Every hardened reader is faced with the quandary that reading of one text leads you into reading an associated text. I was with Malcolm and Bean’s ‘The Decline of English Feudalism, 1215-1540’ since last Saturday. A fair enough text it was, showcasing how the 14th century experienced a disastrous beg off in the echelon of the European population. Famines were legion all through the century. An extended period of imperfect diet in all probability increased the vulnerability of the populace to transmittable disease. Unquestionably the elements of the Black Death must have been influenced by the worsening of dietary averages. So catastrophic was the ascend in mortality, that the population of Europe appears to have been halved between 1315 and 1380. Furthermore, this was a calamity which persisted. Evidence suggests that the European economy experienced two full centuries of stagnation and decline. So on and so forth.
At that very jiffy, I was struck by the recollection that for over one and a half months, Peter N Stearns’ kindle version of ‘The Industrial Revolution in World History’ was apologetically parked at an uninhabited curve of my online book collection. And therein began the saga.
We all know who Peter Stearns is. To the casual reader this individual happens to be the author of ‘The Encyclopedia of World History’. To us retards, he happens to be the former Chair of the Department of History at Carnegie Mellon. ‘The Industrial Revolution in World History’ delineates the embodiment of industrialization in terms of technical expertise and economic organization.
What led England to surge ahead of other continental powers in the industrial orb up to the mid-19th century? England in the 18th century was in the most complimentary situation for an industrial revolution, due to a multiplicity of causes: through her overseas trade, plus trade in slaves. She had accumulated cosmic profits which could provide the obligatory capital. In the trade rivalries of European countries, she had emerged as an unparalleled power, acquiring colonies which ensured a habitual furnish of raw materials; after the departure of serfdom. Masses were no longer bound to the land and were free to do to any job they could find. The enclosure movement had begun in the 18th century. Big land-owners wanted combine their large land-holdings. In the self same progression, minor peasants, who had all holdings in land were expelled and an outsized army of landless unemployed people was created.
Thus, there was no shortage labour force to work in the factories; as a result of the revolution of the 17th century, a stable system of government had been established, which was no longer under the domination of the feudal classes. Commercial classes had acquired more political power and there was no danger of government interference; England had plenty of natural resources, such as iron and coal, essential for industries. The sources of iron and coal existed side by side and this saved England from many difficulties that other countries faced; England developed a large shipping industry and had no problem of transportation.
No other country enjoyed all these benefits at this period. Some suffered from a deficiency of capital or natural resources and some from a hostile political arrangement. These factors made England an accepted place for the Industrial Revolution to begin. Almost every other European countries had agrarian economies and lived under backward political systems. Many of them, such as Italy and Germany, were not even united and suffered from many economic restrictions.
The author has divided the book into sisteen chapters:
1. Britain's Revolution
2. New Causes
3. The Industrial Revolution in Western Society
4. The Social Impact of the Industrial Revolution
5. The Industrial Revolution Outside the West
Part Two The Second Phase, 1880--1950 The New International Cast
6. The Industrial Revolution Changes Stripes, 1880--1950
7. The Industrial Revolution in Russia
8. The Industrial Revolution in Japan
9. New Developments in Western Societies: A Second Revolution?
10. The Industrial Revolution in International Context Part Three The Third Phase, 1950s--2000s The Industrialization of the World
11. The Industrial Revolution in the Past Half Century
12. New Industrial Revolutions
13. The Less Industrial World
14. Postindustrial Societies and Global Balance
15. Global Industry and the Environment
16. Globalization and Global Industrial Societies 1880--1950 17
The author shows that political, economic and intellectual conditions would all contribute to Britain’s revolution in industry. But at the heart of the revolution was her use of energy. Coal was the fuel which kick-started the Industrial Revolution and Britain was very fortunate to have plenty that could be easily mined. Wood had been the main source of energy in Britain, used for fuel in homes and small industries. Coal was a much more potent form of power, providing up to three times more energy than wood. Britain had an advantage over other European countries because its mines were near the sea, so ships could carry coal cheaply to the most important market-London.
The first commercially successful steam engine was the atmospheric engine, invented by Thomas Newcomen in 1712. His machine burnt tons of coal, so its location was limited to pitheads where coal was virtually free. But Britain now had seemingly inexhaustible quantities of cheap energy. Newcomer and other inventors benefitted from the intellectual climate. Britain was characterised by the free expression of new ideas. Over the previous 100 years, a cascade of scientific breakthroughs had swept across the country. There was a prolific exchange of scientific and technological ideas. And Britain, unlike many European countries, did not suffer censorship by Church or state. Men of action and men of ideas, industrialists and scientists often from very different backgrounds met to share their ideas and observations, in what was to be called the Industrial Enlightenment. They unleashed a wave of free thinking and creativity.
Britain also had the right political background for free market capitalism.
The system of parliamentary government that followed the Glorious Revolution of 1688-9 provided the background for stable investment and for a basis of taxation favourable to economic expansion. By the 18th Century the British parliament had won much greater independence from its monarch than any other European great power. Parliament passed the laws and controlled expenditure. This helped to guarantee political stability and that encouraged the pursuit of scientific breakthroughs as people set-up businesses and sought to make profit. France, by contrast, was home to some of the finest scientific minds, but had an absolute monarchy which wielded grand control over economic and political life. Political stability was underpinned by Britain's growing status as a world power. Naval power and imperial possessions enabled Britain to dictate trans-oceanic trade and to profit hence. Entrepreneurship was at the core of economic success in the colonies. Merchants could invest money and take profit as they wanted, with inadequate government intrusion.
The author in his afterword to the book prophetically avers: Britain's importance for world history rests on three elements: The Industrial Revolution, along with the imperial power and the development of political liberties which helped bring it about.
An exceptional read!!! I advocate it decidedly for students and researchers alike.