I would like to thank Netgalley and the publisher, Diversion, for offering me an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
True crime novels are both fascinating and haunting. This is the case with Amber Hunt's Accused: The Unsolved Murder of Elizabeth Andes. Andes' case is a cold case, the kind that has been lingering since 1978. Back in 1978, the police were convinced that they knew who the killer was: Elizabeth's boyfriend. He was questioned and eventually when to trial, where he was acquitted. The family would later serve him civilly and, again, he would be found not-guilty. Unfortunately, it would seem that the investigators were so convinced that they had the right man accused, they did not continue to work to find Elizabeth's killer.
Flash forward to Amber Hunt, a journalist that believes in changing the world by giving voices to victims that have been forgotten. Hunt investigates this unsolved case, tracks down witnesses, and brings Elizabeth's story to a popular pod-cast. The goal: perhaps someone will remember something, new evidence will be found, and Elizabeth's murder will finally be solved.
I, personally, do not listen to podcasts so I was unaware of the original podcast series that this book is based upon. Luckily a publisher decided that adapting this story to a book format would be beneficial--and it is. The chapters (representing each podcast that was conducted) delve into Elizabeth's case, asking questions that seem to have been left out of the 1978 investigation. Unfortunately, the more I read about the small-town-investigation the more I felt that Oxford police had really dropped the ball (even for 1978 standards!).
Hunt's goal is not to make the original investigation look amateur--that just happens to be the truth/outcome of some of the findings. Individuals that may have had good information were never interviewed, the police zeroed in on one suspect and never sought another, and evidence (boxes of it, including the murder weapon!) were somehow lost. It is terribly sad... because this case *could* have likely been solved if some more work was done.
The book is well researched (or, should I say, the original podcast was well researched). It is a quick read that is very engaging. I wish it would not have read as closely to a transcript as it does (it is, to be fair, a transcript of a series of podcasts) but at the same time that added to the fact that it was quick and easy to read. There is no "filler" information or clever paragraphs. It delves straight into facts.
Like most cold cases, there are more questions than answers by the time you finish the book. However, I believe that Hunt has shed a great deal of light on the case, and still hope that more information about Elizabeth's murder will be forthcoming.