Alright, ill start with a short summary. The story is about Lina and Mattias. Lina, who was born and raised in Colombia but moved to England when she was 8, decided to come back to Colombia and pay a visit to her childhood best friend/sort of brother, Mattias. Mattias runs a community center that has loads of volunteers, the Anthill. Lina, although forcibly, becomes the new volunteer. The story (mostly) follows Lina rediscovering Colombia.
I was very intrigued by the concept of this book. Orginally my roommate picked up this book for our ‘Colombian month’ in which we consume media/content from a new country in an attempt to discover more about its culture, customs etc. With this in mind, I hoped to get to know more about Colombia’s history but was left with disappointment. Although this could be a wrong assumption on my part, the book didn’t explore as much of Colombian history and the undergoing process after times of conflict as I wouldve liked. On the contrary, it touches upon a lot of different things without going into depth about any of them. We get the storyline of Mattias and Lina, Mattias and the Anthill, the volunteers, the children at the Anthill, Lina’s parents, Mattias’ childhood and troubled (disordered?) personality. This could have been such a powerful book if it just had a little bit more focus. In this instance, its clear that this is a debut novel. And once again, maybe i just went into it with the wrong expectations but the whole Mattias storyline about him being lowkey psychotic did not have to be in the book in order for it to be interesting. Give me more about the the Anthill and what it does for the community. It touched briefly upon the volunteers and the idea of ‘white saviourism’, which is such an intersting topic that could have been explored more!! Or Tomas his backstory and him actually being rich?! Gabriela living on the streets. The idea of children as unreliable narrators, once again, so powerful. Instead we focus on Mattias in a closet. Also Lina’s anxiety is not really elaborated. Of course, not everything has to be explained in a book. However, imo these core ideas were worth diving into more.
The writing style also took some time getting used to. I especially found it annoying that she wrote her thoughts in parentheses.
Regardless, I still think its a book worth reading. Like i said, the concept is very interesting. Its easy to read and you learn a thing or two, but thats about it.
Now om to my favourite part, quotes!!
“What a joy it is to be a volunteer who ‘knows’ how things work, where things are, what things are like. What a pleasure to belong (…).”
“You seem to be the ‘Colombian childhood’ representative, and Colombia itself seems to be an amusing if brief chapter in Emma’s globetrotting life (…).”
“He talks very earnestly and straightforwardely about his childhood in Colombia: he uses terms like ‘trauma’ and ‘PTSD’, and talks about how much safer everything is, now that the war is over. He makes it sound so straightforward, a clear cut story of cause and effect: enemies and victims, with a decisive ending. The country has moved on; the past is a completed chapter, a closed book. (…) [H]e’s gone abroad every summer for the past eight years, running the service trips: Peru, Ecuador, India. And now Colombia. A new addition to the list of acceptably safe countries.”
“You’ll never get the same story twice from anyone here. (…) People will do and say things to get whatever. (…) And especially with you, honey. You need to be careful in this place. It’s a different world. The bluntness of it. -Actually, Lina says, sighing, i grew up here. -Yes, Tomás’s grandmother says. But you’re not from here.”
“It’s funny - you’d think that memory is a safe place, something desirable. That the past is a comforting location you can always return to - childhood as the only homeland, the one true nation we can all migrate to.”