General Origins and Use of Method - Looking for a decent read about the origins of the scientific method and its application, particularly the ways it is similar and different from Logic (see my review of Priest’s "Logic: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)"), I happened upon Bauer’s book. Since science really came of age during and proceeded from the 1600’s but had its antecedents in ancient Greece, this offering seemed to be one that would be along the lines I was seeking.
From beginning of her Preface, Bauer asserts that her “Story” is not a history of science, but rather a guide to significant science writing. She claims each part presents a chronological series of “great books” in science related to important discoveries and/or how we think about science.
After this rationale, the author proceeds along her path through Five Parts. Part I – Beginnings, concerns the observances, questions and ideas out of which science originated. Part II – Birth of the Method, presents the how and why the scientific approach arose. The other parts, Part III – Reading the Earth, Part IV – Reading Life and Part V – Reading the Cosmos, deal with the way the scientific method came to be applied in the respective areas of what have become geology, biology, physics and astronomy (see my review of Brockman's "Know This: Today's Most Interesting and Important Scientific Ideas, Discoveries, and Developments" for an update).
Among the more well know or recognizable writings addressed or referred to range from Aristotle’s “Physics” (330 BCE) and Lucretius’ “On the Nature of Things” (60 BCE) to Francis Bacon’s “Novum Organum” (1620) to Hutton’s “Theory of the Earth” (1785), Darwin’s “Origin of Species” (1858), Plank’s “Origin and Development of Quantum Theory” and Weinberg’s “First Three Minutes A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe (1977).
My favorite aspects are the introductions of Parts I and II and the lesser know writings that point to differences in the thinking of the ancients and the more ‘modern’ thinking that arose. For instance, Bauer writes (on pgs. 3-4) “[The Greeks] lived in a world of solids and gods . . . solids surrounded . . . But what composed them . . . The divine suffused and guided the natural order.” She continues later (on pg. 17) “. . . only Aristotle’s point of view makes empirical inquiry----the observation and understanding of the physical world----a true path to real knowledge, valuable knowledge [possible]. Platonic thought, always casting the physical world as inferior to the Ideal, inevitably devalued scientific study . . .” Transposing Bauer a bit in a later passage (from pg. 32) “While Plato taught of Ideal forms . . . Aristotle investigated change . . . Archimedes calculated. . . the atomists continued to insist that physical reality is made up than nothing more than indivisible particles . . .”(see my review of Rovelli's "Reality Is Not What It Seems: The Journey to Quantum Gravity"). Also, of interest are Bauer’s remarks on the liberal arts of the trivium and quadrivium (on pg. 42).
Although helpful and compelling in many respects the book did not help as much as I had hoped in ascertaining the way the scientific method branched off from logic. Bauer does relate (on pg. 58) how with his notions of “Hypothesis, experiment, conclusion: Bacon had . . . traced the outlines of the scientific method.” She goes on (on pg. 87) that Bacon had laid the foundation for the modern scientific method, but Boyles’ use of instrumentation and helps truly brought the experimental phase of modern science into being.” The author later cites Hooke’s “Micrographia” (on pg. 92) to highlight his view that “It was not enough to merely to extend the senses by way of instruments; reason must follow the path laid out by these observations, interpret them, then check again.” While less explicit, it seems that the difference with logic seems to be science’s emphasis on the experimental and the laboratory that continued to unfold (see also my review of McNeely and Wolverton's "Reinventing Knowledge: From Alexandria to the Internet").
Despite my interest in further background on method, the book has much to recommend it for most seeking a decent introduction to the general origins and use of the science along with some significant writings related to its progression.