The core subjects are the same as other craft books: storytelling, character, setting, time, point of view, voice and language. For each core subject, he provides evaluations with different contexts, for example, providing characterization through obsessions, their tendency to talk to themselves, or how they showcase their past (which falls in line with the lessons from Brown’s How We Do It). What sets Olmstead’s craft book apart from the others is how reading-focused it is. He collects 150 literary examples to discuss the writerly techniques being employed and provides a rhetorical analysis for each along with exercises to try.
His insight on time and point of view were particularly interesting. He gives us examples of how to show character by collapsing the past and present by highlighting the consequences of the past in the present. In the passage he chose from Gladys Swan’s Carnival for the Gods, he looks at the ways in which the characters’ past “eases back into the present by recounting the toll the years have taken on her body.” This method of collapsing time, considering what we know of our characters off-page, and providing concrete detail would typically go unrecognized by readers.
Regarding point of view, one technique he illuminated was the ways in which first person point of view can be used to heighten immediacy. Typically, the differences in point of view focus on intimacy, how close we feel to the character/action of the narrative (or, alternatively, our ability to move in and out of a character’s interiority to build/maintain mystery/suspense). Though the door opens much wider when we consider how our chosen point of view can act as a companion piece for tenses: a way to make plot points more/less urgent.
Once again, like other craft books, Olmstead discusses what we do not include. While Brown, Wood, and Zinsser tend to look at more of the effect of omission on character, Olmstead brings this to setting. He gives an example from Russell Banks’ Continental Drift and points out that, “We are told what they see in context of their not seeing it.” This is the first time I’ve seen someone discuss omission as a method for establishing setting. It’s known that the amount of detail you include can slow or speed up your narrative, but to consider the “silence” or “white noise” of our setting and choosing to not include it can also help with the same mystery/suspense that omission can provide with characterization. Sure, he looks at the impacts and applications of verisimilitude, but once again, he does this through a variety of lenses.
This book is incredibly helpful for people who've read less craft books, but for someone who's been reading them for years, it was pretty basic most of the time.