greedier and more spoiled both in material goods and mannerisms showing the behaviors Louise was known for.
The concluding chapters of “The French Mistress” are overly rushed. So much so, in fact, that one chapter to the next progresses the story by almost a decade. The ending is also abrupt, leaving unanswered questions and not enough emotion. As usual with Scott, her ‘Author’s Note’ is more in-depth than her novel.
“The French Mistress” lacks a proper growth/arc, maintains a slow pace, doesn’t have much of a point, and employs no climax. Yet, it is refreshing to read the viewpoint of Louise de Keroualle outside of her usual stereotype. Although “The French Mistress” isn’t riveting; it isn’t horrible and is suggested for those readers interested in Charles II, his mistresses, and Restoration England.
“The French Mistress” is guilty of initial pages best described as slow and uneventful, with too much ‘talking’ versus ‘living’. Scott follow a strong, “As you know, Bob”-style to discuss the historical environment which is great in terms of the “The French Mistress” having strong period credibility; but the plot seems nonexistent and drags. In line with this historical context, however, Scott’s prose is beautiful with its literary sensibilities and accuracy in the speech styles of the era. The imagery is vivid, colorful, and natural.
The first portion of “The French Mistress” focuses on the time Louise spent in the French Court as a lady in Minette’s household (the sister of Charles II). Being that there aren’t many books available on either Louise or Minette; it is quite refreshing to have a strong focus on their roles. The problem with this is that Louise does not have much to add to the story. Thus, she instead always happens to overhear conversations or be “in the right place, at the right time” to infiltrate both personal and political information. Not only is this unbelievable, but it also becomes tedious. Plus, Louise’s characterization is too apologetic with a portrayal of an angelic maiden (albeit, one who speaks of herself in pure conceit and compliment).
As expected, “The French Mistress” picks up pace when Charles II is introduced, on approximately page 130. At this point, the story begins to have more substance and excitement while Louise finally begins to fill out and show some personality; therefore, growing more of a connection with the reader. It is also interesting to experience Louise’s views, as she was a side-character in Scott’s other novels depicting the mistresses of Charles II.
Despite a better story with the entrance of Charles; “The French Mistress” still doesn’t fair much better. Simply, the novel is somewhat boring and nothing of note or interest plays out. There seems to be no point or build-up and therefore no anticipation or suspense. “The French Mistress” isn’t terrible; it is just not compelling enough.
Equally disappointing, is Scott’s exclusion of any focus on the interaction between the many mistresses of Charles II. This is usually the ‘juicy’ highlight in the novels on the subject but it is mostly absent in “The French Mistress” with the exception of a few cases (which aren’t even wholly accurate). On the other hand, Scott arcs Louise to become greedier and more spoiled both in material goods and mannerisms showing the behaviors Louise was known for.
The concluding chapters of “The French Mistress” are overly rushed. So much so, in fact, that one chapter to the next progresses the story by almost a decade. The ending is also abrupt, leaving unanswered questions and not enough emotion. As usual with Scott, her ‘Author’s Note’ is more in-depth than her novel.
“The French Mistress” lacks a proper growth/arc, maintains a slow pace, doesn’t have much of a point, and employs no climax. Yet, it is refreshing to read the viewpoint of Louise de Keroualle outside of her usual stereotype. Although “The French Mistress” isn’t riveting; it isn’t horrible and is suggested for those readers interested in Charles II, his mistresses, and Restoration England.
July 25, 2009
Did I read a different book again? Oh well. The French Mistress is I believe the third book written by Holloway Scott recounting the lives of mistresses of Charles II of England. Louise de Kérouaille is sent to the French court to serve as maid of honor to Charles' sister Henriette-Anne, sister-in-law to Louis XIV. Louise serves her mistress faithfully and during Henriette's visit to England she catches the roving eye of Charles II, but has to return to France with her mistress. Henriette soon dies mysteriously and Louise is sent to England to seduce Charles and provide political information to the French King. While keeping Charles at arm's length for a time, she eventually becomes Charles' favorite mistress (albeit not his only one) and is able to juggle life amidst the hatred of the English for anything French and Catholic, the intrigues of the English court, as well as her love for Charles while remaining loyal to Louis.
Well, that all sounds great and very much like the kind of book I love getting permanently lost in so why am I giving it three stars? I very much enjoyed the first part of the book while Louise was at the French Court in service to Henriette, as well as the first visit to England and the attraction between her and Charles. That said, it was well into two-thirds of the way through before Louise and Charles finally consummate their relationship and it then seemed the author found herself rushing to finish Louise's story and keep it under 400 pages.
The first person narrative didn't work well for me, it really seemed to limit the way the author conveyed Louise's story, whether from putting her into contrived situations just so she could "witness" Henriette's being abused by her husband to the last 100 or so pages where's she's dryly (very dryly I might add) recounting Charles's political difficulties with Parliament, the Dutch and the matter of his succession. I prefer to see the action rather than have someone else tell me about it. The other problem with the first person narrative in this book was instead of someone else commenting to Louise on her generous bosom/creamy neck/beguiling eyes it was Louise giving herself those compliments. Who knows, perhaps that was intentional to remind us that Louise what a self-centered vain young miss she was? Lastly, and perhaps I'm forever spoiled and will always judge any book in Restoration England against Kathleen Winsor's wonderful romp Forever Amber, this one just wasn't bawdy enough somehow - it wasn't "fun". If you're not sure get it from the library first, then buy it if you love it.
Well, that all sounds great and very much like the kind of book I love getting permanently lost in so why am I giving it three stars? I very much enjoyed the first part of the book while Louise was at the French Court in service to Henriette, as well as the first visit to England and the attraction between her and Charles. That said, it was well into two-thirds of the way through before Louise and Charles finally consummate their relationship and it then seemed the author found herself rushing to finish Louise's story and keep it under 400 pages.
The first person narrative didn't work well for me, it really seemed to limit the way the author conveyed Louise's story, whether from putting her into contrived situations just so she could "witness" Henriette's being abused by her husband to the last 100 or so pages where's she's dryly (very dryly I might add) recounting Charles's political difficulties with Parliament, the Dutch and the matter of his succession. I prefer to see the action rather than have someone else tell me about it. The other problem with the first person narrative in this book was instead of someone else commenting to Louise on her generous bosom/creamy neck/beguiling eyes it was Louise giving herself those compliments. Who knows, perhaps that was intentional to remind us that Louise what a self-centered vain young miss she was? Lastly, and perhaps I'm forever spoiled and will always judge any book in Restoration England against Kathleen Winsor's wonderful romp Forever Amber, this one just wasn't bawdy enough somehow - it wasn't "fun". If you're not sure get it from the library first, then buy it if you love it.
October 10, 2009
Full Review Link
As Louise de Keroualle bids her family farewell and travels to Paris to become a maid of honor, she never suspects her pivotal role in the courts of kings. Louise’s mission is to secure a husband to bolster her family’s standing and dwindling fortune, but she finds herself and her particular brand of innocent beauty out of fashion in the jaded court of Louis XIV – and unwilling to participate in games and affairs of the nobility, Louise is overlooked. Because of her innocence and fresh-faced honesty, however, Louise quickly becomes Madame’s – Henriette-Anne, Duchess of d’Orleans and sister of King Charles II of England – closest and most trusted maid, friend, and confidante. Madame yearns for her brother and for her homeland, and works tirelessly at bringing France and England together despite the cruelty and disdain of her husband, King Louis’s brother. When Madame finally is granted her dearest wish to visit England with King Louis’s blessing, her first in ten years, the dependable Louise is by her Madame’s side. Almost instantly, King Charles is taken with Louise, as much for her beauty and innocence as for his sister’s high esteem. As for Louise, she had already slowly idealized Charles from her Lady’s stories and letters, and the infatuation quickly progresses to love in Charles’s dashing presence. Though Charles attempts to keep Louise for his own, Madame intervenes and refuses to leave her friend in England, for the good of Louise and for her brother. However, after the sudden death of Madame upon their return to Paris, Louise has a singular opportunity offered to her by King Louis: return to England as Charles’s mistress with the best interests of France in mind, assuming the late Henriette’s role as liaison between the two countries. And Louise, already in love and yearning for a future of her own, accepts and becomes Charles’s French mistress, rising above the cruelty of the English court and becoming one of the most powerful and rich women in the nation.
I have to admit that I started Louise’s story with strong bias – I had fallen in love with the witty Nell Gwyn from The King’s Favorite, Louise’s bitter rival. As such, when I began The French Mistress I found myself criticizing Louise with Nell’s mocking voice in my head. However, once I forced myself to give Louise a fair shot and to relinquish my scorn, I found her story captivating, and her narration (though not nearly so fun and sparkling as Nelly’s) strong in its own right. The French Mistress is Ms. Scott’s gift to the memory of Louise de Keroualle; a chance for the French mistress of the English King to tell her story, against the malicious rumors and prejudice against her and which indeed remain in historical memory. And though Nell will always be my favorite, Louise holds her own.
Louise de Keroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth
The French Mistress paints Louise de Keroualle in a sympathetic light; and her aloofness at court and unpopularity are explained by her natural shyness, her different upbringing as a virgin and innocent out of place with the bawdy humor of the English court, and her background as a devout Catholic in a country loathsome of “popish” tendencies. For all Nell’s wit and charm, Louise is of noble blood and birth, and unlike Nell achieves the rank of Duchess despite her unpopularity and the barbs directed at her from Nell and others (such as Nell’s good friend and major character in the previous book, the Earl of Rochester).
As with her prior book, Ms. Scott excels in creating a distinct voice for Louise, allowing readers a glimpse of who the woman the Duchess of Portsmouth may have been, weaving a believable and engrossing story from historical fact. One thing I took away from The French Mistress in particular was the sense of deep-seated loneliness Louise felt – in Paris, and even more pronounced in London. And, though Charles Stuart will never rank highly on my list of admirable heroes, in this respect he and Louise were perfectly matched – both lonely souls finding solace and companionship in each other. Without friends such as Nell had, or means of amusing herself as on the stage which Nell did, Louise’s book is more introspective, and against my will I felt for her – such is Ms. Scott’s gift for characterization. The other character I felt deeply for in this novel was “Minette,” Louise’s Madame. The early chapters following Louise’s first months in Paris are among my favorites in the novel, and the budding friendship between these two women is truly touching. The abuse the princess suffers at the hands of her cold husband, Minette’s dreams of returning to England and most of all Louise’s devotion and friendship to Madame are all poignant and well-written.
For the history itself, I confess I am no expert at all when it comes to Restoration era England – but Ms. Scott writes incorporating dates, places, treaties attempted and lost, wars, political climate and carries out a convincing, passionate, and eminently readable story. The landscapes of both France and England are brought to life in this novel, with more detail of the workings of the court than in the preceding book. Though I will say I missed the rowdiness of Covent Garden and the theater, Louise’s more somber world is enlightening in its own manner.
The French Mistress is a different story than Nell’s, more quiet, more lonely, but every bit as engrossing. Ultimately, I highly enjoyed The French Mistress, and certainly recommend it to fans of not only historical fiction, but a well-written and beautifully crafted story.
As Louise de Keroualle bids her family farewell and travels to Paris to become a maid of honor, she never suspects her pivotal role in the courts of kings. Louise’s mission is to secure a husband to bolster her family’s standing and dwindling fortune, but she finds herself and her particular brand of innocent beauty out of fashion in the jaded court of Louis XIV – and unwilling to participate in games and affairs of the nobility, Louise is overlooked. Because of her innocence and fresh-faced honesty, however, Louise quickly becomes Madame’s – Henriette-Anne, Duchess of d’Orleans and sister of King Charles II of England – closest and most trusted maid, friend, and confidante. Madame yearns for her brother and for her homeland, and works tirelessly at bringing France and England together despite the cruelty and disdain of her husband, King Louis’s brother. When Madame finally is granted her dearest wish to visit England with King Louis’s blessing, her first in ten years, the dependable Louise is by her Madame’s side. Almost instantly, King Charles is taken with Louise, as much for her beauty and innocence as for his sister’s high esteem. As for Louise, she had already slowly idealized Charles from her Lady’s stories and letters, and the infatuation quickly progresses to love in Charles’s dashing presence. Though Charles attempts to keep Louise for his own, Madame intervenes and refuses to leave her friend in England, for the good of Louise and for her brother. However, after the sudden death of Madame upon their return to Paris, Louise has a singular opportunity offered to her by King Louis: return to England as Charles’s mistress with the best interests of France in mind, assuming the late Henriette’s role as liaison between the two countries. And Louise, already in love and yearning for a future of her own, accepts and becomes Charles’s French mistress, rising above the cruelty of the English court and becoming one of the most powerful and rich women in the nation.
I have to admit that I started Louise’s story with strong bias – I had fallen in love with the witty Nell Gwyn from The King’s Favorite, Louise’s bitter rival. As such, when I began The French Mistress I found myself criticizing Louise with Nell’s mocking voice in my head. However, once I forced myself to give Louise a fair shot and to relinquish my scorn, I found her story captivating, and her narration (though not nearly so fun and sparkling as Nelly’s) strong in its own right. The French Mistress is Ms. Scott’s gift to the memory of Louise de Keroualle; a chance for the French mistress of the English King to tell her story, against the malicious rumors and prejudice against her and which indeed remain in historical memory. And though Nell will always be my favorite, Louise holds her own.
Louise de Keroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth
The French Mistress paints Louise de Keroualle in a sympathetic light; and her aloofness at court and unpopularity are explained by her natural shyness, her different upbringing as a virgin and innocent out of place with the bawdy humor of the English court, and her background as a devout Catholic in a country loathsome of “popish” tendencies. For all Nell’s wit and charm, Louise is of noble blood and birth, and unlike Nell achieves the rank of Duchess despite her unpopularity and the barbs directed at her from Nell and others (such as Nell’s good friend and major character in the previous book, the Earl of Rochester).
As with her prior book, Ms. Scott excels in creating a distinct voice for Louise, allowing readers a glimpse of who the woman the Duchess of Portsmouth may have been, weaving a believable and engrossing story from historical fact. One thing I took away from The French Mistress in particular was the sense of deep-seated loneliness Louise felt – in Paris, and even more pronounced in London. And, though Charles Stuart will never rank highly on my list of admirable heroes, in this respect he and Louise were perfectly matched – both lonely souls finding solace and companionship in each other. Without friends such as Nell had, or means of amusing herself as on the stage which Nell did, Louise’s book is more introspective, and against my will I felt for her – such is Ms. Scott’s gift for characterization. The other character I felt deeply for in this novel was “Minette,” Louise’s Madame. The early chapters following Louise’s first months in Paris are among my favorites in the novel, and the budding friendship between these two women is truly touching. The abuse the princess suffers at the hands of her cold husband, Minette’s dreams of returning to England and most of all Louise’s devotion and friendship to Madame are all poignant and well-written.
For the history itself, I confess I am no expert at all when it comes to Restoration era England – but Ms. Scott writes incorporating dates, places, treaties attempted and lost, wars, political climate and carries out a convincing, passionate, and eminently readable story. The landscapes of both France and England are brought to life in this novel, with more detail of the workings of the court than in the preceding book. Though I will say I missed the rowdiness of Covent Garden and the theater, Louise’s more somber world is enlightening in its own manner.
The French Mistress is a different story than Nell’s, more quiet, more lonely, but every bit as engrossing. Ultimately, I highly enjoyed The French Mistress, and certainly recommend it to fans of not only historical fiction, but a well-written and beautifully crafted story.
February 22, 2022
I really love all of this author's books on the mistresses of Charles II-she does a great job of bringing Restoration England to life. This story of Louise de Kerouaille was no exception. Definitely recommended reading for anyone with an interest in this time period.
May 23, 2010
Susan Holloway Scott is another author whose works I have become addicted to recently. The period that covers the reign of King Charles II (1630-1685) has only recently become interesting to me. For some reason the Jacobite era - and that of King Charles I have not yet found interest in my reading choices. King Charles II, however, seems like he was a very interesting fellow - albeit a notorious womanizer who kept so many mistresses that I can't imagine how he didn't lose count! The author has written a series of fascinating books that recount the stories of some of Charles' most famous mistresses. This one is a bout Louise de Keroualle, daughter of an impoverished French nobleman, who leaves her family's crumbling chateau to enter the service of Madame D'Orleans (sister of King Charles II) wife to King Louis' sadistic, cruel brother the Duc D'Orleans. Louise learns much of value at the French Court but her fresh, youthful beauty goes largely un-noticed in the lascivious court of King Louis XIV.
Louise remain largely alone until her mistress is allowed to visit her brother, King Charles, in England. The English Court impresses Louise as being very different than the French Court, much more relaxed and less formal. During their stay in England Louise forms an admiration and crush on King Charles. Upon their return to France her mistress dies unexpectedly from what is largely believed to have been a poisoning. Louise is suddenly cut adrift - not knowing where she will next be able to find a position. She cannot go home without having completed her task of securing an auspicious and wealthy marriage. Most of Madame's other maids-of-honor have already returned to their country homes - or have been taken in elsewhere. Louise waits.
Ultimately it Louis that decides to send Louise to the English Court as a spy and it does not take long for her to be noticed by his Majesty, King Charles. The book recounts the story of their love, how Louise rises to become Charles' maîtresse en titre (favorite mistress), how she has a son by Charles - with Charles ultimately ennobling both mother and child. Louise becomes the Duchess of Portsmouth and her son Charles, among other titles, become the Duke of Richmond. The book also chronicles the political tensions of this era. Louise is scorned because she is both French and a Catholic. She considers returning to France but can;t leave "her Charles". Upon Charles death at only 54 and his death left Louise de Keroualle utterly devastated. Ultimately she does return to France and lives out her life for another 50 years after the death of "her Charles". She never marries.
Charles left no legitimate heirs to his throne since his wife, the suffering and very patient Catherine of Braganza, was unable to have children . He did acknowledge a dozen children by his mistresses however. Five by Barbara Villiers (Lady Castlemaine) and his son by Louise deKeroualle (Duchess of Portsmouth). In fact, an interesting tidbit of information is that Princess Diana was descended from one of Charles illegitimate sons and, in the event Price William inherits the British Throne he will be the first monarch to be directly descended from King Charles II
As you may be able to tell. I thoroughly enjoyed this book and am searching out more of Susan Scott Holloway's very entertaining and enlightening book to add to my reading collection !!
Louise remain largely alone until her mistress is allowed to visit her brother, King Charles, in England. The English Court impresses Louise as being very different than the French Court, much more relaxed and less formal. During their stay in England Louise forms an admiration and crush on King Charles. Upon their return to France her mistress dies unexpectedly from what is largely believed to have been a poisoning. Louise is suddenly cut adrift - not knowing where she will next be able to find a position. She cannot go home without having completed her task of securing an auspicious and wealthy marriage. Most of Madame's other maids-of-honor have already returned to their country homes - or have been taken in elsewhere. Louise waits.
Ultimately it Louis that decides to send Louise to the English Court as a spy and it does not take long for her to be noticed by his Majesty, King Charles. The book recounts the story of their love, how Louise rises to become Charles' maîtresse en titre (favorite mistress), how she has a son by Charles - with Charles ultimately ennobling both mother and child. Louise becomes the Duchess of Portsmouth and her son Charles, among other titles, become the Duke of Richmond. The book also chronicles the political tensions of this era. Louise is scorned because she is both French and a Catholic. She considers returning to France but can;t leave "her Charles". Upon Charles death at only 54 and his death left Louise de Keroualle utterly devastated. Ultimately she does return to France and lives out her life for another 50 years after the death of "her Charles". She never marries.
Charles left no legitimate heirs to his throne since his wife, the suffering and very patient Catherine of Braganza, was unable to have children . He did acknowledge a dozen children by his mistresses however. Five by Barbara Villiers (Lady Castlemaine) and his son by Louise deKeroualle (Duchess of Portsmouth). In fact, an interesting tidbit of information is that Princess Diana was descended from one of Charles illegitimate sons and, in the event Price William inherits the British Throne he will be the first monarch to be directly descended from King Charles II
As you may be able to tell. I thoroughly enjoyed this book and am searching out more of Susan Scott Holloway's very entertaining and enlightening book to add to my reading collection !!
January 22, 2010
How could the average rating on this book be 3.43? This is a trashy love story guised to be something greater because it is a historical romance. I put it down after 20 pages. Between the poor writing and constant sexual commentary, I was done. This book is awful.
August 20, 2009
What could be better than reading about the sumptuous life of a favourite love in Charles II’s life? Compound this with an in-depth look at the life of his beloved sister Henriette (whom I simply adore); seen through the eyes of our heroine, Louise de Keroualle, her principle maid-in-waiting- and you have a book that I just devoured.
Although Louise came from an average background, her honourable and loyal family, through merit, was granted the privilege of sending her to the French Court at the service of Madame Henriette. Due to Louise’s genuine kindness and honesty, absolute loyalty, prim demeanor, chaste morals and devoutness to her Catholic faith, this lady-in-waiting raised the bar for herself and soon became Madame’s closest, most trusted and devoted companion.
Poor Henriette (also called Minette), led a tragic life at the hands of her husband, le Duc D’Orleans (her first cousin as well as Louis XIV’s brother). Finding no love in this demeaning relationship, she gave herself completely to the cause of re-kindling ties between France and England through her brother Charles II and her cousin, Louis XIV. This project consumed her completely; bringing her much of the sanity needed to survive (although briefly) through it all.
Henriette dedicated her time in planning her most-awaited reunion with her brother, whom she adored to no end. She would spend endless hours talking to Louise about her brother’s exceptional qualities, along with his charms and loving manners towards the ladies. Henriette thought the world of her brother and this image she portrayed of Charles as being the most perfect, kindest, gentlest and most handsome man ever, helped propel him into the role of hero of Louise’s love fantasies. Young and very impressionable, she became enamoured of King Charles II. Before even meeting him, Charles became Louise’s secret Love of her life.
The reality though, was that Louise’s family wanted her to remain true to her virtues and morals in order to soon marry high, and well. Louise abided by these wishes by keeping herself chaste and pure until she would find a suitable husband…something quite uncommon in Louis XIV’s Royal Court. In fact, most of the ladies surrounding Louise aspired to catching the King’s fancy and becoming his mistress. Let alone that she did not think Louis her type (another rarity), she herself, being dark-haired; completely the opposite of the blonde fair look that was all the rave- Louise was probably not the most sought out gal at court. So, lucky for Louise, Louis did not favour her in that way; The French King would have other plans for this different beauty…
These plans finally unravel when Louis allows Henriette to visit Charles in England. Madame is then reunited with her loving brother where she manages to strengthen the ties between the two countries while convincing Charles to convert to Catholicism- Madame’s most important objective. This is not all that Charles is ventured into. Once he lays eyes on Louise de Keroualle, the King becomes floored by her beauty (English tastes differing from the French…). Louise de Keroualle, a real lady in every sense, captures the heart and soul of this magnificent King.
From then on, Louise’s life would take a sharp turn away from the high aspirations of marrying respectably. Although she would keep a strong hold on her virtues until a solid commitment was reached, inevitably she would forego all to become the King’s favourite. Different from most mistresses of the time, Louise would only know Charles, and be loyal to him for life. Because of her strong devotion to Charles and her selfless dedication to Henriette, Louise comes across as an incredibly warm, loving and caring person; it’s no wonder she was adored and held in the highest esteem by both these royal siblings.
The French Mistress is a definite page turner. The story, written in the first person, gives a brilliant account of the life in the times of both the French and English Courts. The story completely drew me in. I loved reading about the particularities in the lives of two of my very favourite royals. Susan Holloway Scott details the scenes, filling them with emotional dialog and in-depth character perceptions that clearly bring the period to life. I couldn’t help feeling a kinship with Louise and concurring with all her thoughts and emotions- almost like reading the memoirs of a close friend. The book is beautifully written to vividly depict this most grandiose time in all of its spendour, without being devoid of its tragically sad and scheming deceptions.
If like me, you love the extravagance of the French courts of the 17th century; the magnetic and totally charming Charles II spins your fantasies; the superb Louis XIV completely fascinates you; the most graceful and loving Henriette endears you…then, you have got to read about this exquisite French mistress’ take on all of it. I guarantee you’ll love this book.
I defintely want to read more books by Susan Holloway Scott
Although Louise came from an average background, her honourable and loyal family, through merit, was granted the privilege of sending her to the French Court at the service of Madame Henriette. Due to Louise’s genuine kindness and honesty, absolute loyalty, prim demeanor, chaste morals and devoutness to her Catholic faith, this lady-in-waiting raised the bar for herself and soon became Madame’s closest, most trusted and devoted companion.
Poor Henriette (also called Minette), led a tragic life at the hands of her husband, le Duc D’Orleans (her first cousin as well as Louis XIV’s brother). Finding no love in this demeaning relationship, she gave herself completely to the cause of re-kindling ties between France and England through her brother Charles II and her cousin, Louis XIV. This project consumed her completely; bringing her much of the sanity needed to survive (although briefly) through it all.
Henriette dedicated her time in planning her most-awaited reunion with her brother, whom she adored to no end. She would spend endless hours talking to Louise about her brother’s exceptional qualities, along with his charms and loving manners towards the ladies. Henriette thought the world of her brother and this image she portrayed of Charles as being the most perfect, kindest, gentlest and most handsome man ever, helped propel him into the role of hero of Louise’s love fantasies. Young and very impressionable, she became enamoured of King Charles II. Before even meeting him, Charles became Louise’s secret Love of her life.
The reality though, was that Louise’s family wanted her to remain true to her virtues and morals in order to soon marry high, and well. Louise abided by these wishes by keeping herself chaste and pure until she would find a suitable husband…something quite uncommon in Louis XIV’s Royal Court. In fact, most of the ladies surrounding Louise aspired to catching the King’s fancy and becoming his mistress. Let alone that she did not think Louis her type (another rarity), she herself, being dark-haired; completely the opposite of the blonde fair look that was all the rave- Louise was probably not the most sought out gal at court. So, lucky for Louise, Louis did not favour her in that way; The French King would have other plans for this different beauty…
These plans finally unravel when Louis allows Henriette to visit Charles in England. Madame is then reunited with her loving brother where she manages to strengthen the ties between the two countries while convincing Charles to convert to Catholicism- Madame’s most important objective. This is not all that Charles is ventured into. Once he lays eyes on Louise de Keroualle, the King becomes floored by her beauty (English tastes differing from the French…). Louise de Keroualle, a real lady in every sense, captures the heart and soul of this magnificent King.
From then on, Louise’s life would take a sharp turn away from the high aspirations of marrying respectably. Although she would keep a strong hold on her virtues until a solid commitment was reached, inevitably she would forego all to become the King’s favourite. Different from most mistresses of the time, Louise would only know Charles, and be loyal to him for life. Because of her strong devotion to Charles and her selfless dedication to Henriette, Louise comes across as an incredibly warm, loving and caring person; it’s no wonder she was adored and held in the highest esteem by both these royal siblings.
The French Mistress is a definite page turner. The story, written in the first person, gives a brilliant account of the life in the times of both the French and English Courts. The story completely drew me in. I loved reading about the particularities in the lives of two of my very favourite royals. Susan Holloway Scott details the scenes, filling them with emotional dialog and in-depth character perceptions that clearly bring the period to life. I couldn’t help feeling a kinship with Louise and concurring with all her thoughts and emotions- almost like reading the memoirs of a close friend. The book is beautifully written to vividly depict this most grandiose time in all of its spendour, without being devoid of its tragically sad and scheming deceptions.
If like me, you love the extravagance of the French courts of the 17th century; the magnetic and totally charming Charles II spins your fantasies; the superb Louis XIV completely fascinates you; the most graceful and loving Henriette endears you…then, you have got to read about this exquisite French mistress’ take on all of it. I guarantee you’ll love this book.
I defintely want to read more books by Susan Holloway Scott
August 22, 2011
This is the third novel in this series covering King Charles II's mistresses. This one started interesting with Louise going to the French court as a maid of honor to Henriette, Charles II's sister, who was married to The French King's brother. Louise witnessed the horrific things Henriette's husband did to her, but this is where the author started getting a little to repetitious to me. By the time Henriette gets to make the trip to England to see her brother, I was starting to skim a bit. This meeting is of course where Charles II meets Louise. I won't say much in case you are not familiar with this part of history, but this is where the story just never picked up any speed. Maybe it was because I knew the ending, but the author never grabbed my attention. I was hoping for some insight on Louise "was she a spy or not?" The author wrote that she was, but besides some non-informative letters, the author brushed over any real detail and kind of forgot that was her purpose for being there. I highly enjoyed the first one The Royal Harlot, but the following two were just OK. On a positive note, I did like how she portrayed Charles in this one. Since I am not a fan of his and instead of writing about him like he was Mr. Romantic, she showed him for what he was. An egotistical man.
December 13, 2010
I picked up this book to read following the only other Scott book I've ever read, Royal Harlot, and in preparation for the Royal Mistress challenge that I am doing next year (library copy). I greatly enjoyed the first book, finding it well written, paced well, though I couldn't attest to how historically accurate it was, not knowing much about the time period.
This book is written about much the same time as Royal Harlot, being about another of King Charles II's mistresses, Louise de Keroualle. Some historical events actually take place during both books (most significantly the meeting between Charles & his beloved sister, who lived in France), but are told from two very different point of views. The book starts with Louise's life long before she ever meets the King of England; in fact, she doesn't officially become his mistress until page 278. I think for this reason, the book really drags. Louise does seem to really love the King, so she does have that going for her. I couldn't get into Louise's character at all, even at the end of the book I just couldn't like her.
So this is another one of those books that I will only give 4 stars, because though I greatly *liked* the book, I didn't love it.
This book is written about much the same time as Royal Harlot, being about another of King Charles II's mistresses, Louise de Keroualle. Some historical events actually take place during both books (most significantly the meeting between Charles & his beloved sister, who lived in France), but are told from two very different point of views. The book starts with Louise's life long before she ever meets the King of England; in fact, she doesn't officially become his mistress until page 278. I think for this reason, the book really drags. Louise does seem to really love the King, so she does have that going for her. I couldn't get into Louise's character at all, even at the end of the book I just couldn't like her.
So this is another one of those books that I will only give 4 stars, because though I greatly *liked* the book, I didn't love it.
July 18, 2009
I found this book a little disappointing. I thought the scenes involving Louise at the French court were well done, and it was fun to read about Charles II's mistresses from Louise's jealous point of view. I also like the fact that Scott made Louise sympathetic while not attempting to gloss over her faults, especially her love of riches.
Once Louise gave into Charles' advances, though, the book seemed to lag. I found the episode involving the "Popish Plot," which should have been highly dramatic, to be anticlimatic: we hear of Louise being charged with high treason and of other people, such as the royal official Danby, being in danger as well. Then the book suddenly jumps ahead several years, and we never learn the fate of Danby or the resolution of the charges against Louise. It's as if the author simply started to lose interest, or was running up against a maximum word count. I'd been rather enjoying the book up to that point, but I felt frustrated when I closed it.
Once Louise gave into Charles' advances, though, the book seemed to lag. I found the episode involving the "Popish Plot," which should have been highly dramatic, to be anticlimatic: we hear of Louise being charged with high treason and of other people, such as the royal official Danby, being in danger as well. Then the book suddenly jumps ahead several years, and we never learn the fate of Danby or the resolution of the charges against Louise. It's as if the author simply started to lose interest, or was running up against a maximum word count. I'd been rather enjoying the book up to that point, but I felt frustrated when I closed it.
October 10, 2010
This is a story about Louise de Keroualle. She was maid of honor to Henriette-Anne, the duchesse d'Orleans, wed to the brother of King Louis of France. The Duchesse was also brother to King Charles II of England. When The Duchess died Lousie went to England and became the mistress to Charles II. The author did a fine job with the detail of Louise's life. Lousie was one of many mistresses but she was well loved and cared for until the Kings death. She was witty and smart, and had made sure to provide for her own future by asking for favors and titles for herself and her son by the king
October 7, 2018
Loved this book and found a new author that I adore. In fact, ordered most all of her books yesterday! This book tells the story of Louise de Keroualle. Louise started her life as the daughter of a poor nobleman but makes her start by being a lady in waiting to "Madame" who is King Charles II of England's sister and married to King Louis XIV of France's brother. They form a great sisterhood and she gets to accompany Madame to England to visit her brother (with a political agenda as well to accomplish). During that visit she falls for King Charles II who was a known womanizer. Soon after their return to France, Madame dies and Louise is left to fend for herself, but King Louis has a plan to send Louise back to England as a gift to Charles but with plans to have Louise spy on England by having her "get close to the King". So the novel takes us from her beginning to her end. What I liked about this book is that all the other books I have read, Louise comes across as someone not to like. Lady Castlemaine, who is one of Charles's long time mistresses no one can ever like but for obvious reasons but Louise just gets under your skin. In this book, you come to understand her more and she becomes much more likeable. I found it kept my interest through every page and I look forward to reading Ms. Scott's other books.
March 19, 2021
In a time where women were given no choice to their future, a young lady strives to do just that. All Louise wanted was to find a husband who would overlook the fact that she had no dowry and bring honor to her family name. Instead she was sent off to England as a gift to King Charles and ordered by King Louis XIV of France to be his spy.
At first she acts the spy but then begins to fall in love. The connection with Charles is so much more than Louise could ever dream and through her devotion she becomes not only his mistress but his friend, his confidant. Throughout the years she is given many honors and titles, jewels and homes but her one true accomplishment at the end of the day was knowing the man behind the crown and knowing that she was loved.
As a French woman Louise suffered many bias from the English but what they most loathed about her was the fact she was a Catholic. The fight between Catholics and Protestants was very bitter during this time in history and the fact that she never wavered was certainly admirable. Louise knew who she was, what she wanted, and wasn’t afraid to fight for it. The book was well written, and the author did a wonderful job at keeping the story informative as well as entertaining!
At first she acts the spy but then begins to fall in love. The connection with Charles is so much more than Louise could ever dream and through her devotion she becomes not only his mistress but his friend, his confidant. Throughout the years she is given many honors and titles, jewels and homes but her one true accomplishment at the end of the day was knowing the man behind the crown and knowing that she was loved.
As a French woman Louise suffered many bias from the English but what they most loathed about her was the fact she was a Catholic. The fight between Catholics and Protestants was very bitter during this time in history and the fact that she never wavered was certainly admirable. Louise knew who she was, what she wanted, and wasn’t afraid to fight for it. The book was well written, and the author did a wonderful job at keeping the story informative as well as entertaining!
October 11, 2018
Susan Holloway Scott brings us through an interesting historical timeline, French King Louis support for a Catholic England, secret treaty in Dover where Charles promised he would convert, Monmouth Rebellion, & more. Enjoyed it.
May 19, 2018
3,5 Sterne
February 11, 2025
i really enjoyed this until abt the last 70 pages where we speed ran charles dissolving parliament and then dying
March 14, 2014
Louise de Keroualle
…was the French Mistress of Charles II.
(any small resemblance to Robert Downey Jr.
…pure coincidence—no genealogical relationship I know of)
Anyhoo, Louise comes from an impoverished French family. She's sent to the Court of Louis XIV to try to find a rich husband. Specifically she's to be a lady in waiting for Henrietta of England, a/k/a Minette or Madame.
If Minette looks unhappy, she had reason. She was given in marriage to Phillippe of France (a/k/a Monsieur), the younger brother of Louis XIV. Minette was probably in love with Louis. Her husband was famously in love with the Chevalier de Lorriane. And in case you're not up on your French chivalry, a Chevalier in those days would be male.
When Minette died, possibly poisoned by the Chevalier or Monsieur—more likely just driven to a stress-death by their abuse—King Louis decided to play the pimp. Seems during Louise's service to Madame, Charles II took a liking to her. So Louise, now set adrift by her mistress's death, is pretty much ordered by her king to go join Charles II's Merry Harem.
Louise famously held out on Charles for a good while. Being French and Catholic, the contemporary depictions of her weren't flattering; a whore who isn't whoring isn't necessarily given a lot of grace. As for her role as a spy it seems nobody was fooled, Charles least of all. More likely Louise played go-between, serving both Charles and Louis. Given that she came out of the whole arrangement richer than the Duchess of Castlemaine and Nelly Gwynn and with a French duchy as well as an English one, the accounts that described her as grasping might not have been too off-base. But Louise is one of only three (let's just say the pool was much deeper) women Charles, on his deathbed, asked his brother James to look after (the queen being one, and Nelly being the third).
To be honest I don't know enough about Louise to even start to judge whether this book is accurate as to her motives. She was at the least an ambassador of Louis XIV, and at worst an out-and-out spy. That Charles thought of her as he lay dying suggests the relationship between them was something more than user/usee (whichever was which). She retired to France (her English heritance wasn't honored by William of Orange), and she never married after Charles died. That could tell us something, and the author chooses to assume it does. I honestly could see this as a far less romantic and far more commercial relationship, but it could well be my own bias, since Nelly Gwynn is my favorite.
I'll give this one 3.5 stars, just because, to me, Louise's motivations were not as easy to read historically so I think the author takes more license here.
…was the French Mistress of Charles II.
(any small resemblance to Robert Downey Jr.
…pure coincidence—no genealogical relationship I know of)
Anyhoo, Louise comes from an impoverished French family. She's sent to the Court of Louis XIV to try to find a rich husband. Specifically she's to be a lady in waiting for Henrietta of England, a/k/a Minette or Madame.
If Minette looks unhappy, she had reason. She was given in marriage to Phillippe of France (a/k/a Monsieur), the younger brother of Louis XIV. Minette was probably in love with Louis. Her husband was famously in love with the Chevalier de Lorriane. And in case you're not up on your French chivalry, a Chevalier in those days would be male.
When Minette died, possibly poisoned by the Chevalier or Monsieur—more likely just driven to a stress-death by their abuse—King Louis decided to play the pimp. Seems during Louise's service to Madame, Charles II took a liking to her. So Louise, now set adrift by her mistress's death, is pretty much ordered by her king to go join Charles II's Merry Harem.
Louise famously held out on Charles for a good while. Being French and Catholic, the contemporary depictions of her weren't flattering; a whore who isn't whoring isn't necessarily given a lot of grace. As for her role as a spy it seems nobody was fooled, Charles least of all. More likely Louise played go-between, serving both Charles and Louis. Given that she came out of the whole arrangement richer than the Duchess of Castlemaine and Nelly Gwynn and with a French duchy as well as an English one, the accounts that described her as grasping might not have been too off-base. But Louise is one of only three (let's just say the pool was much deeper) women Charles, on his deathbed, asked his brother James to look after (the queen being one, and Nelly being the third).
To be honest I don't know enough about Louise to even start to judge whether this book is accurate as to her motives. She was at the least an ambassador of Louis XIV, and at worst an out-and-out spy. That Charles thought of her as he lay dying suggests the relationship between them was something more than user/usee (whichever was which). She retired to France (her English heritance wasn't honored by William of Orange), and she never married after Charles died. That could tell us something, and the author chooses to assume it does. I honestly could see this as a far less romantic and far more commercial relationship, but it could well be my own bias, since Nelly Gwynn is my favorite.
I'll give this one 3.5 stars, just because, to me, Louise's motivations were not as easy to read historically so I think the author takes more license here.
November 5, 2015
I honestly wish I could give this book 3 1/2 stars because I really like this author's books and loved the "The Countess And The King"; Katharine Sedley was a fascinating woman who genuinely loved James II,Charles the II's younger brother and unsuccessful successor, and,being wealthy had no need of money or titles. Well,Louise De Karoaulle,Mistress to Charles II (Geez,did I spell her last name right?) later Duchess of Portsmouth was no Katherine Sedley. She from a titled but penniless family, conventionally beautiful,sweet,loved them gifts of jewels and titles and other than the fact she was spying for France,a bit dull. She also cried, ALOT(Ok,she was a bit emotional) However,it's to Scott's credit that this book is still rather interesting. I really like how she writes how people actually probably talked back then and Charles the 2nd was a real charming guy.(No, I'm not being sarcastic) Yes,he played around,but they all did.However he wasn't a hypocrite and treated all his mistresses(Hey,that could be the title of an HBO Mini-series)very well and provided for every one of his offspring by them,Louise's included(they had a son together). He even treated his poor barren queen with kindness and didn't divorce her. In short,he was one very likable rogue. Now to the story: HRM meets Lady Louise when she visits England while being a Maid Of Honor to his beloved younger sister,Princess Henriette(called Minette by Charles II who also,humorously enough,called Louise "Fubsy" due to her round baby-face) After Henriette dies at the very young age of 26(many historians believe she was poisoned by her abusive husband; the brother of Louis The XIV) Louise gets an offer to go to England to seduce Charles II who seemed very taken with her and to spy for France as well. Louise,who finds both the offer and Charles equally attractive;heads for England and soon becomes his "favorite" Mistress.The very informative afterward explains why he possibly found her so appealing(beyond her beauty) and kept her long after he had tired of his other mistresses. It also gives you a sad footnote about Louise's life Post-Charles,who returns to her native France,shunned by most everyone(she was reviled in England as well, being both French AND Catholic) living in near isolation until passing away at the advanced age of 85. I'm reading about Barbara Palmer Aka The Countess Of Castlemaine next and since Charles the II,like his French cousin King Louis,loved the ladies,there are quite a few books and I hope to read them all.
August 8, 2011
This is the 3rd Susan Holloway Scott book I've read and I've enjoyed her writing style in all three, as well as her very good attention to historical detail. I really liked Royal Harlot even though Lady Castlemaine was not a very nice person. She didn't have that many redeeming qualities to her beyond her beauty. Then came The King's Favorite about Nell Gwyn, and though I did not really enjoy the way the book was written, I really liked Nell.
And then came The French Mistress.
As usual, Scott's writing style is wonderful. I felt that the historical detail was accurate, the descriptions of the various Courts and locales throughout the book were done well.
I enjoyed the first part of the book, which takes place with Louise as the maid of Charles' sister, Henriette (Madame). After reading Scott's other novels about Restoration England, it was interesting to read about the differences between Charles and Louis.
And then Louise went to England and that's when the book became a huge drag. The only words I can use to describe Louise herself are not very nice. She was self-righteous, smug, full of herself and basically thought she was God's gift to King Charles. She also cried at the drop of a hat which was extremely obnoxious.
Not to mention- SHE WAS A SPY FOR THE FRENCH! NO WONDER NOBODY LIKED HER!!!
I disliked Louise immensely.
I suppose that part of why this book only merited 2 stars. I give it 1 star for the writing (I really like Scott's writing style) and 1 star for the beginning of the book before Louise met Charles because it really just went downhill from there.
My other gripe is that I felt that the book was ended WAY TOO QUICKLY. There is mention of the high treason acts- even Louise herself was convicted of high treason and then all the sudden poof! it just went away. What?
**spoiler alert**
And any chance Louise had of redeeming herself with me personally were gone when she was a total smug bitch at the end when Charles died. History was not kind to Louise, and rightfully so. I think Scott did a good job of making the readers like Charles' first mistress, Lady Castlemaine, and I hoped she might do the same for Louise. However, I'm thinking that just is not possible, Louise just pretty much sucked.
And then came The French Mistress.
As usual, Scott's writing style is wonderful. I felt that the historical detail was accurate, the descriptions of the various Courts and locales throughout the book were done well.
I enjoyed the first part of the book, which takes place with Louise as the maid of Charles' sister, Henriette (Madame). After reading Scott's other novels about Restoration England, it was interesting to read about the differences between Charles and Louis.
And then Louise went to England and that's when the book became a huge drag. The only words I can use to describe Louise herself are not very nice. She was self-righteous, smug, full of herself and basically thought she was God's gift to King Charles. She also cried at the drop of a hat which was extremely obnoxious.
Not to mention- SHE WAS A SPY FOR THE FRENCH! NO WONDER NOBODY LIKED HER!!!
I disliked Louise immensely.
I suppose that part of why this book only merited 2 stars. I give it 1 star for the writing (I really like Scott's writing style) and 1 star for the beginning of the book before Louise met Charles because it really just went downhill from there.
My other gripe is that I felt that the book was ended WAY TOO QUICKLY. There is mention of the high treason acts- even Louise herself was convicted of high treason and then all the sudden poof! it just went away. What?
**spoiler alert**
And any chance Louise had of redeeming herself with me personally were gone when she was a total smug bitch at the end when Charles died. History was not kind to Louise, and rightfully so. I think Scott did a good job of making the readers like Charles' first mistress, Lady Castlemaine, and I hoped she might do the same for Louise. However, I'm thinking that just is not possible, Louise just pretty much sucked.
April 16, 2020
Upon completion of this book, I have now read all of Ms. Scott's historical fiction novels. I had been putting this particular one off for a couple of reasons...One: I knew once I finished this, I'd have to wait impatiently for Ms. Scott to release her future novels like everyone else, and Two: Louise has always been my least favorite mistress of Charles II. I'll admit, I knew almost nothing about her save for what I read in other novels (including Ms. Scott's three previous historical fiction), and almost everything said about her was always negative. I figured I'd give this book a go, but that my opinion of Louise wasn't likely to change.
Well, once again, in her telling of a vilified woman of history, Ms. Scott has managed to paint a very real and human picture of Louise de Keroualle. She did this with Barbara Villiers as well. A woman who was so disliked in her time, and thought of as nothing more than a money-hungry whore...I managed to finish that book thinking much better of Barbara, just as I now do of Louise.
I absolutely recommend this if you're a fan of this time period. I started reading everything I could about the Tudors, but then decided I needed to get out of Henry's court for a while, and into someone else's. That's how I found Susan Holloway Scott. She has opened up a whole new court and King to me, and I'm very grateful. Her ability to tell a fascinating story is remarkable. I truly believe her version of the women she writes about are as close as one can get to knowing them in person. While Nell Gwyn will always be my favorite of the Kings Mistresses, I'm glad I know the story of Louise de Keroualle. She wasn't just some French hussy who was despised by the English...she was a young girl of privilege who came of age in the French court while serving Charles sister, the Duchess of Orleans. She caught the eye of the English King, and after the heartbreaking loss of her Madame, was able to faithfully serve Charles for the remainder of his life. She was a very formal, and tender woman who gave Charles a welcoming respite from the headaches of running a country. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed this book, and can't wait for whatever comes next from Ms. Scott, who is now one of my all-time favorite authors.
Well, once again, in her telling of a vilified woman of history, Ms. Scott has managed to paint a very real and human picture of Louise de Keroualle. She did this with Barbara Villiers as well. A woman who was so disliked in her time, and thought of as nothing more than a money-hungry whore...I managed to finish that book thinking much better of Barbara, just as I now do of Louise.
I absolutely recommend this if you're a fan of this time period. I started reading everything I could about the Tudors, but then decided I needed to get out of Henry's court for a while, and into someone else's. That's how I found Susan Holloway Scott. She has opened up a whole new court and King to me, and I'm very grateful. Her ability to tell a fascinating story is remarkable. I truly believe her version of the women she writes about are as close as one can get to knowing them in person. While Nell Gwyn will always be my favorite of the Kings Mistresses, I'm glad I know the story of Louise de Keroualle. She wasn't just some French hussy who was despised by the English...she was a young girl of privilege who came of age in the French court while serving Charles sister, the Duchess of Orleans. She caught the eye of the English King, and after the heartbreaking loss of her Madame, was able to faithfully serve Charles for the remainder of his life. She was a very formal, and tender woman who gave Charles a welcoming respite from the headaches of running a country. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed this book, and can't wait for whatever comes next from Ms. Scott, who is now one of my all-time favorite authors.
February 3, 2011
The French Mistress was my first experience with the novels of Susan Holloway Scott. Though I haven't read a great deal about Scott online, I happened across a collection of her novels while I was shopping at Half Price Books 20 percent off everything sale back in December. As a fan of historicals, the gorgeous covers immediately caught my attention and, in the spirit of the sale (and my gift card) I grab all of the Scott novels on the shelf, eager to start my journey through history with Scott.
In The French Mistress, Scott explores the fascinating tale of Louise, the Duchess of Portsmouth. Born in France, Louise was sent at a young age to be a maid to Henrietta, Duchess d'Orleans, and sister to the British king, Charles II. Louise quickly befriends Henrietta, but finds that her mistress is stuck in an abusive, loveless marriage. When Henrietta visits her brother Charles in England, he takes a liking to Louise. Once this news reaches King Louis of France, he decides to send Louise to the English court to seduce Charles and gain his support. But Louise finds that she has feelings for Charles, though she is only one is a mass of mistresses in Charles' life.
I was pleasantly surprised by The French Mistress. It started out slow, but quickly grew compelling and through unexpected twists and turns, drew me into Louise's story of intrigue, politics and romance. Scott, while not the best writer in the genre, is a talented one who does a decent job of weaving tales and drawing fascinating characters that are unexpected and a joy to read.
In The French Mistress, Scott explores the fascinating tale of Louise, the Duchess of Portsmouth. Born in France, Louise was sent at a young age to be a maid to Henrietta, Duchess d'Orleans, and sister to the British king, Charles II. Louise quickly befriends Henrietta, but finds that her mistress is stuck in an abusive, loveless marriage. When Henrietta visits her brother Charles in England, he takes a liking to Louise. Once this news reaches King Louis of France, he decides to send Louise to the English court to seduce Charles and gain his support. But Louise finds that she has feelings for Charles, though she is only one is a mass of mistresses in Charles' life.
I was pleasantly surprised by The French Mistress. It started out slow, but quickly grew compelling and through unexpected twists and turns, drew me into Louise's story of intrigue, politics and romance. Scott, while not the best writer in the genre, is a talented one who does a decent job of weaving tales and drawing fascinating characters that are unexpected and a joy to read.
September 17, 2009
I'm not sure if it was Scott's writing or the personality of the main character that made this one such a dissapointment.
Louise de Keroualle was as irritating to me as she must have been to Nell Gwyn and Barbara Villiers.
Her self importance, her greed, her whining and her constant tears made me want to shake her and shout "shut up, you cry baby!"
Yet all this was glossed over by the author as if it shouldn't make the reader dislike the character. At one point King Charles even tells Louise (when she apologizes for crying so often) that he wouldn't have her any other way. Gross.
The authors note at the end was interesting to read.
Scott talks about how through history Louise has been maligned so much that the character flaws attributed to her are now presented as fact by many. She also mentions that Louise was the most hated woman of her time.
Perhaps there was a reason for this?
She was a spy for France! She considered herself far better than the other mistresses the king had. She constantly begged for favors that Charles and England could not afford to give her - and received them anyway.
No wonder she was hated at the time. No wonder she has a bad reputation.
I've enjoyed all of Scotts previous novels FAR more than this one.
Louise de Keroualle was as irritating to me as she must have been to Nell Gwyn and Barbara Villiers.
Her self importance, her greed, her whining and her constant tears made me want to shake her and shout "shut up, you cry baby!"
Yet all this was glossed over by the author as if it shouldn't make the reader dislike the character. At one point King Charles even tells Louise (when she apologizes for crying so often) that he wouldn't have her any other way. Gross.
The authors note at the end was interesting to read.
Scott talks about how through history Louise has been maligned so much that the character flaws attributed to her are now presented as fact by many. She also mentions that Louise was the most hated woman of her time.
Perhaps there was a reason for this?
She was a spy for France! She considered herself far better than the other mistresses the king had. She constantly begged for favors that Charles and England could not afford to give her - and received them anyway.
No wonder she was hated at the time. No wonder she has a bad reputation.
I've enjoyed all of Scotts previous novels FAR more than this one.
July 22, 2011
After Royal Harlot by the same author. This was a snoozer. Unlike the bawdy, entertaining and smart Barbara Villiers, the heroine of this one, a French woman sent by the Sun King to beguile Charles II
was too pallid and likable to be very interesting. Perhaps some may like this book as Louise has a conscience and thinks of herself as basically a good woman. Of course she becomes hated in England for being French and a Roman Catholic.
The after note has her returning to France after Charles died but even there she was not very welcome which made me wonder if she really was as likable as she comes across in the book.
I had a hard time keeping my mind on this and found it thoroughly boring which is not to say the author is not a good writer.
It made me reflect on why it is that novels about unlikable bad heroines sell better than pious heroines. Who liked Scarlett O'Hara in Gone With The Wind? Readers recognize that everyone has flaws and no one is perfect nor can we help being who we are. Thus we find ourselves rooting for flawed heroines while tossing aside novels with too perfect heroines.
was too pallid and likable to be very interesting. Perhaps some may like this book as Louise has a conscience and thinks of herself as basically a good woman. Of course she becomes hated in England for being French and a Roman Catholic.
The after note has her returning to France after Charles died but even there she was not very welcome which made me wonder if she really was as likable as she comes across in the book.
I had a hard time keeping my mind on this and found it thoroughly boring which is not to say the author is not a good writer.
It made me reflect on why it is that novels about unlikable bad heroines sell better than pious heroines. Who liked Scarlett O'Hara in Gone With The Wind? Readers recognize that everyone has flaws and no one is perfect nor can we help being who we are. Thus we find ourselves rooting for flawed heroines while tossing aside novels with too perfect heroines.
September 19, 2010
I find myself justifying the position of Louise de Keroualle as she navigates the duties to family, Mistress, King, Love and Country. She was both infinitely clever and ultimately stupid. She allowed herself to settle for the tenuous position of a mistress and could never claim anything but a passing place in the life of the man she loved and the countries she was dedicated to. She was discounted by many when she was really a kind and devoted woman. She garnered many of the triumphs she sought but to what end. She ended her days alone in solitude lacking true friendship.
Considered a whore by many. Loise was actually a very good woman excepting her role as matresse en titre to the king of england she did much good and little wrong in her life .
So many things would have been different had she bestowed her love on a more worthy person than that of the English king. For though he was a King he was not a good man in my estimation. He was above all unfaithful not only to the many women in his life but to his faith, his people and his word.
Considered a whore by many. Loise was actually a very good woman excepting her role as matresse en titre to the king of england she did much good and little wrong in her life .
So many things would have been different had she bestowed her love on a more worthy person than that of the English king. For though he was a King he was not a good man in my estimation. He was above all unfaithful not only to the many women in his life but to his faith, his people and his word.
August 12, 2010
This one is a delicious romp through Restoration England with a side trip to the court of Louis XIV. For you history fans out there, it might interest you that the heroine of this tale, Louise de Keroualle is the ancestress of the Dukes of Richmond -- a great book to read on that topic is Stella Tillyard's Aristocrats. One thing that I have really enjoyed with this series so far is that the author has managed to keep from judging her characters, and instead accepts them, letting the reader form their own opinion about them. This one is well written and just plain fun to get into.
For a more complete review, please go here:
http://www.epinions.com/review/Book_T...
For a more complete review, please go here:
http://www.epinions.com/review/Book_T...
December 30, 2015
Author of 40 historical novels, Susan H Scott tells the story of the love affair between Louise (The Duchess of Portsmouth) and King Charles II of England. Mistresses of Kings were common in the 1600's and even the Queen had to accept this reality, including the many children of those relationships. The first half of the book takes place in France and the second half in England. If you enjoy historical fiction from this time period, perhaps you'll like this one as much as I did. I really felt sorry for the women and particularly Louise, who had a tough start in life and then a challenging one as a Mistress. Although she acquired a nice fortune, what meaning is that when she has to share the man she loves?
January 15, 2013
An entertaining book that moved quickly. The writing style is easy to read, without being to wordy or over ambitious. I've read other books by the author before, and it is in the same style/vein as those books.
The author balances between the politics and the relationships of the characters, which is what leaves it a little flat. Never does one seem to dominate the story; the author never digs deep into either of this and the story is thus a bit superficial.
The author balances between the politics and the relationships of the characters, which is what leaves it a little flat. Never does one seem to dominate the story; the author never digs deep into either of this and the story is thus a bit superficial.
January 20, 2011
I found this book very interesting. During and after reading this I spent a lot of time on Wikipedia reading about many of the people discussed during this book.
I also enjoyed that the author did a little historical recap at the end, but would have preferred more in depth description of what happened to Louise herself.
I also enjoyed that the author did a little historical recap at the end, but would have preferred more in depth description of what happened to Louise herself.
July 11, 2011
Good grief, Ms Scott: were all of Charles' mistresses the "love of his life"? This is by far the absolute most flattering portrayl of Louise de Keroualle that I have ever seen and I'm not so sure I believe it. Good story line, but just a whole bunch of "Are you kidding me?" Especially if you're read her other books about Nell Gwynn and Barbara Castlemaine.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 48 reviews