Bodies in the Tiber is the third book of an ambitious set by Vincent B. Davis, II. Moreover, the three volumes (thus far) of The Sertorius Scrolls are punctuated by two volumes of The Marius Scrolls.
The setting is ancient Rome in the dying days of the Republic, 100 BCE. Gaius Marius has been elected consul for an unprecedented sixth term and asked his protégé, Quintus Sertorius to serve in the Senate. Sertorius, who would later lead a rebellion against Rome (cf., the Sertorian War, 80-72 BCE), is the protagonist and narrator of this volume.
Historical fiction is a remarkable genre, and it gives the author the opportunity to develop literary characters out of figures from “real life.” Davis has obviously done his homework, and his depiction of the rift between Marius and Lucius Appuleius Saturninus offers a marvelous (and scathing) presentation of Roman politics of the time.
The historical liberties are actually “improvements” from the literary perspective. For example, Sertorius is hailed as “the hero of the North” and apparently lost an eye during the military campaigns against the Teutones and Cimbri (which were actually a year apart). Historically, he did suffer such a wound, though not until the Social War (91-88 BCE), yet the chronology by Davis is actually more effective within this fictitious narrative.
The author does a convincing job with the tricky political relationships, notably between Saturninus, Sulla, and Marius (and their factions). He does not fare as well with some of the interpersonal relationships, notably that between Sertorius and his former lover, Arrea. Here, things seem somewhat superficial and might have benefitted from further development.
The action is compelling, and the reader must remember that these were bloody times, as ancient Rome moved inexorably toward civil wars. As the title conveys, bodies would indeed be thrown into the Tiber – or, to translate the idiom, some of the characters would “sleep with the fishes.” The story arc follows the turbulent historical events admirably, and the narrative is well paced.
The text is generally “clean,” although it could have used some editorial services in places. A tale this good should not have typos and other minor errors.
Bottom line: a solid work, worthy of 4.5 stars.