This serves as a good introduction to the Stoics. Like I said in my review to the Early Greek Philosophy collection, one has to bear in mind that the writings of the earliest Stoics only survive in fragments and/or quotations and summaries by later writers such as Diogenes Laertius and Sextus Empiricus. Only a limited perspective can be had regarding them. But one can at least become acquainted with the main points in rough outline of early Stoics like Zeno, Cleanthes, Chrysippus, etc, through these later quotations and summaries.
I certainly came away with an appreciation for the Stoics. In reading this, Cicero's treatment of the Stoics certainly stood out and it has made me rather eager to read him in more depth. I also was quite taken with the section regarding fate. It is interesting how much Calvin's predestinationism has in common with extreme Stoic fatalism. While Saint Paul may have been influenced by Stoical language in various places in his epistles, as far as Paul's idea of predestination is concerned, it is doubtful he would have aligned himself with Stoical fatalism. The Stoical notion of fate revolves around the Greek term "heimarmene", whereas Paul's notion of predestination was rooted in the Greek term "proorisas" -both being very distinctive Greek terminology with very disparate origins. Calvin was most likely more influenced by his own reading of the Stoics than Paul was by his reading. The similarities between Calvin and the fatalists is rather striking.
Another thing that struck me while reading this is what also struck me in reading Plato. It appears that pedagogy and pederasty were linked in the minds of some early Greek philosophers. In Plato, this linkage is a little more ambiguous, but in early Stoics like Zeno, it is far more explicit. This may have also been a contributing factor for his writings to have been no longer copied by later Christians and others. This aspect of Stoicism was disavowed by Epictetus; and, apparently, Musonius Rufus countered it by celebrating marriage and heterosexual relations.
I went through this collection fairly quickly and it will warrant revisiting again in the future. As it stands now, I would like to read the later Stoics seeing as how they are the only Stoics to have substantial works that have survived. The early Stoics survive mostly in commentaries, summaries, refutations, quotations etc. These are better than nothing, but it is always far better to be able to read a philosopher in the working out of their thoughts in sustained elucidation. This is not possible to any adequate degree when limited to the above context.