I've been reading a few Westerns/ historical fiction books set in the late 19th/early 20th century, so I was eager to read this book. I read a lot of history, but don't read a ton of American history/historical fiction in general, so I was doubly excited - especially to read a "clean" romance. I'm not a big fan of romance novels but do enjoy the occasional, well written historical romance.
Unfortunately I was disappointed. The storyline / plot / characters were all well developed, but the research in this book was lacking. The average, casual reader probably wouldn't even have picked up on things, but I did. The first few chapters were fine - or perhaps I didn't notice anything - but once I started picking up on little historical errors, I couldn't stop, and it really took away from the plot to the point where I just didn't really enjoy the book. I also really had a hard time liking any of the characters - none of them seemed very real to me, none of them felt very fleshed out characters.
So let me explain in more detail, some of the historical issues I spotted, and this is by no means a conclusive / exhaustive list:
* multiple instances of grown women being referred to as "girls" - both by other women & men.
*referring to Texas as civilization, and being more civilized than Idaho territory, where Kat was currently living, and referring to Texas as being equally settled as Boston was where Kat received her medical degree
* speaking of which, her father was a poor country farmer, where he would have been paid in chicken, eggs, and other produce IF at all... how did he afford to send her to college back East?
* Everyone seems VERY rich - at least three different people refer to their books, when books were incredibly expensive and relatively rare out west. I can see Kat & her father owning a few medical books but the average person would only own a few books in their entire life, and it would be a big deal to make the time to read - a real treat. Not mentioned casually as this is normal, every day business
* Kat not knowing how to sew or cook. She certainly would have known how to sew and she definitely would have known how to cook. She might not have been skilled at either one, but she certainly would have been capable of doing basic cooking and sewing.
* My biggest issue in the entire book - there's a scene where Kat & her father are doing target practice, shooting at tin cans with a gun that was invented two years prior. OK... sure, they could've owned that gun ... but they were shooting at soup & bean cans. In Idaho territory in 1888. Sure, tin cans were around then & they were easily available & even relatively affordable in the East... but tinned soup wasn't around for another 20 years & tinned food would have been incredible expensive out West, especially when dried beans were so cheap. And again, how would her father have afforded such an expensive food when he would have gotten paid by the barter system? Sure, maybe a patient paid him with a tin can of food... but it wouldn't have been beans.
And then I had other issues with the plot that had nothing to do with historical inaccuracies - such as her father's friend giving her stitches when she was a young girl -- WHAT? Her FATHER is a doctor, yet HE doesn't give her stitches? A simple additional one sentence could explain why this occurred - perhaps he was helping someone hurting worse than Kat? But there's no explanation, just a quick mention of her father's friend giving her stitches as a child. That just doesn't make sense, and there's little details like that that happens repeatedly.
Again, most of my issues with the book most people wouldn't even pick up on. If you read more romance than me, you'd probably really enjoy the story because it is a sweet romance (hence the three stars, which for me means it's a fair-to-good book).