Nemesis, the fourth in the Harry Hole series (and finally pronounced correctly [close to “hoo-leh] for the first time in the audiotaped versions of these books I am listening to), has a lot going on. I think too much, really, which is not to say it isn’t created by a talented writer. By the third book, The Redbreast, the best one so far, he began to really prove himself, with rich novelistic themes and multiple threads and real political and historical stakes. And this one has multiple threads, too; it just feels like too many threads. Keep down that thread count, Jo!
But allow me to make my case. This book is about:
*Harry’s continued struggles with alcoholism (though it is not really clear what happens the night his ex, Ann, is killed, after he has seen her for dinner and has spent time at her house. Blackout? He assumes so.
* Harry’s continued struggles with women. Oh, yeah, Anna. At the end of Redbreast Harry is happily with Rakel and her eight-year-old son Oleg. In this one, she is in Russia, so he of course agrees to meet his old girlfriend, Anna, and he has no idea what happened (and we don’t either) that night. Was he unfaithful to Rakel? There’s a new cute colleague (who has a photographic memory), a possible temptation. Every attractive woman he meets is a threat to his equilibrium. At the heart of it is Rakel and whether he can stick it out with her.
*Harry’s continued struggles with violence. One aspect of this is that he makes mistakes that get him beat up in every book. He can be very violent, too.
*Harry’s continued struggles with breaking the law in order to solve crimes, such as hiding the fact that he was (one of the?) last people Anna saw. He makes a deal with an imprisoned criminal, a Romany gypsy, who is in an international crime syndicate.
*Yeah, we’re all over the world, not only in Oslo but Moscow and Brazil; feels a bit like Bond in that way, though more low-life, noir, of course. Bond has flaws but neither Bond nor Fleming admit he has many. Harry is likeable, but is WAY flawed. Likeable, impassioned, talented, but he makes lots of mistakes to be a cop that the brass likes.
*Harry’s continued struggles with being an outsider, one who can'f fit in the police organization very well.
*The central theme is Nemesis, a Greek revenge myth. Who/what is Harry’s nemesis? His colleague Tom Waaler who looks like David Hasselhoff? Alcoholism? Infidelity? Someone who seems to be killing some of the women he falls in love with over these now four books? But a central theme is revenge, for sure.
*There’s a series of bank robberies and murders Harry and the police in general are trying to solve; this is the central crime focus of the book, actually. Could we have just stuck with this? Nope, Nesbo says.
*Harry is busy, in all this; he has to protect Rakel in Moscow from the Bad Guys who theatent o kill her.
*Harry is always trying to figure who killed his first wife, Ellen; this is always on-going in the books as a continuing issue.
*There’s a running psych theme of suicide; people are struggling with it, Harry goes to see a psychologist to get some background on why people do it. Is there such a thing as revenge suicide?
*There’s a “Purple Rain” theme throughout. Nesbo is, besides being a thriller writer, a rock musician. so e music figures in throughout.
*Harry is reading Nesbo’s fave crime writer, Jim Thompson; someone also references Clint Eastwood’s Dirty Harry (they both break rules). These last two issues are not a problem, just threads he weaves in.
This is book 4 of Nesbo for me, and I’d say 3.5 instead of 4 star rating because of its over-ambition, but you have to give him credit for trying to do all this at once, for sure. Not many can do it, of course. And not many should, either, I'd say. I will read more of him, though. I am going to at least read The Leopard and The Snowman, as others think these are his best. Now, for fun, I am going to read Nemesis by Agatha Christie, where I can compare the wits of Harry Hole to Jane Marple. Identical twins?