Rating Jim Morrison's poetry presents a challenge for me, and here's why: while some view him as merely intoxicated on stage, rambling without depth, I see a complexity beneath his persona. Yet, I can't shake the feeling that he often tries too hard to be distinctive. Does his fame make his writing seem better than it is, or does he actually deserve the praise? As you can tell, I'm torn.
His passion for art and expression is worth acknowledging. Putting words out into the world that hold deep meaning for you in that moment—that’s something truly beautiful. At the beginning of this book is a self-interview in which he writes,
“…and that’s why poetry appeals to me so much – because it’s so eternal. As long as there are people, they can remember words and combinations of words. Nothing else can survive a holocaust but poetry and songs. No one can remember an entire novel. No one can describe a film, a piece of sculpture, a painting, but so long as there are human beings, songs and poetry can continue. If my poetry aims to achieve anything, it’s to deliver people from the limited ways in which they see and feel.”
There are moments where his words feel profound, vibing with that eternal quality he speaks of, and others where they fall flat, lost in his image. Maybe that’s the point: a mixture of brilliance and incoherence, much like Morrison himself. Regardless of how you feel about his work, it’s undeniable that he left a mark—and isn’t that what all poets hope for?