The beginning and ending of life are deeply controversial moral topics with enormous stakes. Most people agree that it is wrong to kill humans--but are fetuses, or people in a deep coma, fully human? Does a person have a moral discretion or "right" to take his or her own life, or to aid another person who does so? And who should bear the cost for those who cannot afford to extend their life, or to pay for ending an unwanted pregnancy? The Morality in Our Age series examines the historical and philosophical background of today's most pressing moral challenges. Here the realities of money, sex, power, and violence meet the ideals of responsibility, integrity, and moral well-being. Though a final "answer" is notoriously elusive in moral discussion, you'll develop a much better insight into the forces and principles at play on today's most serious moral issues, problems, and dilemmas.
[Audio:] Not terrible, a half-way decent entry into the subjects. Problem I have is in the fact that 1) it's a LOT to try to cover and do it justice and 2) the conservative "voices" that David quoted struck me as kind of limited. As a pro-lifer I may be hyper-sensitive to a liberal bias, but I thought that he didn't delve deeply into pro-life arguments. It would have been nice to hear from a James Dobson or John Paul II.
David James explores the moral and philosophical debates on all sides of abortion and euthanasia (including suicide). I can honestly say that it was incredibly balanced - which I respect very much. I walk away from this book with so much food for thought.