In Agatha Christie's short story, "The Double Clue," Poirot investigates the robbery of a collection of medieval jewelry from the safe of a dealer - including a necklace said to have belonged to Catherine de' Medici! Since the theft occurred during a dinner party, the suspects could be any of the guests. But which one? This short story originally appeared in the December 5, 1923, issue of "The Sketch" magazine.
PS. We get to meet Countess Vera Rossakoff once again! One of the author's great minor characters.
Librarian's note: this entry is for the story, "The Double Clue." Collections of short stories by the author can be found elsewhere on Goodreads. Individual entries for all Poirot short stories can be found by searching Goodreads for: "a Hercule Poirot Short Story."
Dame Agatha Mary Clarissa Christie, Lady Mallowan, DBE (née Miller) was an English writer known for her 66 detective novels and 14 short story collections, particularly those revolving around fictional detectives Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple. She also wrote the world's longest-running play, the murder mystery The Mousetrap, which has been performed in the West End of London since 1952. A writer during the "Golden Age of Detective Fiction", Christie has been called the "Queen of Crime". She also wrote six novels under the pseudonym Mary Westmacott. In 1971, she was made a Dame (DBE) by Queen Elizabeth II for her contributions to literature. Guinness World Records lists Christie as the best-selling fiction writer of all time, her novels having sold more than two billion copies.
This best-selling author of all time wrote 66 crime novels and story collections, fourteen plays, and six novels under a pseudonym in romance. Her books sold more than a billion copies in the English language and a billion in translation. According to Index Translationum, people translated her works into 103 languages at least, the most for an individual author. Of the most enduring figures in crime literature, she created Hercule Poirot and Miss Jane Marple. She atuhored The Mousetrap, the longest-running play in the history of modern theater.
Double Clue!? <--That's 2 clues too many, bitches. And everyone's favorite Belgian detective is onto that shit.
Someone from a house party made off with a goodie bag full of jewels stolen from their host. And it's up to Poirot to ferret out which guest has sticky fingers. Countess Vera Rossakoff stars in this one, and I'm pretty sure Poirot's eyes turn into actual hearts and bulge out of his head. It's cute.
If you're looking to kill 20 minutes with a cozy mystery, then this one will fit the bill.
The poorest one from this series, so far. It is too short to contain something valuable, the plot is thin, the clue with the Russian alphabet is quite obsolete. Not to mention the lack of proofs...
PS: I love Agatha and perhaps sometimes I'm too harsh on her, this could be a reason for those poor ratings.
3 Stars. A little simplistic with one pleasant surprise. It relates to my only enjoyable memory of Christie's 1927 novel, 'The Big Four.' We'll get to that. The story was in 'Sketch' in 1923 and 'Hercule Poirot The Complete Short Stories' of 1999. Mr. Marcus Hardman visits Poirot and Hastings about a delicate matter. "But above everything - no publicity!" He collects fine jewellry. Recently, at a small party he hosted, some rubies and emeralds disappeared from his private safe. Like good collectors to this day, he alludes to a possible provenance, an "emerald necklace said to have belonged to Catherine de' Medici." Who was there? Mr. Johnston, the South African millionaire, Lady Runcorn, a society force in various charities, Bernard Parker, a young fellow "not perhaps, quite in the swim, [who has] performed little commissions for me," and Countess Vera Rossakoff from 'The Big Four,' a fascinating member of the old regime in Russia. One of Agatha Christie's great minor characters. My pleasant surprise. The story is an early reference to gay people in main stream literature - not the best, but for a century ago, it could have been much worse. I liked it. Ja2021/Jul2024)
Short and the tv show was definitely better! Jewels have been stolen during a party and Poirot is looking for them. Hastings was really useless in this one...
"Double Clue: A Short Story" by Agatha Christie follows detective Hercule Poirot as he investigates the disappearance of valuable jewels.
The story completes, even before, you want it. Although, one can easily guess the thief, it is Hercule Poirot, who shows us how in his convincing manner.
Overall, a good story. Agatha Christie mystery that is sure a good-read and you get that satisfaction of reading a good mystery.
I’m of the opinion that any story with Countess Vera Rossakoff is a good story. 20 minutes of listening, but it feels satisfying because Poirot has to do some sleuthing. And Hastings doesn’t have time to act stupid, so that’s always a plus.
I love Agatha Christie but I usually do not enjoy her short stories and this one is not an exception. I mean this jewel thief was so careless, makes me think it's almost like a kids game of Clue 🙄 2 stars for the story, 1 star for Charles Armstrong's recital of the book 🙂
Marcus Hardman, an antique collector has a weakness for medieval jewels and showing off his prized collections.
At one of his parties, after showing off as usual, the safe appears not to have been closed correctly. One of four of his guests could have had the opportunity to lift the gems, so he asks Poirot to help him recover his property to save a scandal should this police become involved.
Another early story of Poirot’s cases, with the benefit of Hastings, bright but no halogen bulb. Here he echoes our struggle to see the culprit from among Hardman’s friends. Sometimes I think his confusion leads to our own. If we follow Poirot’s discoveries and actions. What he says and where he goes we’d have a better idea how to interpret the evidence presented.
Here we have two clues for the price of one in and around the safe. The Double Clue seems a little excessive but does it point to misdirection, a Red Herring or simply a careless thief?
Perhaps all three such is the web that Christie weaves.
The story is important also in introducing the character of Only four people had the opportunity to steal Marcus Hardman’s medieval jewels and when Poirot examines the scene of the crime he finds two clues which will lead to the culprit. This story is one of Poirot’s few encounters with Countess Vera Rossakoff, a woman he reciprocated a mutual respect and to be a potential love interest. Similar to an Irene Adler as to Sherlock Holmes.
Christie trivia: What other stories does she appear in?
I wonder that so many of these stories point out the duplicity of the class system in England. Those born to a title are everything and not to be crossed, and the rest of us are disposable and suspects. I do like the use of languages in the solving of this mystery. Good job, Poirot.
................................................................................................ ................................................................................................ The Double Clue - a Hercule Poirot Short Story (Hercule Poirot), by Agatha Christie. ................................................................................................ ................................................................................................
First a Marple in this collection, then a Poirot, and one that I haven't gotten to reading at that! And I'm pretty sure I've only watched the Suchet adaptation of this once, even if subsequent episodes stick Countess Vera Rasakoff in where she never was. I digress. Another short, singular puzzle, and its abruptness is a slight takeaway from it--I like spending time with Poirot and Hastings!--but it's still a fun puzzle with a surprise solution that those with a certain frame of knowledge might be able to figure out (it's a clue that Christie used again in one of her more famous novels, but it's a good one). Worth the read!
My rating: 4.25/5 (rounded down) Would I own/re-read?: Sure! TW: No triggers in the case of this Double Clue, honestly. Does the animal die?: Nor are there any animals harmed! How difficult was the mystery?: As explained above, it's short and the pool is small, so it's not an insurmountable achievement even if guessing, but there is a logical solution.
Veoma kratka prica koja se najvise pamti po tome sto je Poirot, vidno ocaran njome, pustio kradljivicu. Ona se kasnije ponovno pojavljuje u serijalu sto mi itekako ima smisla imajuci u vidu kako je zavrsio ovaj njihov susret. Moram priznati kako mi je ovoga puta knjiga puno bolja od epizode serije. Tamo je Poirotova ocaranost groficom bila mozda previse napadno pokazivana, a ovdje tek na zadnjoj stranici imamo priliku cuti Poirota sto misli o njoj pa je bio bas zgodan epilog cijele price, bas kao i njegov predosjecaj da bi je ponovno mogli vidjeti. Najjaci adut price je definitivno dvostruki trag koji je koncipiran na nacin da je jedan trag bio lazan i sluzio je kako bi nas odvukao na krivu stranu, a drugi je zlocinac nesvjesno isputio. Zanimljivo kako i drugi trag (onaj pravi) optuzuje istu osobu kao i lazni, a sve to zbog ruske abecede. Agatha na samo par stranica kaze vise nego drugi pisci na 100ak!
3.5⭐ I decided to read this short story, because I'm absolutely obsessed with the TV show episode. This is probably the first time in my life that I must admit that the TV show was better. Although, the episode isn't the same like the book, I still enjoyed it more, because there were more characters (for example Miss Lemon wasn't even mentioned in the book), and the overall story was more intrigued. This isn't the authors fault, I love Agatha Christie to my bones. I get that this isn't a book, but just a short story, but I feel like it was a little bit too short. If it was just a few pages longer it would have more space to describe the actual setting or describe the characteristics of the characters. Overall I did like it (ofc I'm biased of Poirot), maybe a few changes could be made, but it was still pretty decent.