I have to give CM Harris some credit because Maiden Leap is very different from the books I normally read. It was also not at all what I was expecting. And on that note, let me set your expectations immediately: This is not a romance, at least in the traditional sense. I knew it would be messy--the relationships in this novel, I mean--but I thought the story would go one way and, well, no spoilers. I'll only say it wasn't what I was expecting.
Okay, so I've just explained a bit what Maiden Leap isn't, but what is actually is is the story about the Larson family--both past and present. It's told from 3 perspectives: Kate Larson, the main character, her daughter Samantha, who is a sophomore in high school, and blog posts from Lucy Van Buren, who was Kate's high school girlfriend/first love. It's the story about queer first love (in the 1980s in a small town in Minnesota). There are many what ifs this novel explores. What if Lucy and Kate hadn't been forbidden to date? What if Kate hadn't married the son of a far-right state senator? What if Lucy hadn't left after high school. What if she would have stayed?
This is also a story about conversion therapy, gender identity, queer identity, and gay marriage. Very serious subjects, no doubt, but while CM Harris does a good job of keeping tension, I was never overwhelmed by it. It took me some time to get into the novel, for which I blame the rotating narrative structure, but I was never bored with it. It just took a little more time to read than I'm used to.
I need to make specific mention on a side narrative involving Sam's best friend, Jamie, who identifies as gender queer but is still figuring out their identity. Jamie's inclusion was great and does play an important role in Lucy's story, but there are a lot of uncomfortable and messy things about this representation. Be warned that CM Harris isn't the most graceful with this issue. There's a lot of uncomfortable misgendering of Jamie by characters--even ones who are supportive of them. This is set in the mid 2000s, so that may also have something to do with it. I'm hesitant to attribute this to Harris, but it is there and I want readers who may be triggered to be warned.
I don't want to talk about the ending because I don't want to spoil this for readers, but it was not at all what I was expecting and, though I do feel a little let down by it, it's actually a radical concept that I kind of have to applaud.
Overall, this was interesting. I had never heard of this novel or the author prior to finding this book (because it has "Leap" in the title--ah, Reading Challenges), but I enjoyed the read. It loses some points because of the Jamie stuff and for the ending, but I'm not mad about the time I spent with the novel. 3.5 stars