What do you think?
Rate this book
Goshta Hatatli Hoti
THIS BOOK HIGHLIGHTS 5 KNOWN FIGURES AND INCLUDES REVIEWS ON 3 TOPICS : 3 PERSONS OF THE 5 MENTIONED ABOVE ARE NOT VERY WELL KNOWN BUT THE QUALITIES THEY POSSESS ARE VERY EXCLUSIVE. THEY CAN BE COMPARED ONLY TO THE MEDICINAL PLANT FOUND IN FORESTS. THESE MEDICINAL PLANTS ARE NEITHER EASILY AVAILABLE NOR MUCH INFORMATION ABOUT THEM IS AT HAND. THEY ARE FOUND MOSTLY BY SHEER COINCIDENCE. BUT THOSE WHO ARE LUCKY ENOUGH TO FIND THEM ARE BLESSED BY THEIR QUALITIES. IN THE SAME WAY KHANDEKAR HAS BEEN INDEBTED BY SUCH CHARACTERS IN HIS REAL LIFE. KHANDEKAR SAYS "INDEED I AM VERY LUCKY TO HAVE THESE PERSONS IN MY LIFE. I AM TEMPTED TO SAY SO.` THE OTHER TWO SKETCHES ARE THAT OF WELL KNOWN CONTEMPORARY LITTERATEUR. THE REVIEWS INCLUDE THAT OF DRAMAS BY KOLHOTKAR, USHA PRABHA (STORIES BY SHRI MANJREKAR) AND MARATHI CHITRAKATHA. THESE ARE DETAILED LITERARY REVIEWS. WE ARE SURE THAT KHANDEKARS FAN CLUB WILL ENTHUSIASTICALLY WELCOME THIS COLLECTION.
- GenresMarathi
Kindle Edition
First published November 1, 2004
22 people are currently reading
305 people want to read
About the author
V.P. Kale
61 books407 followersVasant Purushottam Kale, popularly known as Va Pu, was Marathi writer who wrote short stories, novels, and biographical sketches.He authored more than 60 books. His well-known books include Partner, Vapurza, Hi Waat Ekatichi, and Thikri.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
October 2, 2022
सुमार दर्जाच्या कथा संग्रह.
दिवाळी अंकातल्या ललित लेखन सारखा.
दिवाळी अंकातल्या ललित लेखन सारखा.
September 9, 2022
Excellent, for most part.
Strangely enough, an author renowned and appreciated for his understanding of human nature makes the usual mistake that most males do, due chiefly to a male ego on par with that of a racist that prevents clear thinking.
Racists assume, not only that their - unproven and baseless - assumptions regarding beauty are not only true but therefore held universally; what's worse, they assume a superiority of not just looks but of every other sort, and hold that a proof is provided thereof via physical conquest of others, by chiefly butchering.
This isn't conscious thought, but is of the level that matches early puberty in normal human male. Most adults do know that they do not deteriorate in areas other than physical as age advances, but they fail spectacularly to apply this to gaps of race, gender, or other superficial areas.
And in assuming that young women dress or wish to look good only if males look at them, author makes the same stupid mistake.
Anyone with slightest experience or knowledge knows better. Males rarely know what a woman wears, much less other details. What they also don't know is that women may wish to please a husband, but rarely care about generic male attention, much less relate their dressing to this attention.
As for scientific observation, research shows that most males react to presence of a female exactly in the same way regardless of every other factor but age; that difference of age brings about a reaction only slightly lesser.
Women, however, do notice other women - in detail - and while that provides a negative feedback in the sense that most women do try avoiding criticism from other women, chief motivations for a woman to pay attention to herself and to wish to look well is exactly identical with those of blossoming of a flower. No more, no less.
It might seem poetic when poets compare women to flowers and male attention to that of butterflies and other similar agents flitting amongst flowers for honey and saffron, but it's deep wisdom of a perception not quantifiable.
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................
................................................
September 09, 2022 - September 10, 2022.
................................................
................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
Strangely enough, an author renowned and appreciated for his understanding of human nature makes the usual mistake that most males do, due chiefly to a male ego on par with that of a racist that prevents clear thinking.
Racists assume, not only that their - unproven and baseless - assumptions regarding beauty are not only true but therefore held universally; what's worse, they assume a superiority of not just looks but of every other sort, and hold that a proof is provided thereof via physical conquest of others, by chiefly butchering.
This isn't conscious thought, but is of the level that matches early puberty in normal human male. Most adults do know that they do not deteriorate in areas other than physical as age advances, but they fail spectacularly to apply this to gaps of race, gender, or other superficial areas.
And in assuming that young women dress or wish to look good only if males look at them, author makes the same stupid mistake.
Anyone with slightest experience or knowledge knows better. Males rarely know what a woman wears, much less other details. What they also don't know is that women may wish to please a husband, but rarely care about generic male attention, much less relate their dressing to this attention.
As for scientific observation, research shows that most males react to presence of a female exactly in the same way regardless of every other factor but age; that difference of age brings about a reaction only slightly lesser.
Women, however, do notice other women - in detail - and while that provides a negative feedback in the sense that most women do try avoiding criticism from other women, chief motivations for a woman to pay attention to herself and to wish to look well is exactly identical with those of blossoming of a flower. No more, no less.
It might seem poetic when poets compare women to flowers and male attention to that of butterflies and other similar agents flitting amongst flowers for honey and saffron, but it's deep wisdom of a perception not quantifiable.
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................
................................................
September 09, 2022 - September 10, 2022.
................................................
................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
................................................................................................
November 26, 2017
Considering the standard of other books of Va Pu which I adored this one is nothing, its a so so book.
I was expecting too much from this book, probably after reading G.A. Kulkarni's books I might have felt this one is just okay.
I was expecting too much from this book, probably after reading G.A. Kulkarni's books I might have felt this one is just okay.
Read
September 21, 2017want to read
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews