I was ecstatic to read about essays, written by Malay academics, poets, essayists and activists, about contemporary issues of the Malays in Singapore as a Malay person myself, or at least someone who should identify as one. However, the various essay centers islam more than it centers Malays. Therefore its cultural plurality (stories, traditions, language, ethics etc) were sadly sidelined. The incredibly reductionistic colonial definition of Malay (as in the CIMO) and Muslim is used interchangeably, almost without question nor hesitation.
Most saddening is the caricature of “secular feminism”, the poor attempt to reinterpret and justify patriarchal injunctions as well as to reconcile the non-overlapping magesteria of science and religion. Strikingly and upsettingly, an author used “female genital cutting” instead of “female genital mutilation”, a phrase many international human-rights bodies use. Furthermore, the false tone of objectivity and refusal to name this act as a gross violation of a women’s, especially of a child, bodily autonomy and rights is deeply troubling.
Not all is gloom, essays like the importance of language, feminism in early Malay literature, the burdens Malay Muslim women face in particular and critical race theory brings up incredibly profound insight to the uniqueness of Malay culture, life and history. Well-written and thoughtful.
Perhaps I am being incredibly harsh. Even though I am disappointed with the overall book, I am still ecstatic about the future of intellectual thinking in the Malay community. This book is just the first step of a long, and hopefully fruitful, journey ahead.