I had such high hopes for this book. I even recommended it to a friend before reading it (always a mistake).
This book started out with so much promise. Temperament mapping for preferences in worshipping and relating to God is genius, and much needed. As an Industrial and Organizational Psychologist and former pastor, this should’ve been the perfect book for me. It just wasn’t and I’m still left feeling that this type of book needs to exist. While Gary Thomas did a good job introducing the concept, someone with more of a psychological background is needed to take it to the next level.
Thomas begins the book well - unpacking the idea that a healthy relationship with God requires having a daily “quiet time”. He highlights the reality that we all relate to and experience God in different ways, and thus we should be permitted and even encouraged to worship him in various ways (through nature, through study, through song/dance, through beauty, through tradition, etc.). The concept is beautiful and Biblical, as Thomas points out if that God commands parents to raise each child according to his/her bent, then surely God parents in this manner as well.
However, once Thomas actually gets into the 9 temperaments, things fall apart. Most of the time it felt like Thomas had the framework nailed, but then had nothing in terms of supporting content. The stories, examples, and analogies felt like they had been manipulated to fit the framework and not vise versa. Further, whereas Thomas begins the book celebrating diversity, he often fell back into an overly dogmatic approach, and seemingly trying to force all of the 9 types back into the formulaic spiritual “discipline” of a quiet time steeped in Bible reading, praying the Lord’s Prayer, and memorizing scripture. In this way, the book seemed to recommend the robotic form of Christianity that he initially set out to battle against.
Again, I think that the framework that Thomas put forth is helpful and his ideas have led me to ideas of my own that I wouldn’t have been drawn to without this book. So, despite the 2-star rating, “Sacred Pathways” isn’t a total loss. But, I do think that somebody could take this model and extrapolate it out to be something really, really beneficial for the 21st century Church.
2020 Reading Prompt 25/40: "A book that cost you less than $5"