While I commend the author for reading a lot of other psychology and self help books, his synthesis of that material is weak. He takes three pages to state what could be effectively stated in one or two sentences. I couldn't decide if this was because he was unable to present a clear viewpoint of an idea or if he was padding his writing so he would have enough pages to fulfill his publishing contract. Either way, it wasn't good.
I have actually read a fair amount of the books he references and I do agree that they are worth reading. In fact, you should read those other books instead of this one. I kept reading like a masochist instead of DNF because he was so irritating at times that is became a fun hate read. I googled Hardy and discovered that he is very young, born in 1991. (Or maybe I am old, haha. I'm old enough to be his mother). Maybe I am the wrong audience. If a sixteen year old is reading this book, then they will learn a lot of helpful advice and it would be a worthwhile read. In your fifties, not so much. It was a lot of stating the obvious.
Hardy does something that I hate in a self help book; he acts as if what is applicable to him and his own lifestyle is applicable to everyone. It isn't. All that is needed is a few sentences explaining who his audience is and who this advice would be useful for. If you are neurotypical and middle class or above, then most of this advice would apply to you. He also has very very specific advice that is really his opinion and not based on facts. Stuff like Most movies are useless. Uh, maybe you haven't seen the right movies, haha.
A lot of the research he writes about has a basis in Buddhism. However, Hardy is a Mormon so he downplays this. A lot of his comments were convoluted because he couldn't come out and write that what he is stating is one of Buddha's four noble truths. He does quote several Mormon leaders without mentioning that they are Mormon leaders which I found disingenuous.
I would not say this is a book on personality. It is a book about habits and willpower. His obsession with personality tests I found strange and over the top. Maybe it's really common in his social circle? Or in his religion? I don't know. I do not know of a single person that believes personality tests are legitimate. I thought they were fun little things to do like reading your horoscope? A way to pass time while goofing off on your phone. He brings them up a lot and has a lot of strawman arguments based on this faulty belief that everyone is running around defining themselves through their enneagram or Meyer Briggs label. Ok, I guess some people do. Just like some people are really into astrology and tarot cards. I do not believe it is the vast majority of people and thus worthy of such a detailed rebuttal as he offers in the book.
I struggled with how to rate this. It's one star for the writing style and the author's obtuseness. Five stars for the books he quotes from. FInal verdict 2 1/2 stars.
Lots and lots of highlighted quotes I react to:
Despite wanting to change, people have been led to believe they can't. Right away I am irritated. Led by what? Led by who? Which people? Change how? This is an opinion stated as fact.
The most successful people in the world base their identity and internal narrative on their future, not their past. For example, Elon Musk often speaks of wanting to live out the end of his life on Mars. Human travel to Mars is not a possibility yet. But dying on Mars is the story Musk tells about his future. That is the purpose shaping his identity, actions, and decisions. REALLY? This is the best example of the point you are trying to make? Hardy is quite the fanboy for Musk and it shows in his repeated praise of the selfish billionaire. I think the purpose shaping Musk is his lust for power and control, not a boyhood dream of outer space.
Around age twenty, I decided to leave my hometown and serve a church mission. I was fed up with how my life was going and wanted a fresh start. This two-year experience changed everything for me. I came back a different person with enhanced capabilities and a powerful vision for my future. What an extremely specific example of how to develop as a human, go on a religious mission. In rehab they call this "pulling a geographic". Instead of changing your insides you change your location. Ok sure, this could be a kickstart to internal change, moving. A fresh start. Sometimes people need that nudge.What if you can't change your location? What if you are an elderly relative's primary caregiver and need to stay put? So many what ifs.
Although we think of ourselves as consistent, our behavior and attitudes are often shifting. Do we think that? I don't.
when asked to analyze the difference between their former and current selves, people can easily recognize changes in their personality over the previous ten years. Even still, people consistently expect only minor changes to occur over the next decade. Yes, I read a good book about this called Your Future Self: How to Make Tomorrow Better Today by Hal Hershfield. Go read that instead of this book.
It's harder to imagine the future we want than to remember the past we've lived through. Your future self will be a different person from whom you currently are. It's bad for decision-making to assume your future self will be the same person you are now.
some of my own friends and extended family members are now in terrible situations due to their own poor decisions. Ding ding ding! These are the "many people" Hardy is referring to throughout the book.
Rather than making decisions based on your current identity, you could begin making decisions your future self would love and appreciate. This is good advice. I did this on a small scale the other day. Coming home one night I was tired but I knew I was out of milk for my coffee. I didn't want to swing by the bodega but I knew future me of tomorrow morning would be happy not to have to walk to the store in the rain in the early morning before having coffee. So I made a detour and got the milk that night.
there are four reasons which keep people stuck: 1)They continue to be defined by past traumas that haven't been reframed. 2) They have an identity based on their past, not the future. 3)Their subconscious keeps them consistent with their former emotions. 4)They have an environment supporting their current rather than their future identity Don't really understand number 3 but the rest seems spot on. Reframing negative events is something I find very very helpful. And focusing on your future instead of your past is solid advice.
If your view of your own past hasn't changed much over the years, then you haven't learned from your past experiences and you're not actively learning now. The more mature you become as a person, the more differently you'll view prior experiences.
To say, "That's just the way I am because of my past" is to declare you're emotionally stuck in your past.
When our trauma is unresolved, we stop moving forward in our lives. We become emotionally rigid and shut off, and thus stop learning, evolving, and changing. As such, our past becomes rigid as well, and our memory persists in an unchanging and painful way.
If you're still angry with your parents for your childhood, for example, this speaks more to who you currently are than what actually happened in your childhood. It isn't the contents of your past that need changing, but how you view them today.
Developing a powerful relationship isn't about "finding," but collaboratively creating and becoming new people together, through the relationship. Both parties must adjust and change, becoming a more united whole that transcends the sum of the parts.
Your goals shape your identity. Over time, and through repeated behavior, your identity becomes your personality. Habits and Goals, that's the subject of this book.
Those who become successful constantly expose themselves to new things. They travel, read books, meet new people. They prize education and learning. Knowledge is key to setting goals. You can't pursue something you don't know exists. Exposure is the first source of goals. Whatever you're pursuing right now is based on what you've been exposed to.
As General James Mattis, the twenty-sixth United States secretary of defense, put it, "If you haven't read hundreds of books, you are functionally illiterate and you will be incompetent because your personal experiences aren't broad enough to sustain you." Read everything you can get your hands on. Preach!
Your desires shouldn't be mistaken as the "real" you. They are simply things you've attached meaning to, which you can also detach from or change the meaning of. Just because you want something now doesn't mean you'll want it in five years or even next year.
Having multiple goals is a reflection of fear and a lack of decision-making. You need one major goal. I disagree. You could have a health goal and a career goal and a relationship goal. Why just one?
Look at your life right now. Whatever you see, that's what you're committed to. Whatever you currently weigh, that's the weight you're committed to. However much money you make, that's how much money you're committed to making.Your commitment in life is reflected, 100 percent, by the results you're currently getting. Eh, what if your weight is due to a medicine you are on that you have to take? What if you make that amount of money due to a recession or a lack of jobs in your area or because you have caretaking responsibilities and can't work more hours? It's not so black and white.
Pearson's Law states, "When performance is measured, performance improves. When performance is measured and reported, the rate of improvement accelerates." WHY I LOVE FITBIT, who knew?
By the end of the day, you've made a lot of decisions and are exhausted. As a result, your willpower is all dried up. Low willpower leads to high and unhealthy consumption behaviors-mostly the seeking of quick-release dopamine. Social media, sugar, carbs, and other distractions are common evening activities for many people
Going to bed after ten is unlikely to help you become your future self. This is the author's opinion and what works for him and is not based on any actual fact. Some people are night owls and some people are early birds. It's not one size fits all.
Mark Wahlberg, as an example, goes to bed at seven p.m. so he can wake up at three a.m. to exercise LOL uh, ok. I'll keep that in mind the next time I am starring in an action movie.
When most people think of "trauma," they imagine it only in its extreme manifestations, such as a diagnosed disorder like PTSD. Trauma is not limited to major, easily recognized events, though. Trauma, in a variety of forms, is part of each of our lives. It includes any negative experience or incident I HATE this new definition of the word trauma. No, any negative experience is not trauma. When I am slightly hungry, I am not starving. When there is a chilly breeze and it's 60 degrees, I am not freezing. Words matter. There are many many words and we don't have to decide that trauma - a word that means a very serious experience like rape or torture - can now apply to a bad date or stubbing your toe. This overuse of the word trauma drives me up the wall.
The more psychologically flexible you are, the faster you can let things go. The less psychologically flexible you are, the longer you hold on to even small things.
When a person remains stuck in trauma, they continue experiencing life from their initial reaction to the experience. They don't regulate and reframe how they see and feel about the event.
Trauma, for instance, isn't the event itself but a meaning you take or create from it. Something terrible happened, but what made it traumatic was in your interpretation. The meaning you formed during former "traumas" is now driving your personality, your choices, and your goals. Until you change that meaning.
People often make bad decisions because they act based on their emotions in the moment, rather than on the consequences that will come after.
The facts about your past don't change, but the story you tell yourself about those facts absolutely can and does. And when you revise your own history, you may leave out and ultimately forget certain "facts" that once played a dominant role in your story. Perhaps certain facts weren't actually facts but merely your former perspective.
A fundamental aspect of reframing is shifting what was formerly defined as a negative experience into a positive one. "Positive" and "negative" aren't facts, but meanings..."the gap" occurs when you focus on what's missing. For instance, you might live in a great house. But if you're in the gap, then all you might see is what's wrong with your house. You may have an amazing partner but only see what you believe to be wrong or missing in them. That's the gap. You might have great kids, but only see where they come up short. Compare living in the gap to living in "the gain." Instead of constantly measuring yourself against the ideal, you measure yourself against where you formerly were. It is incredibly powerful to shift what once was a "gap" narrative to a "gain" one. For example, you may harbor negative emotions about something that happened to you in the past. You may view the experience for all that it cost or has done to you. But what would happen if you flipped the script on those experiences? What would happen if you proactively shifted your attention and began looking for the "gains" of such experiences? Shifting from the gap to the gain is how you strategically remember your experiences. It's how you remember your past intentionally, not based on your initial emotional reactions. A terrible experience can be framed as a learning experience.
The past is just raw material to work with. It's entirely malleable and flexible. You get to take the pieces and choose which ones to discard and how you're going to frame them. How you choose to remember your past is what determines your past far more than what actually happened.
Strategic ignorance is about purposefully ignoring or shielding yourself from what you know is a distraction. It's your filter for ensuring that only the right new things reach you.