What do you think?
Rate this book


304 pages, Hardcover
First published September 1, 2020
Designing History – The Extraordinary Art & Style of the Obama White House by designer Michael S. Smith (with Margaret Russell) is, as one might expect from the Rizzoli Press, an absolutely lovely book. Designer and author Smith does an expert job reviewing the history of the White House and the many efforts to create a sense of history, a working office and a home for the president’s family. I recently finished Truman so I was particularly intrigued by the further description from a design professional of the WH renovations undertaken by Truman. The book’s beauty truly lay in the detailed discussion of the design process coupled with the many lovely photos and drawings of the finished rooms. The pictures of the finished Treaty Room are STUNNING! Make no mistake this is a beautiful book that will find a home on many a coffee table.
Although I liked this book very much I am kept from awarding it more than four stars as the writing suffered from (in my opinion at least) multiple poor choices in phrasing. I knew I was in trouble as a reader when an early chapter was actually titled “What’s Past is Prologue!” Yikes! That was the most original start Smith and his editors could come up with? In a later chapter we are subjected to the “surreality” of a situation, a “ludicrous synchronicity” of watching himself quoted on television and the “verticality” of White House spaces. In this same section a telephone call from Barbara Walters asking Smith for information is described as “bizarre.” How so? Not bizarre at all really, rather it is a typical feature of Washington life for a journalist to reach out to a potential highly placed insider for a pithy quote in spite of how tenuous the relationship might be. Smith is old enough and experienced enough with high profile clients that he likely knows this so pretending to be shocked seemed staged. Further into the work we are informed that a delayed project was “back-burnered.” “Back-burnered???” Really? I am aware that this is a correct usage of the past tense but this choice, like much of the writing, came across as clumsy and contrived (as well as fawning to the point of distraction whenever discussing the Obamas). Overall it seemed that Smith, perhaps because the Obamas are themselves so eloquent, was trying too hard to impress with his text when his magnificent art spoke for itself.