Yea, though I walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Book 2...
This is not the first 2nd book of a trilogy I've read to suffer from 'dark gloomy valley of emotional despair' syndrome. 1st books are about beginnings, new things and getting to know characters. 3rd books are about resolutions and endings. Middle books are about... slogging through.
Do they have to be? I'm not so sure, but I also don't know if I've read enough to give an accurate judgment. What I *DO* know is I did not enjoy this second book nearly as much as I enjoyed the first.
Positively, I still think the flow of the writing is pleasant, and the pace of world-building enjoyable. Negatively though, I feel like the minor flaws of the first book have grown to cause greater problems in the second. Plot-related challenges to the characters crop up quickly, and just as quickly are put to rest-- for example, the 'problem' of Elspeth not yet having been Chosen and thus her status as Heir in flux was brought up with grave seriousness, and then resolved in the space of ten pages. Moreover, the narrative contradicts itself in her Companion Gwena's status-- one sentence she is stated as Grove-born, and then a few later it is recalled that she was just a shyer member of the Companion herd. (Also? At the end of the book, when the narrative explains extensively to the reader about the two stages of the Truth Spell? All well and good, except this is the SECOND time we the readers see the The Truth Spell in action. After NOT explaining the two stages and just assuming that the reader remembers Book 1's explanation the FIRST time, not only was it confusing to suddenly find the exposition, but it felt demeaning. I am not an absent-minded reader, and I did not forget between that last time Talia used the Truth Spell and this one. Oh, and the book just assumes the reader knows why Kris can't use the second level of the spell but Talia can-- and that's not explained in either Truth Spell Usage plot point. I'm guessing it has to do with the sort of Gift he has, but I COULD HAVE SWORN exposition in the first book placed The Truth Spell as something all Heralds could do to all levels.) The vague and impersonal statement of 'Oh there are Court Intrigues' returns full force, only this time Talia is taken away from those intrigues further as she rides circuit. And then suddenly, for no apparent reason, her shields collapse because of a few poked questions concerning her gift. She was so confidently in control of her gift at the end of Book 1 that the disintegration of her control seemed not only out of character, it did not *logically* make sense. She was amongst THRONGS of people in the capital, and she was exposed to far more than just the Collegium's set of relatively stable minds. Moreover, why had she not discovered or picked up on those rumors while she was in the capital from her Empathy? Moreover moreover, when Talia is taught to shield in Book 1, the event happens within a paragraph and sounds unbelievably easy. Especially because Talia moves through a number of wild emotions throughout the rest of Book 1, and her shields do not waver much. Is it because she is at the Collegium that her shields do not fail before her circuit ride? If so, it would be beneficial to the narrative to say so, because as it is right now the collapse of Talia's mind feels very fabricated.
The circuit-riding itself feels like one long rabbit-trail to the whole of the story so far, especially with how unbalanced it is-- we spend a large part of the narrative sitting with Talia and Kris snowed into their Waystation for chapter upon chapter, and then we watch as they resolve far more interesting village-life events in a handful of pages each. This was the very definition of 'slogging' through long periods of emotionally unpleasant periods for the characters, and I'm sadly surprised to find it after Book 1 felt so warm and radiantly comforting in mood. I understand from an objective point of view that this is the classic 'cocooning' process of character development, the sinking them to depths of hardship before elevating them back up as better people, but after seeing so many narrative choices made in Book 1 in the name of giving the reader a sense of comfort and enjoyment, not to mention many a glossing over of similar emotional growth trends in characters (cf. Talia's growing acceptance of others into her life during her education as a Gray, Elspeth's change from Brat to kind girl) to suddenly decide to write in painful detail this strange emotional shattering feels betrayingly out of step with the previous storytelling. And to hold the reader's head in it for over half the book? We are dancing now with issues of making narrative choices between readerly enjoyment and being 'true to life' in character growth. I would not object so much to the affair, except that so many choices previously have obviously been made in favor of the idealizing the fantasy instead of being 'realistic' (Just take a minute to examine any character presented so far, and it's easy to see the stark strokes they are painted in, either Good or Bad. I would be hard pressed to call any of them 'true-to-life' or 'realistic', but because it's easy to figure out who is good and who is bad, the story is more idyllic) that to send Talia into this dark emotional valley to slowly climb her way out feels completely out of step with everyone else. All the more so because she feels like the only character in the book changing. The narrative has narrowed immensely to focus almost exclusively on Talia and Kris, with a few minor players here and there, and though Kris plays a huge part in it all he merely plays the role of 'rock to cling to' instead of taking on any growth himself. He certainly *helps* Talia in her struggles, but does he struggle himself? His character seems more or less the same at the beginning and at the end, just closer in friendship to Talia. And as for Talia herself, because the emotional spiral felt so fabricated to start with, unfortunately it never felt triumphantly resolved at the end either. The fact that, despite always being under stress and tension because of her shields, she is written with an unwaveringly calm public face I think contributes to this, not to mention the disconcordance with how easily and powerfully she used her Gift in the previous book. Though I can certainly relate/empathize with the feeling of having to 'put on a strong face' in situations when I am in emotional turmoil underneath, I felt like I had lost empathy with the actual *character* of Talia because my willing suspension of disbelief about how her Gift and shields were working had been broken. Oh, and what about Rolan? The first book describes him as an emotional refuge and haven, one that Talia ran to often and took shelter in. Where was he in all this emotional struggle? Did he suddenly lose his ability to provide comfort and love to her? Book 1 establishes Companions as hugely supportive to their Heralds, and I saw very little of that in Book 2, to the point where my believe suspension again was broken.
Also, something must be said concerning the 'floating 3rd person' writing style. I don't recall it ever happening in Book 1, and though it only happened in Book 2 with jumps between Talia and Kris mid-scene (there were in both books POV jumps from scene to scene, but nothing WITHIN the scenes), it happened QUITE A BIT. From some research, it seems the jury is still out on the correctness of writing in this manner, but I contend, at least from what was presented in this book, that it had a narratively weakening effect. I had heard Lackey often used this 'Head-Hopping' writing style, and I've heard Steven King uses it as well, two successful authors, so who's going to argue with that? But I maintain that to switch heads mid-scene means to have to switch bundles of thoughts and emotions, which is flow-distruptive. It bothered me to no end to be jumping back and forth between them mid-scene, often having to backtrack to figure out whose head I was in at the moment to then figure out what THEIR pre-existing knowledge conditions were. And OFTEN, the emotions were just similar enough that the characters muddled together in my head despite trying to keep them separate-- it was hard to separate Talia and Kris after awhile, especially with how long it was just the two of them in that Waystation. On one hand, I can at least say hey, nice piece of symbolic writing... oh, except for the fact that they're not *supposed* to be life-mates, so they shouldn't necessarily be blurring together into one 'general' character. And second, if their characters DID end up just running together, that does not say much for the character defining work put into them.
Generally speaking, I also saw some dismaying signs of what I disliked so much in The Obsidian Trilogy beginning to appear-- a marked tendency to attempt dramatic irony that falls flat, a feeling of fabrication of issues, and a mishandling of climactic moments (Okay, seriously, those two messenger heralds at the end? How much more stilted in terms of forcing the plot can you get? 'You realize you just punished him, Talia.' 'Yes, and I would do it again.' 'Well okay then! Kudos!' Glad you two could suddenly appear for a dialogue line or two in order to vindicate Talia and then JUST VANISH.) I might not be so disappointed with Book 2 if it weren't for how Book 1 really seemed so different from The Obsidian Trilogy stuff, far removed and not making the same mistakes. Also too, a definite feeling of some 'long-term goal', in this case shepherding Elspeth through 'Court Intrigues' (It feels very much like a meaningless buzzword-phrase at this point) to becoming true Heir and eventual ruler, which then disappears into the background for hugely long periods of time while Talia's journey to become properly trained as a Herald in order to do that meanders on for years. I fear for the final book is going wrap up the 'Court Intrigues' Plot A very suddenly and shortly, and only when the nested Plot B of Talia's Herald Training is, further meanderingly, resolved... though I hope I'm wrong.
So, in sum, Book 2 was disappointing. Not necessarily on its own merit, but rather when set next to its predecessor, its flaws become more obvious and sad. Book 1 was SO GOOD at stretching willing suspension of disbelief without breaking it; Book 2 did not manage the same level of finesse. The increasing contradictions in world-building or scene-building logic were frustrating, and further tore at the believability of the narrative. Finally, the long drawn-out unpleasant descent into Talia's emotional psyche felt claustrophobic and suffocating in its 'true-to-life'-ness to an audience who in Book 1 had grown used to the narrative making choices that instead idealized the fantasy. Then, there were so few characters in Book 2, and those that were there presented simply, without real complexity. Finally, Narrative flow was at times difficult to follow due to the head-hopping, and the pace swung between relentless meandering and sudden stutters of 'OHTHERE'SAPROBLEMYAYWEFIXEDIT!'. I do hope the 3rd book redeems the series for me.