Some interesting comments and details, including how miserable the band felt about using strings and about the whole recording of the album. Also there was a version of Surprise Ice recorded for Quiet but never released. I want to hear it!
But I'm not particularly impressed by the way the book has been written, however. The writer has a habit of leading up to a topic, then has one of the people involved say one or two sentences about it, and then move on to the next bit while I'm left craving for more details. The build-up doesn't always pay off. And then sometimes he stays focused on a minor detail that isn't that interesting at all in the grand scheme of things, like describing a scene from a movie where a song was used, apparently just for the reason that it was a weird scene. Or writing about songs with the word 'rain' in them, because the song 'Failure' has that too...
I was expecting a more analytical / fact-densed work (if that is a word), but the book is more like a personal essay on Quiet Is The New Loud, albeit one that is enhanced by interviews with most parties involved. I had to get used to that, in the beginning it felt like the writer was holding back on talking about the actual album. Right now, I think he just worked with the input he was able to uncover. Additional interviews and analysis would have improved the book immensely. I mean, there's a section on bonus tracks while other tracks from the album aren't even mentioned. And most of those bonus tracks are covers! If you talk about two songs being part of one song, I'd like to ask the band why they cut them up in the first place. Now I've finished it, I'm left feeling it could have been so much more.
Still, there's some really good stuff in there (including an interview with a guy who made a Quiet Is The New Loud EP before the album was released and who absolutely hates the band). That was good stuff!
If this all sounds rather negative, it's not necessarily meant that way, it's just different than I expected. I enjoy reading about one of my favourite albums of all time a lot, although don't go into it expecting it to be the definite book about this release. It paints an incomplete and somewhat flawed picture of QITNL and the band. It's a very personal book as well, clearly, and that is probably for the best since the writer clearly didn't have the means to write a more complete work.
(Please note: I read the English version of this book, and there's a printing mistake on page 95 - where the chapter ends in the middle of a sentence).