I usually write my reviews in the Notepad app on my phone, but this time I’m writing it in Microsoft Word and then copying over to Goodreads. What a different experience this is! It may lead me to be wordier even than usual, but we’ll see. I’ve been deep in a Curtis Sittenfeld obsession since reading Rodham last summer and reviewing her profile on Goodreads I came across this collection of three short stories (“White Women LOL”, “Creative Differences”, and “Show Don’t Tell”). They were apparently posted online but the first was posted on the website for Oprah’s ‘O’ magazine and I was unable to access it without a subscription. I therefore decided to just purchase the collection.
The book is just 79 pages long (83 with a brief Q&A with the author at the end), so I was able to read it in one day. Let me just summarize my feelings up-front: my general impression is that this collection is not her strongest work but it got better as it went along. Each story was a little bit better than the last, with “Show Don’t Tell” being actually as good and as incisive as anything she’s written. Because of both its brevity and its steadily increasing quality, I ended the book craving more—and that’s what you want from a book, isn’t it?
Let’s take it one at a time, shall we? “White Women LOL” is certainly the weakest of the three. It’s about a woman who becomes the star of a viral video in which she appears to be racist. I say “appears to be”, but in fact her behavior was inspired in large part by an unconscious racism – she was filmed approaching a group of Black partygoers at a function she was attending to ask them to leave, knowing they were not part of the party she was attending partly due to their race. I think every book I’ve read from Sittenfeld has a moment where the main character exhibits a bit of unconscious bias, whether on the basis of race, sex, or gender, and I’ve appreciated how she addresses these moments. She typically acknowledges the character’s blind spot on the topic without a pointed critique or the comfort that, well, their intentions are good. It’s apparent their behavior is bad, but it’s presented more as though for all their good intentions these (white, cisgender, typically heterosexual) characters are prone to prejudice nonetheless. It’s unflinching, I guess is the term I would use to describe it, and candidly, as a white, cisgender, typically heterosexual character myself, as embarrassing as it is to admit I can certainly think of times when I’ve acted on ingrained racial prejudice in ways similar to Jill in this story.
Nevertheless, the way Jill’s behavior is treated in this story feels a little too self-conscious. After the incident has gone viral, she worries to herself whether it is acceptable for her to continue listening to Rihanna or Beyonce. There’s also a moment where she reminisces about marching for justice after a 17-year old Black boy was shot in her town, after which Jill made a donation to the NAACP… or she meant to, at least. She can’t remember if she did. But if she didn’t, it was because it slipped her mind – NOT because she chose not to! Those sorts of jokey references to other times the character failed to be self-critical are a little too loud, in my view, though I do appreciate the overall concept of the story, which seems to be that once forced to focus on it Jill recognizes there is a lot more problematic behavior and beliefs underlying what seemed to her an innocuous moment.
“Creative Differences” centers on a member of a film crew who has flown out to Wichita to film an artist for a “documentary” funded by a toothpaste company. The artist, Melissa, went viral twice for photographs she has taken but when it comes time to do the shoot she backs out because she’s realized that it’s essentially a toothpaste commercial. It’s not the fact that it’s a commercial which bothers her, so much as the bait-and-switch. The character through whose eyes we see Melissa admires her for her confidence in herself, the strength of her convictions. Even as she details her disappointment in him (he is an amateur documentarian himself and, she argues, knows the difference between an advertisement and a documentary), he maintains a sense of awe in her presence. And that’s kind of the whole point of the story. I like it! I was also moved by a moment where Melissa admits that going viral did not feel good. She got no money from it, strangers saw photographs which were intimate to her. While the bigwigs at the toothpaste company insist that Melissa is a fool for turning down the exposure, she asserts that she doesn’t want exposure: she wants to find an audience who appreciates her art.
The last of the three stories, “Show Don’t Tell”, is by far my favorite. I wrote down several quotes. Near the start of the story, the protagonist Ruth is cutting a pineapple and there’s an aside about how this always makes her feel like a “splendid tropical queen with no one to witness [her] splendor.” The overall plot of the story is about Ruth, who is a student in a college writing program, agonizing over whether she will or will not receive a prestigious fellowship. At the same time, she’s in a sort of feud with her neighbor Lorraine whose cigarette smoke filters into Ruth’s apartment. At one point, Lorraine calls Ruth a “fucking bitch” because of her behavior, but then leaves a sunflower and an apology note on her doorstep that evening, which left Ruth feeling “queasy and disappointed” because she’d already crowed to her colleagues about the incident. She later finds out that Lorraine had a daughter who died of anorexia and questions whether the feud is somehow an extension of her grief. Let me just get into some of the things I quoted:
- Ruth believes at least one person who receives the fellowship will likely be female. She states that of the 22 students in the writing program, 7 were “girls or women or whatever we were supposed to call ourselves and one another – I myself was inconsistent on that front.”
- Another student, Bhadveer, argues that no great female writers are attractive. Ruth spends some time trying to name women writers who are attractive (“Virginia Woolf was a babe”), but stops after a while because “providing counterexamples felt distasteful rather than satisfying.”
- At a party, Ruth decides not to drink because of her anxiety over whether she will get the fellowship. When everybody else is drunk and she remains sober, she feels like she has an invisibility cloak on and the knowledge that she would not have a hangover the next morning felt like unexpectedly finding a $20 bill in your pocket.
- Near the end of the story, Ruth reveals that she—SPOILER—did get the prestigious fellowship she was so worried about and now, an indeterminate number of years later, has written 7 novels, all but two of which were bestsellers. Her novels are considered “women’s fiction”. Bhadveer is also a successful author, and though he’s sold fewer books his are prominently reviewed and are nominated for awards. “He’s the kind of writer, I trust, about whom current students in the program have heated opinions; I’m the kind of writer their mothers read while recovering from knee surgery,” Ruth says. She then adds, “To be clear, I’m mocking neither my readers nor myself here – it took a long time, but eventually I stopped seeing women as inherently ridiculous.”
- Finally, at the very end of the story, it returns to the night she got home after the party and found the letter announcing she had been awarded the fellowship in the mail. She yelps in joy and Lorraine emerges from her apartment thinking something is wrong. When Ruth tells her she got the fellowship she wanted, Lorraine says she’s so happy for her and hugs her tightly. This ending is reminiscent of the end of “Bad Latch” from Sittenfeld’s longer short story collection You Think It, I’ll Say It, but it has the added impact of Lorraine’s embrace being, on some level, for her own daughter.
As ever, Sittenfeld’s writing is perceptive, honest, funny, and resonant. While I wasn’t in love with the first two stories the way I was with the third, overall this collection nevertheless captures her style and for me reaffirms why I’m such a fan.