What do you think?
Rate this book


1163 pages, Kindle Edition
First published April 28, 2012

Unwanted, Unimaginative and Unfunny Chick Lit in Steampunk Environment.
(Initially wanted to give 4 stars but it's down to 2 star.)
The Emperor’s Edge Collection by Lindsay Buroker may have all the hallmarks of a thrilling steampunk adventure with political intrigue, but it's impossible to ignore the glaring foolishness of its main character, Amaranthe Lokdon. While the trilogy (The Emperor’s Edge, Dark Currents, and Deadly Games) offers an exciting premise of a group of mercenaries facing impossible odds, Amaranthe’s unrelenting idealism and often reckless decisions make for a frustrating journey.

A rollercoaster of action, hindered by a naïve and overly optimistic protagonist.

The first book introduces us to Amaranthe, who, despite being framed for treason, stubbornly clings to the idea that she can still "do good" in a system rife with corruption. This blind optimism leads her to form a team with an infamous assassin, Sicarius, and a band of misfits. While her determination is admirable, it often crosses the line into sheer naiveté. Time and again, Amaranthe throws herself into dangerous situations without a solid plan, relying on her charm and wits to fix things later. It's as if she believes that pure good intentions will magically lead to success—a belief that repeatedly puts her team at risk.

Though the world-building and ensemble cast provide a solid foundation, Amaranthe’s poor decision-making often drags down the narrative. For a former enforcer, she seems oddly oblivious to the ruthlessness of the world she operates in. While other characters—particularly Sicarius—are cautious and pragmatic, Amaranthe's misguided belief that she can talk her way out of anything makes you question how she survived in law enforcement at all.
By Dark Currents, Amaranthe's reckless leadership reaches new heights. Her team faces ever-greater challenges, yet she insists on pursuing the same foolhardy strategies, hoping that persistence and positivity will carry the day. Her refusal to acknowledge the brutal realities of the empire, even as her own life hangs by a thread, becomes increasingly frustrating. How many times can a leader make the same mistakes before learning?
Meanwhile, her idealism often clashes with the cold pragmatism of Sicarius, and while this dynamic adds tension, it also highlights just how absurd her thinking can be. For someone leading a group of criminals and mercenaries, Amaranthe's decisions are often bafflingly out of touch with the danger surrounding them.
In Deadly Games, Amaranthe takes her questionable judgment to gladiatorial arenas, where the stakes couldn’t be higher. Despite all she’s been through, she continues to underestimate her enemies and overestimate her ability to control situations. Her stubborn refusal to recognize the gravity of their circumstances forces her team into perilous situations, with her continual reliance on "hope" instead of solid strategy coming across as irresponsible. Yes, there are moments where her perseverance pays off, but they feel more like strokes of luck than a result of her leadership skills.
Her interactions with Sicarius—whose cold, calculating nature could have served as a much-needed balance to her recklessness—are often frustrating because she refuses to adapt or take his more grounded advice seriously. Amaranthe's insistence on seeing the best in everyone, including dangerous opponents, borders on delusional. By this point in the series, the repeated pattern of her foolish choices becomes grating, and you can't help but feel sorry for the team that keeps getting dragged along into her misadventures.
Verdict
While The Emperor’s Edge trilogy delivers on action, humor, and an interesting ensemble cast, it’s hard to ignore the flaws in its lead character. Amaranthe Lokdon's endless optimism and often foolhardy decisions make her a problematic protagonist. Her leadership is marked by a refusal to face reality, and it’s only through the sheer competence of her team—especially Sicarius—that they survive. In the end, Amaranthe may have heart, but her impractical approach to leading a group of misfit mercenaries leaves much to be desired.
A fun, fast-paced series—if you can overlook the reckless idealism of its lead.
Amaranthe Lokdon, the protagonist of The Emperor’s Edge Trilogy, is presented as a determined, justice-driven character, but her story arc reveals a leader who is dangerously idealistic, impractical, and, frankly, often foolish. Spanning across The Emperor’s Edge, Dark Currents, and Deadly Games, Amaranthe consistently makes poor decisions that jeopardize not only her life but also the lives of her team. Her refusal to adapt to the brutal realities of the corrupt Turgonian Empire is frustrating, and while Lindsay Buroker attempts to frame her as a competent leader, her actions suggest otherwise.
Amaranthe starts off as a former enforcer of the Turgonian Empire, a figure who should understand the lawless, corrupt system she’s up against. After being framed for treason, she forms a group of misfits to fight against the empire’s corruption, yet she remains doggedly optimistic that she can somehow "fix" everything. Her idealism is not only unrealistic but also dangerously naive for someone operating in such a treacherous environment. Despite facing life-threatening situations repeatedly, she clings to the belief that good intentions alone can overcome the most insurmountable odds.
Her story arc is riddled with moments where her blind optimism leads her into reckless situations. She often relies on her charm, wits, or idealism instead of planning and pragmatism, which makes her appear out of her depth in nearly every encounter. Amaranthe fails to learn from her experiences and continues to repeat the same mistakes, which stunts her growth as a character.
Amaranthe’s idealism is her defining trait—and her greatest flaw. Throughout the trilogy, she operates under the delusion that she can change the world through sheer force of will and unwavering optimism. In The Emperor’s Edge, she believes she can recruit an assassin, Sicarius, and an oddball team of mercenaries and lead them successfully despite lacking any real experience in such high-stakes situations. She constantly underestimates the dangers around her and overestimates her ability to talk her way out of trouble, often relying on hope rather than any kind of solid strategy.
Her idealism becomes infuriating when she repeatedly places her team in danger. Instead of adapting to the harsh realities of the empire, she stubbornly sticks to her idealistic vision of doing "good," which, at times, makes her appear delusional. For example, she frequently ignores Sicarius’ sound advice, believing she can achieve victory without the necessary ruthlessness. Time and again, she believes in the "good" in her enemies, often trusting the wrong people, only to be surprised when they betray her.
As a leader, Amaranthe is deeply flawed. Her leadership style is a curious mix of blind optimism and poor decision-making. While she is meant to hold her team of misfits together, her choices frequently put them at risk, and it’s often through sheer luck or the competence of others that they survive. Her repeated failures to listen to more experienced or pragmatic voices—particularly Sicarius—are emblematic of her poor leadership.
In Dark Currents, Amaranthe continues to lead her team into danger with ill-conceived plans. Her refusal to accept the brutal truths of the empire makes her leadership questionable at best, particularly when compared to the more level-headed, strategic approaches of characters like Sicarius. Amaranthe’s decisions feel more like acts of desperation than of careful leadership, and while she has the charisma to rally her team, she lacks the tactical foresight to keep them safe.
One of the most significant criticisms of Amaranthe is that she refuses to learn from her mistakes. As the stakes rise, her idealism doesn’t fade or evolve; it remains constant, even in the face of clear evidence that her methods are not working. In Deadly Games, Amaranthe leads her team into a deadly gladiatorial contest, and her decision-making process continues to be riddled with wishful thinking rather than pragmatism. Her reckless behavior endangers her team time and again, and her inability to evolve into a more grounded leader becomes more glaring as the series progresses.
Amaranthe’s relationship with Sicarius, the cold and calculating assassin, offers a wealth of potential, but it’s another aspect of her character arc that feels underdeveloped and frustrating. Sicarius is pragmatic and ruthlessly efficient, the exact opposite of Amaranthe, and while their dynamic should have led to a deeper exploration of their opposing worldviews, it instead falls flat due to Amaranthe’s insistence on seeing Sicarius through her naive lens.
Rather than learning from Sicarius’ pragmatic approach to survival, Amaranthe continually tries to "redeem" him, convinced that she can unlock some hidden humanity within him. This not only highlights her own lack of self-awareness but also weakens their partnership. Instead of understanding Sicarius for who he is, Amaranthe forces her idealistic views onto him, creating unnecessary tension and diminishing the potential for a more meaningful, balanced relationship.
Amaranthe’s character arc feels more like it’s driven by the demands of the plot than by any meaningful personal growth. Despite being placed in increasingly dangerous situations, she never truly learns from her mistakes. She continues to rely on luck, good intentions, and the strength of her team rather than adapting to the harsh realities of the world she’s navigating.
By the time we reach Deadly Games, Amaranthe has faced numerous life-threatening challenges, yet she still operates with the same blind optimism she had at the beginning of the series. This lack of character development becomes tiresome. Readers expect characters to grow and adapt, especially when faced with such dire circumstances, but Amaranthe remains frustratingly static.
Spoiler-free note: Despite the challenges Amaranthe faces, her story concludes without any significant transformation, leaving readers with a sense of frustration at her lack of growth.
Amaranthe Lokdon’s character is one of the most frustrating aspects of The Emperor’s Edge Trilogy. While the steampunk setting, political intrigue, and supporting cast offer plenty of excitement, Amaranthe’s idealism, poor leadership, and failure to grow as a character weigh the series down. Her unyielding optimism might be seen as charming in small doses, but over the course of three books, it becomes a liability.

The Emperor’s Edge offers readers a fast-paced, action-filled journey, but Amaranthe Lokdon’s reckless decision-making and refusal to adapt make her a difficult protagonist to root for.

Highly recommended for readers who enjoy action and steampunk worlds, but those looking for realistic character growth may find Amaranthe a disappointment.

Final Verdict: While The Emperor’s Edge is recommended for fans of steampunk, action, and strong supporting characters, Amaranthe’s foolishness and idealism can detract from the story’s otherwise engaging elements.