This book was highly practical, includes 200 case studies, and has a very important and pertinent point to be made for every pastor and leader of every church of any size or demographic: no matter how long your tenure, you are an interim pastor. As such, you should be planning now for the success of your successor and their succession.
As a practical study into succession methods and results, this book is very helpful. Practical issues of bylaws, contracts, and budgeting were this book's emphasis and strength. In this area, I thought it had much to contribute.
There is a level where this book must not be measured as a theological treatise on the value of one method over the other. The investigation and discussion surrounding the successions within "Christian" churches known for questionable orthodoxy is not to discuss that orthodoxy. It is to glean wisdom from the success and failures of high profile transitions from a variety of theological systems. In fact, one of the points of the book is that your theology won't save you from the fact that at some point your pastor will need to be replaced, nor does your theological system necessarily guarantee the success of that necessary transition. Did I find the fact that Creflo Dollar and Joel Osteen are mentioned in the same sentence with - and without distinction from - Matt Chandler, Craig Groeschel, or others? Yes. But the point of the authors is, without distinction, these pastors will leave their church someday, whether by retirement, eventual death, or hit-by-a-bus catastrophe. Are their churches ready? Is yours?
Where the book was seriously lacking was the standard for measuring the success of pastoral succession. While not specifically defined, I understood it to come down to the continued growth of the church's attendance, giving totals, and the new pastor's popularity. Consideration of biblical standards was alarmingly absent. Case in point was a brief treatment of Revelation 2-3 in order to raise the idea of church's having a life cycle and how that life cycle is influenced by "good" or "bad" pastoral succession (pg. 115). Unfortunately, the clear standard for "success" in Rev. 2-3 deals with the measure of obedience and conformity to the standards of Jesus Christ, not by the increased influence of the Nicolaitans or of "Jezebel" measured through growing attendance and giving. Bringing it into our time period, by the standards of NEXT, the growth, wealth, and continued influence of Joel Osteen after succeeding his father is heralded as being ultimately successful. Compared to scripture's standards of sound doctrine, pure gospel preaching, and fruitful obedience to Christ, Osteen's church is nothing short of devastating to the kingdom of God and the salvation of souls. As his church's influence, membership, and wealth continue to grow, so does the influence of the devil and the membership of hell. This does not preclude gleaning wisdom from the father son transition at Lakewood, but we should certainly not consider it a success for the kingdom of God.
Consequently, this book would have benefited from a consideration of how biblical doctrine can and must influence our methodology and practice of pastoral succession. For example, how can sound doctrinal preaching prepare for, influence, and guide pastoral succession? Are certain methods of succession more or less grounded on solid biblical principals? There was an emphasis on how the behavior of and relationships with outgoing pastors, their spouses, or their family members is closely tied to the success of pastoral succession. Does the pastor retire when he said he would retire? Does the pastor, his wife, speak well of and edify the incoming pastor, or are they divisive in word or practice? These are moral and ethical issues that the bible clearly speaks into, and I thought an exegetical defense, doctrinal development, and moral exhortation would have benefited audience of pastors and boards reading this book.