FEBRUARY 18
"Why We Do It" by Darrell Schweitzer:
Short (3 pages!) tale about a young man returning to outback with his girlfriend--where things turn out to be quite occult... And pity the girl;-)
This story doesn't quite live up to the excellent goal of the editors, Kevin Ross & Keith Herber (who wrote Ramsey Campbell as editor/author for this book? He's a contributor), but still manages to stay on the right side of clichés, in my opinion.
FEBRUARY 22:
"Salt Air" by Mike Minnis:
A very nice Kingsport story (with a little dash of Arkham). Minnis manages to weave great, brooding atmosphere without stealing from the masters--he has a quite unique writing style, I think, especially in this particular sub-genre. Short sentences. But to the point. And it's working.
A professor with the last name Gammell (rings a bell?) is advised to take a sabbatical and it is decided that Kingsport is the right place for him. The narrator promises to visit him, even if he has weird memories from childhood when his family once visited that dark place. And he keeps his promise... Unfortunately;-)
A story I greatly enjoyed.
"The Disciple" by David Barr Kirtley:
A freshman wants desperately to impress Professor Brose. And the fact that he is so mediocre to barely even be noticed at all doesn't help things for the frustrated freshman narrator.
What could have been a mediocre Mythos tale about a dark cult turns out to have a surprising, well-managed twist. I very much liked this one.
FEBRUARY 25:
"Epiphany: A Flying Tiger's Story" by Stephen Mark Reiney:
Probably my favorite so far in this anthology. Reiney has composed a tale with a different, quite original setting and with wonderful imaginary scenes of cosmicism. The latter in particular is rare nowadays. And while the ending borders on the "haha, it was all only a dream" (which could have turned the story into an all-time bummer) it is cleverly wrapped up so it doesn't end like that, but in a much more satisfying, eerie way.
There were a few times where the "humans are immensely tiny and insignificant" card was overplayed, I think (since it was too early and too little had happened), but besides a nice action-introduction with airplanes fighting the tale also delivers otherwise very credible characterizations of a lone person's mounting (if, probably, justified) paranoia and dread, as the night closes in on him hanging up there in the trees of an unknown jungle with unknown sounds and wildlife... And, even more scary, without sounds, at a certain point...
Hugely recommended. Rainey is always a writer whose stories are worth more than a casual glance.
MARCH 5:
"Bangkok Rules" by Patrick Lestewka:
A story with a high disgust-factor. I liked this story about the narrator (a hitman) who goes to a meeting with his boss--and there things go awfully wrong.
The classic "hardboiled investigator voice" works well enough, but I found the narrator's sudden thoughts of "unspeakable" things, creatures that "have sat by and watched solar systems burnt and faded" (p. 44) and suchlike unbelievable and off-beat, since he didn't strike me as a kind of person who'd contemplate things enough to see things in a more cosmic view. And the actual situation he's in doesn't warrant these kinds of metaphysical thoughts, that's for sure, horrible as it is. And neither is there time to think it through.
MARCH 8:
"Through the Cracks" by Walt Jarvis:
Schizophrenia and other mental disorders are obvious story elements in a horror story. This is one such story. It is one of those with the underlying question: "What if (some) schizophrenia is not a disorder after all, but something dealing with the truth?"
I enjoyed this tale, and think Jarvis manages to tell it in a credible tone of voice as well as having a story that is interesting enough to read to the end. The schizophrenia element is, however, quite over-used in the horror genre; and is in many ways a version of the "(maybe) it was all a dream, after all" plot device. A device I have my problems with; too easy, so to speak.
It also borders on the Lovecraftian/Cthulhu Mythos line of things--and the Invisibles to me seem too interested in human affairs, and with human-like emotions, to be Lovecraftian--but I understand why it's in this collection.
Well told, though, and recommended.
MARCH 10:
"The Thing Beyond the Stars" by Robin Morris:
The spirit of this tale is genuine Lovecraftian, in terms of cosmicism. That alone is worth reading it:-)
Unfortunately, in my opinion, the author tells it in too dry a voice, creating a distance between the dreadful consequences and the unmeasurable scope of the story & its conclusions. It's quite well if you want a straight scientific narrative, but less so if you also want (as I do) a horror tale.
Lovecraft managed the combination of both. Morris doesn't, but I still give huge kudos to the sheer scope of this sci-fi tale spelling out the doom of mankind. Now living on several planets in the universe doesn't help mankind at all--at best it postpones the inevitable.
MARCH 13:
"The Unseen Battle" by Brian Scott Hiebert:
A fairly low-key tale well illustrating horrors of war. We only hear about the war through a person who is diagnosed with shell shock, but enough to get an idea that it's not funny.
The tale was okay, but something about the dialogues didn't really sound true. For instance, when something absolutely unforeseen and dangerous happens in the small society, the protagonist's mother--in haste and bewildered about everything--replies her daughter's question with a sort of well-reasoned (almost logical) sentences, going carefully from A to B to C... It did not ring true; it was "written talk", not real life talk, which it is supposed to imitate. In real life most people would answer much briefer, and mention the immediate danger (in the story's reply this is instead only mentioned in the "conclusion") first, at least.
MARCH 16:
"Final Draft" by David Annandale:
This is the highlight so far for me! And that's an accomplishment.
In this story the narrator is invited to a small, insignificant village where an oddly huge cathedral that no-one have ever really heard of resides. And as he tries to uncover it's history and age things turn more and more strange and eerie--even downright disturbing.
Let me put it this way: The angles are certainly wrong!
Annandale does an amazing job at creating vivid, bizarre scenes where the Lovecraftian core is splendidly combined with a nighmare vision Escher's drawings. And as the story nears its horrible conclusion the loosening of reality as we know it speeds up, so even the odd Escher-like scenes are left behind.
Wow!
MAY 11:
"Fire Breathing" by Mehitobel Wilson:
A story about a radio DJ and the stars and music influencing his own voice system... In a not so nice way;-)
At first I didn't like this story much--but as the threads started to show themselves as we neared the end, and in fact things started to unravel in a dark, inescapable manner I was hooked and ended up thinking this was among the top stories I've read in this collection so far. Kudos to the (several-times award winning) author for that!
And the ending. I shudder! Poor protagonist!
MAY 17:
"The Other Names" by Ramsey Campbell:
I am a great admirer of Campbell, but this tale isn't one of his best.
I like the idea well enough--spooky house, kids and the way they can be rather mean to each other, a boy who is rather enstranged to his parents... And a mysterious book found in said spooky house.
But what ends up as a kind of revenge tale with hints of something larger at play didn't work for me. 2 or 3 stars.
AUGUST 23:
"Bayer's Tale" by Adam Niswander:
Cops are sent out to investigate what turns out to be the grim result of a dark rite. We follow the protagonist as this is uncovered and in the end he faces an unbelievable horror from the ocean.
Something about the opening scene and the rest of the tale's approach to the story didn't match, in my opinion. I also found that too much was given away too early (about halfway in). And the "villain" (the human one, anyway) makes a telephone call I didn't believe in.
The odd thing is that I liked the protagonist well enough and I found the tone of voice credible and suitable realistic in this Mythos & Private Detective Noir set in our time. The plot was also interesting enough. Too bad it crashed with the aforementioned elements, sigh.
3 stars.
AUGUST 25:
"The Call of Cthulhu: The Motion Picture" by Lisa Morton:
On the whole this one was okay and entertaining. I was intrigued by the idea of some cult (it turns out) wanting to make a movie of HPL's "The Call of Cthulhu." The protagonist is a screenwriter who is hired to write the screenplay... And who is visited by HPL talking to him in dreams and helping him write the film adaption...
Unfortunately I am too much of an HPL geek to ignore that the HPL depicted is the boring cliché and not the "real" man. It bugged me, to state it bluntly. In my opinion it would not have detracted from the story to have a more correct HPL appear on the scene--even if it turns out he is no longer human. As it is, it was instead a huge distraction.
The ending turns the story into a kind of In the Mouth of Madness (the film directed by John carpenter), but instead of books it is a film that is the "religion" bringing forth the ancient horrors. In casu Cthulhu Himself.
Neat.
DECEMBER 11, 2011:
"The Aklo" by Loren Macleod:
This one certainly has a Lovecraftian ambition: Archaeology and the theme of "deep time" and ancient, horrible races.
As a whole, though, I wasn't entirely convinced. It's a matter of style preferences, I suspect, but the story's narrative -- everything is supposed to be "from the papers of Nigel Moresby" (p. 19) -- was simply too detached to work for me. This approach is a difficult one, and it can be very succesfull (HPL's stories are clear evidence of that), but it can also destroy a story, in spite of the underlying good idea. Now, I won't say the story is destroyed, it was fascinating and I did want to see how things ended, but it did not grab me on a more emotional level -- something that e.g. HPL himself excelled in doing: Combining the dry language of scientists' journals and said scientists' emotional reaction to the horrors they experience.
A good effort, though.
DECEMBER 18, 2011:
"Under an Invisible Shadow" by David Bain:
Mankind is doomed, and a character (supposedly HPL or someone very much like him?) writes down some notes about it. That's essentially the premis of this story.
I were fairly entertained and can appreciate the idea. The execution could have been better, though. Some of it is because of the too brief scenes presented (although, intellectually I can see the idea with this) and some of it is because of the talk of "The Invisible Lovecraftian Terror" within the narrative.
All in all a good, if a little uneven, collection.
(Received this one Feb. 17, as a gift from a friend in the US.)