The underlying contention of Timothy Brook’s latest work is that China’s conception of itself – the ‘Great State’ of the title – is derived not from the extremely dubious (ridiculous) assertion of 5000 years of Chinese civilisation but instead from the worldview of The Mongols who had conquered China by 1279 and founded the Yuan Dynasty or Da Yuan – the Yuan Great State.
This concept of the Mongols, later inherited by the Han Chinese of the Ming Great State (1368-1644) and then by those other ‘barbarian’ conquerors of China, the Manchus, who founded the Qing Great State (1644-1911), laid the claim that ‘the sovereign of the Great State was endowed with an authority that was potentially universal: those within must submit to his authority, those without must defer to it.’
Timothy Brook argues that this concept matters because it lies at the very foundation of how the people who lived within the Great State saw themselves, so much so that even Chinese pirates – and, therefore, outlaws – would boast to their victims that they were subjects of the Great State.
In furtherance of this contention, Timothy Brook gives us thirteen chapters describing the Great State’s interaction with the rest of the world, each chapter a short historical account from a different and successive time period: stories that range from the Mongols laying siege to the city of Caffa in 1346, to an Englishman’s desire to get justice from a Chinese thief in Bantam in 1604, to the trial of a Chinese collaborator in 1946 in Shanghai after the Second World War.
I will leave it to others to judge how successful Timothy Brook has been in selecting these different accounts to support his contention. All I will say is that, for me at least, I found myself getting wrapped up in these stories – they are that interesting – and often losing sight of the over-arching argument that Timothy Brook is attempting to make. Some chapters, I think, are more successful (and therefore enjoyable) than others. I particularly admired the chapter on the Mongols and the Black Death – in itself worth the price of the book – and the chapter on the French merchant Charles de Constant and his Chinese man-servant Lum Akao who arrived in London in 1793. I can quite believe, though, that other readers will select other chapters as their favourites. Much will depend on which period of Chinese history interests the reader.
The book is extremely accessible and written for everyone, not just the Chinese history specialist. But some prior knowledge of Chinese history would I think prove useful, so that each of these separate stories can be put into its proper historical context.
The book concludes on a rather depressing note: that the People’s Republic of China not only continues to see itself as the victim of colonialism but also – as the latest incarnation of the Great State – itself practices colonialism (Tibet, Inner Mongolian, Xinjiang) and neo-colonialism (Ecuador, Sri Lanka, etc.) through its predatory financial and trade practices around the world, posing, perhaps, the greatest threat to the current world order as enshrined in the articles of the United Nations.
All in all a great book and highly recommended.