This book murdered any interest I once had in this case.
To be concise (unlike the author): the book is boring, rambling, and insists on forcing unnecessary "information dumps" all throughout.
To be more detailed (but still less than the author): I heard about this case after watching a gripping netflix documentary on it. Of course, as a documentary, it couldn't cover all the finer details of such an elaborate case. Therefore, I searched for a book that would. If I were the author of this book, it would be at this point I would write several pages on my own history of watching crime documentaries. Mercifully, I am not that author and will spare you from all that because, of course, you don't care about that unrelated information. If only the author understood this as well.
The book went off to a bad start when the author went on and on about her mother and grandmother in the prologue. I didn't pick up this book to read about the author's family history. Nonetheless, I decided to labour on hoping it was the only time an unrelated information dump would take place. I was wrong. God, was I wrong.
To name a few of the sins of this book:
- Every time a website is mentioned the author would describe how popular the website was, who its users were, how it worked in excruciating detail, and so on. It was like reading a Wikipedia article. As per the author, Facebook is a website that two thirds of Americans use, but she still felt she had to tell us how exactly each aspect (what people post, friending, unfriending, etc) of Facebook worked. Every time a website was mentioned, I was filled with a sense of dread, knowing a 5-10 minute lecture on it was about to come.
- Repetition, Repetition, Repetition. Did I mention Liz wanted an exclusive relationship with Dave? Did I mention Dave didn't want to be in a monogamous relationship? Yes? Well, let me repeat it several times each chapter, just in case you somehow missed it.
- Information dumps on people's backgrounds that go way beyond what is reasonable. A spectacular example of this was when the author was describing Cari's family history from the 1800s! What led to her ridiculously long description of Cari's ancestors was after a long explanation on all the ways Cari was nice. One short anecdote would be sufficient to explain how someone was kind. But no, this author decided to go on for paragraphs, explaining all the ways Cari herself was nice, then mentioning that there was a study which may have proved there was a kindness gene, and then diving into Cari's detailed family history to explain how that may be the case??? Just awful.
I dropped this book after chapter 11. I couldn't take any more information dumps and unnecessary repetition. I figured once I got to the part with the IT expert who had cancer, she would explain in detail what cancer was and his entire employment history to me, instead of summarising it in a paragraph like a normal person. I decided that was a chapter I couldn't deal with.
If you really want to learn more about this case from this book, don't punish yourself and skip through all the information dumps. You will be happier not knowing the inner details of Plenty of Fish.