After reading Miles' Who Cooked the Last Supper? The Women's History of the World a few years ago, I was really excited when I saw she had followed up and wrote something with a modern focus. Ultimately, however, while this book is definitely intriguing, interesting, and (at times) horrifying, there are some major issues and gaps that make several sections of this book at best irresponsibly written and at worst casually racist and ignorant of the intersection between race, class, and gender. And honestly, after spending the last several years reading and writing on colonialism and feminism for my degree, I think if I revisited Who Cooked the Last Supper? I think I'd be likely to find the same problems.
First of all, this can be seen as more of a The Women's History of the (White) Western World, with an occasional anecdote or reference to women in the Global South. Miles does acknowledge in her introduction that this book is primarily focused on the west, because that is the where her area of research is, but given her shortcomings in connecting colonialism and imperialism to feminism when she does have an occasional foray into non-western history, this defense falls short. It might have been better to simply make this book a straight-forward history of women in the west, so she could have perhaps spent a significant more time not ignoring any intersectional analysis of western feminist history.
Very early in the book, Miles plays very fast and loose with comparing American slavery to the circumstances of American women, and claims women should have felt solidarity with the anti-slavery movement because of this--as if there wasn't a large percentage of white American women who either benefited from slavery or were entirely apathetic. When discussing the suffragette movement, she portrays a movement in which race had no part, women were simply banding together in the drive for collective enfranchisement. Yet its clear to anyone who looks at historical accounts of the movement that many white women relegated their black suffragette counterparts to the back of the line in fear. Miles spends a significant amount of time discussing contraception, but not the racist history of eugenics, racism, and xenophobia that are deeply entrenched in this period of history.
I think that Miles desperately wanted to focus on the good women did, but in doing so erased their actions that were setbacks to women of other races and classes. Margaret Thatcher, for example, is only mentioned as a staunch anti-feminist when Miles discusses her rise to power as the UK's first female Prime Minister, not as a woman many modern feminist academics would likely describe as one of the top ten women in power over the course of the last century to set back women's rights.
On the surface, this is a good and intriguing book--but only if I wasn't able or willing to critically think while I was reading it.