I took notes, as I always do. It didn’t help much. “Ulysses” by James Joyce was difficult to read but it had a character and a storyline that followed a sequence the reader could diagram. “Temple of My Familiar” is simply chaotic. There is no single character you can engage with, no single story you can follow, no time line you can track. Imagine a Scrabble game with a couple of dozen characters. Names and vignettes from their lives are put on about 50-100 pieces of the game. Someone throws the pieces in the air and they fall and scatter. You take the table that the pieces landed on and tip it so they all slide in a line against a wall, and that’s how they line up in the book. It is difficult to make any rhyme or reason to this. All the characters are related directly or indirectly. However, it’s kind of like playing the six degrees of separation. C may be married to L who is F’s sister who is a friend of K who works with J. Though C and J will be tied to other characters, the chain above is the only connection between them, and it is not laid out as above. The ties will be found in several different vignettes; if you don't have notes to refer to, you may never get it. Sometimes the connections between people are important; often they aren’t. Having said all that, a few of the stories and memories provide a historical, mythological evolution of man. There are a couple of loose ties to characters in “The Color Purple” which make it a sequel – sort of.
In “The Color Purple,” Walker makes several assertions, which seem to be blatant and straightforward. However, compared to the wrecking ball approach in “The Temple of My Familiar,” the presentation in “The Color Purple” seems subtle. The points in this work are: Men are bad, the white race is responsible for all the evil in the world, marriage is an evil invented by, who else, white men for the purpose of owning and subjugating women and children, marriage doesn’t work out when sex is part of it because it comes from evil. For some reason, marriage is okay if sex is not a part of it. All of the characters and vignettes are used to prove one or more of these assertions; that is the basic thing holding the book together. The things Walker highlights are things that happen in the world every day, but it is improper to base the proof of her assertions solely on the distillation of life found in the stories being presented. Walker only writes stories that prove her point, while in real life, this whole tag-the-blame-on-a-gender-and-a-race quickly falls apart.
In order to load the book with historical “proofs” of her assertions, Walker has created a character, Lizzie, who can remember hundreds of former lives she has been reincarnated into from the beginning of the human race. For example; Lizzie was a pigmy in Africa so close to the emergence of human beings that her people still considered the apes their aunts and uncles and visited and interacted with them regularly.
Walker’s evolution of mankind. In the beginning, women and men lived separately. Their villages were close, so social interaction was possible. Females often had sex with men, pretty much according to the female’s desire to enjoy it. Females had children and raised them. When the male children began to mature, they would be sent to the male village to live their adult lives. Animals could talk to each other and to humans. The animals and men and women all lived in love together. Predators, such as the lion, humanely killed the old, injured, or sick animals and ate them. All the animals that were killed were desirous of being put out of their misery and welcomed the predators with open arms, or hooves as it may be. When not culling the weak from the herd, the lion socialized with the other animals. It was the perfect heaven where the lion and the lamb lay together in unending bliss. Then a white male was born – an albino, I suppose. This was one of Lizzie’s former lives. The white man (Lizzie) felt different and therefore unloved, so he left the tribes of humans and lived alone. In his anger at being alone, he killed lions and upset the whole balance of nature. The lions struck back at everyone. The white race came into being. Then black males wanted to separate the land into small, manageable parcels and own them. This desire for ownership spread until the males eventually wanted to own the females and their children. The males began to pick females and take ownership through marriage. Conclusion: all men want to subjugate and own women. The white race wants to subjugate and own every other race. The white race ruins the balance of nature, destroys the earth (farming, mining, pumping oil, etc), pollutes the air, and has developed a bomb that can destroy everything. Heaven is not something to look forward to; it was already here. The white race destroyed it and is therefore the devil. In order to regain heaven, something has to be done about the white race. I talk of heaven, evil, etc. in a secular sense because Walker does not believe in god. That is just another white race invention to subjugate black men to a white god.
While I totally disagree with Walker on the premise of this book, I found the stories and characters interesting. Though the presentation is one-sided, the problems Walker addresses are real, and I feel empathy for her characters. On the down side, this kind of lop-sided presentation provokes racism (against whites) and misandry (hatred of men). I don’t like that anymore than I like racism against blacks or misogyny.
The quality of character development and general writing is 5-star. I would give the chaos of the book one star, except I suspect it was intentional to keep the focus on Walker’s social agenda. I am rating it low, not because I disagree with Walker on her basic premise, but because a book promoting racism and misandry is divisive and a disservice to social justice. I would give it four stars, but for its divisive purpose, I give it two.