Since reading Nietsche, and have an upcoming book club read on a related topic, I figured I could brush up on Sartre and Existentialism.
Have to say, I enjoy this "Simply XYZ" series so far. Seem to be clear and focused summaries, covering both biographical and contributory content. I think this book focused on just three main themes of Sartre and Existentialism - Responsibility, consciousness, and freedom. So I was a bit disappointed to not get much coverage of the anticipated concepts: Bath Faith, Authenticity and self-deception.
With any dense philosophical topic, it can get a little heady and hard to follow while listening to an audiobook. Unlike reading, where you can slow down to focus on clearly critical terms and passages, an audio book sometimes demands occasional re-winding and re-listening to sections. Sometimes multiple times. And in this case, I think I even just moved on not quite figuring out what was being offered.
One thing that was annoying is the considerable effort covering the criticism of Sartre's concept of Freedom. It was pretty clear to me early on that he is using the term in a narrow, limiting scope compared to a more broad social freedom. Its not a big deal really - while it seems contradictory on the one hand taht we have absolute freedom (of choice), it is constrained by our circumstances. We do not have the freedom to exit or ignore, or step over our situation and circumstances, but rather, given the situation we are in, everyone, their minds/self/consciousness is free to choose to accept it as it is, or to act otherwise - to revolt. To struggle, or choose action. Perhaps, fight, flight, or freeze.
Its nothing more nor less than that. I was troubled how much this droned on over the issue. Sure, its inconvenient that Sartre used a precious world for something so limiting, but the point of critical reading is to understand how the author is using the terms they used, and continue your understanding and critique from there. Don't get hung up on the use of your favorite terms that you disagree with.
I did appreciate the final section - what otherwise might have felt like a bibliography, the suggested reading was a long list of significant works by Sartre and others providing the briefest of summary. This I think helped fill in some of the gaps in his coverage given the limitations for the three focusses of this book.