I received a copy from the publisher via Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
This book is a disappointment. The author, Benkemoun, buys her partner a “new” vintage agenda. What she didn’t expect is to find a list with telephone numbers and names from the French Surrealist scene: Picasso, Braque, Balthus, Giaccometti, Leiris, Ponge, Staël…the list goes on. The agenda belonged to no other than Dora Maar, Picasso’s ex-mistress and muse. Forever remembered as The Weeping Woman, Maar was an artist of her own right and intimately knew the snobs and hip artists of Paris.
By jumping from name to name, Benkemoun recounts the history of the people on that list, as well as their connections to Maar, unravelling the life of a complicated, depressive, bitter, sad and racist woman.
As expected, the author includes the complex inter-personal webs of the people in Maar’s life and circle. What emerges is an unsurprising depiction of people that create – oftentimes – impactful art but people that are also full of themselves. People that conversed and changed art, who usually belonged to leftist circles and fought Nazis, but that were also oftentimes incredibly vain, self-centered and abusive. For anyone who knows Picasso, it comes to no surprise that his behavior towards Maar and other women was asshole-ish at best, abusive at worst. Almost every person in this book seems to enjoy actively hurting others for attention, infamy and pleasure. No doubt that many had positive aspects and could do good – some of Maar’s friends seem to have been good people who care for her and helped her the best they could – but it seems that cruelty was a sport to them. Cruelty and selfishness. If you like to read about the lives of some of the most well-known Surrealist artists and dive into gossip, this is the book for you.
Of course, the focus is on Maar and how she felt about her life. In some part, Benkemoun manages to humanize a person that has lost her own identity in society. Forever The Weeping Woman and Picasso’s former mistress, Maar was first and foremost a person of her own right. An artist that gave up her career as a photographer because Picasso couldn’t have an equal partner. After he broke up with her by making his new twenty-something mistress his official mistress, Maar seems to have fallen into a deep depressive episode.
I can sympathize with a person that has lost so much to an abusive person and has to piece together a new identity after public humiliation and giving up much of herself for a man that never truly respected her.
What I cannot sympathize with is the fact that Maar was a fascist and anti-Semite. Benkemoun does everything in her power to minimize Maar’s political views, attributing her anti-Semitism to: mental illness; her Nazi father (he was a Croatian fascist); artistic provocation; a joke; her fundamentalist Catholicism; her frustration with not becoming a famous artist on her own merits.
Benkemoun thinks that because Maar used to be in leftist anti-fascist circles that she also must have been not-anti-Semite and that is ridiculous. It’s obvious that the author doesn’t know how hatred of minorities works and thinks, like many, that it starts with wanting to eradicate them and not, like it actually does, with “jabs” like: “I don’t want to work with Jews” or “Jews control the world” or “Those fucking homos”, etc. etc. All things Maar has said and thought, as proven by this book. Also, anti-Semitism is also present in leftist circles, albeit less prominent but there is also discrimination amongst those who supposedly fight discrimination. I mean, even withing the LGBQT community there are people that are racist or against trans rights, so maybe she shouldn’t see this as a zero-sum game.
It’s also highly likely that Maar was in those leftist circles because she was with Picasso and not because she actually believed in any of the politics. From all the evidence, it seems that she didn’t give a fuck about the Nazis and them killing Jews, she was only scared that she could be confused as one and be deported. That is all. And that is all in the book, laid out by Benkemoun, who still hesitates calling her anti-Semite until the very last page. And when she finally calls her an anti-Semite, she immediately explains her hatred as frustration. Unfounded frustration but nonetheless a result of “being scorned” by the art world that was ruled by Jewish people. This is conspiracy Nazi level stuff and it remains largely undiscussed.
There is no doubt that Maar suffered greatly because of Picasso but Maar was equally abusive to other people. Yes, I feel for her and understand that her adoration of Picasso – a repulsive person – made her suffer. Picasso messed her up big time. But Maar was also incredibly abusive, despotic, racist, homophobic, manipulative, self-aggrandizing and snobbish like pretty much anyone in her circle. Her mental illness and depression do not excuse her behavior. I can relate, as a depressive person myself and as someone that struggles to find their own career in a competitive field, to Maar’s suffering in regards to her mental health, lost identity and stagnating art but none of this is an excuse for her abhorrent behavior and views and Benkemoun wants to free Maar from her sins by being vague or giving her countless reasons for being an anti-Semite, homophobe, racist or abusive person.
I appreciate the effort of trying to making Maar a person and showing her character, positive attributes and flaws, but Benkemoun trivializes and rationalizes too much of Maar’s views, to the point of white-washing her. Only a person with immense privilege and with no skin in the game can push the negative aspects of Maar aside and say that they love this person because she was brave and strong.
In essence, this book is about privilege – Maar’s, that of her circle, the men, the author, the translator. I found this book to be incredibly frustrating and disappointing because it does something I love – find a riddle and solve it with archival material and digging, digging, digging! – but turns it sour by being superficial and ultimately white-washes a person that held terrible views of marginalized people. The misogyny in this book is called out pretty consistently, but the rest? Racism? Anti-Semitism? Homophobia? Named but ultimately excused with the flimsiest of “arguments”.
If you want some gossip and drama in form of a quick and accessible read, then this is for you.