What do you think?
Rate this book
Captain America and the Crusade against Evil: The Dilemma of Zealous Nationalism
As immediate and relevant as today's headlines, this book sets forth a bold argument with direct implications for political life in America and around the world. Combining incisive cultural analysis and keen religious insight, Robert Jewett and John Shelton Lawrence maintain that American crusading -- so powerfully embodied in popular entertainments -- has striking parallels with Islamic jihad and Israeli militancy.
According to Jewett and Lawrence, American civil religion has both a humane, constitutional tradition and a violent strand that is now coming to the fore. The crusade to rid the world of evil and "evildoers" derives from the same biblical tradition of zealous warfare and nationalism that spawns Islamic and Israeli radicalism. In America, where this tradition has been popularized by superheroic entertainments, the idea of zealous war is infused with a distinctive sense of mission that draws on secular and religious images. These crusading ideals are visible in such events as the settling of the western frontier, the World Wars, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and America's present war on terrorism.
In exploring the tradition of zealous nationalism , which seeks to redeem the world by destroying enemies, the authors provide a fascinating access to the inner workings of the American psyche. They analyze the phenomenon of zeal -- the term itself is the biblical and cultural counterpart of the Islamic concept of jihad -- and address such consequential topics as the conspiracy theory of evil, the problem of stereotyping enemies, the mystique of violence, the obsession with victory, and the worship of national symbols such as flags.
This critical book, however, is also immensely constructive. As Jewett and Lawrence point out, the same biblical tradition that allows for crusading mentalities also contains a critique of zealous warfare and a profound vision of impartial justice. This tradition of prophetic realism derives from the humane side of the biblical heritage, and the authors trace its manifestations within the American experience, including its supreme embodiment in Abraham Lincoln. Isaiah's "swords into plowshares" image is carved on the walls of the United Nations building, thus standing at the center of a globally focused civil religion. Grasping this vision honored by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam alike includes recognizing the dangers of zealous violence, the illusions of current crusading, and the promise of peaceful coexistence under international law.
Instructive, relevant, and urgent, Captain America and the Crusade against Evil is sure to provoke much soul-searching and wide debate.
According to Jewett and Lawrence, American civil religion has both a humane, constitutional tradition and a violent strand that is now coming to the fore. The crusade to rid the world of evil and "evildoers" derives from the same biblical tradition of zealous warfare and nationalism that spawns Islamic and Israeli radicalism. In America, where this tradition has been popularized by superheroic entertainments, the idea of zealous war is infused with a distinctive sense of mission that draws on secular and religious images. These crusading ideals are visible in such events as the settling of the western frontier, the World Wars, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and America's present war on terrorism.
In exploring the tradition of zealous nationalism , which seeks to redeem the world by destroying enemies, the authors provide a fascinating access to the inner workings of the American psyche. They analyze the phenomenon of zeal -- the term itself is the biblical and cultural counterpart of the Islamic concept of jihad -- and address such consequential topics as the conspiracy theory of evil, the problem of stereotyping enemies, the mystique of violence, the obsession with victory, and the worship of national symbols such as flags.
This critical book, however, is also immensely constructive. As Jewett and Lawrence point out, the same biblical tradition that allows for crusading mentalities also contains a critique of zealous warfare and a profound vision of impartial justice. This tradition of prophetic realism derives from the humane side of the biblical heritage, and the authors trace its manifestations within the American experience, including its supreme embodiment in Abraham Lincoln. Isaiah's "swords into plowshares" image is carved on the walls of the United Nations building, thus standing at the center of a globally focused civil religion. Grasping this vision honored by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam alike includes recognizing the dangers of zealous violence, the illusions of current crusading, and the promise of peaceful coexistence under international law.
Instructive, relevant, and urgent, Captain America and the Crusade against Evil is sure to provoke much soul-searching and wide debate.
412 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1973
5 people are currently reading
106 people want to read
About the author
Robert Jewett
34 books7 followersRobert Jewett taught for 20 years at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary, and is currently a Guest Professor of New Testament at the University of Heidelberg, Germany. He is the author of Mission and Menace: Four Centuries of American Religious Zeal, and is Theologian in Residence at St. Mark's Methodist Church in Lincoln, Nebraska.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
January 27, 2012
This book is fascinating for those who are interested in the superhero aesthetic. This examination of American mono-myth is at once both fascinating and eye opening. I recommend this book for those who are interested in examining superheros from an intellectual viewpoint.
January 21, 2021
This book, even thought it spends many pages analyzing American involvement in Indochina (it was published in 1973, so the Vietnam War is still going on), is somewhat relevant for understanding our American predicament today. Jewett's interpretation of the bible as books comprised by a divided priestly caste that alternated between what he calls " Prophetic realism"(a kind of realpolitik of religious vision) and Zealous Nationalism"(a dogmatic, uncompromising view of good guys vs bad guys where the bad guys are all demonic agents and the good guys are working on behalf of the Lord) was a view that someone like me who lived for decades in Evangelical circles had never before come across; although I did know that Revelation had come out of a very Jewish Apocalyptic tradition that we in the West had no understanding of, and although I did know that the book of Daniel was actually written well after the period in which the main character of the book was supposed to have lived, I didn't understand how the writers of both books were steeped in Zealous Nationalism--or a similar mindset--and so this part of Jewett's thesis was very intriguing to me and actually made quite a bit of sense as far as how these books fit together within a particular tradition and worldview. That these books sit within the same canon with others that take the opposite tack also explains many of the contradictions within said canon.
Jewett argues that both of these strands are present in the USA, but that the dominant voice is that of Zealous Nationalism, which tends to create a national psychosis whenever its entertained by those working in political institutions. Jewett also sees Zealous Nationalism as a way that the Puritans saw the world and that this tradition, while tending more towards the secular, still holds great pull in our country.
I'm not sure where, but I recently read an article that traced the rise of the religious imagery of the Rapture and Great Tribulation through presidents from Richard Nixon onwards, so yeah, Jewett's argument made sense to me in this respect.
Jewett sees the enemy of the Zealous Nationalist as the outsider (immigrant, Native American, Communist countries, etc). While the goal of said nationalist is to restore peace and prosperity, this can only happen through massive bloodletting.
The Captain America aspect of Jewett's thesis is that the narrative of the ZN is fueled by conspiracy theories that can only be overcome by righteous, superhuman characters who are fully devoted to the cause of justice; however, these folks will need to operate outside of the rule of law because the rule of law (which would be something hammered out by the Prophetic Realist side) doesn't understand the insidious tenacity of the evildoer.
As I read, I began to think more and more that the capacity to hold the ZN view is pretty much within every human being's ability and that it's more or less our natural default mode. Jewett seems to think that Americans are so gullible as to be guilty of following the ZN narrative without having the capacity to see it for what it is--it makes us look really good fighting all of those evildoers and whatnot!
I think that the problem with America is that we have, at least following the Civil War and omitting the McCarthy scare, been able to see the evil doer as operating as a foreign country; however, in the age of Trump, the evil doer is anyone who votes for the other side, which is actually a scary thought when you stack up all of the carnage that good old American boys have created in our pursuit of a more freedom-loving world!
Now the critique. The book's thesis is based upon a binary, which is simple but always turns out to be a disappointment in that binaries lack the kind of complexity that human society builds. I wish it were as simple as saying that folks need to stop with the Zealous Nationalism narrative and get with the Prophetic Realism one, but things just aren't that simple.
Although I thought that Jewett's take on the priestly caste was interesting, I wish that he would have brought in more sources that supported his reading. Speaking of sources, the majority of Jewett's are secondary, which means that he did little archival work but instead relied on the work of others to build his argument. There's nothing wrong with this when you're writing to the masses, I suppose, but I have no idea of Jewett's depth of knowledge of Jewish thought pre and post Second temple period, and I don't know how competent he is in tracing the evolution of American political thought through the centuries. It's a compelling thesis that he's offering, but I fear that any digging will cause it to fall apart rather quickly. I mean, OK, you found a contradiction, but this should be where things start getting interesting, not where you hang your hat.
Jewett argues that both of these strands are present in the USA, but that the dominant voice is that of Zealous Nationalism, which tends to create a national psychosis whenever its entertained by those working in political institutions. Jewett also sees Zealous Nationalism as a way that the Puritans saw the world and that this tradition, while tending more towards the secular, still holds great pull in our country.
I'm not sure where, but I recently read an article that traced the rise of the religious imagery of the Rapture and Great Tribulation through presidents from Richard Nixon onwards, so yeah, Jewett's argument made sense to me in this respect.
Jewett sees the enemy of the Zealous Nationalist as the outsider (immigrant, Native American, Communist countries, etc). While the goal of said nationalist is to restore peace and prosperity, this can only happen through massive bloodletting.
The Captain America aspect of Jewett's thesis is that the narrative of the ZN is fueled by conspiracy theories that can only be overcome by righteous, superhuman characters who are fully devoted to the cause of justice; however, these folks will need to operate outside of the rule of law because the rule of law (which would be something hammered out by the Prophetic Realist side) doesn't understand the insidious tenacity of the evildoer.
As I read, I began to think more and more that the capacity to hold the ZN view is pretty much within every human being's ability and that it's more or less our natural default mode. Jewett seems to think that Americans are so gullible as to be guilty of following the ZN narrative without having the capacity to see it for what it is--it makes us look really good fighting all of those evildoers and whatnot!
I think that the problem with America is that we have, at least following the Civil War and omitting the McCarthy scare, been able to see the evil doer as operating as a foreign country; however, in the age of Trump, the evil doer is anyone who votes for the other side, which is actually a scary thought when you stack up all of the carnage that good old American boys have created in our pursuit of a more freedom-loving world!
Now the critique. The book's thesis is based upon a binary, which is simple but always turns out to be a disappointment in that binaries lack the kind of complexity that human society builds. I wish it were as simple as saying that folks need to stop with the Zealous Nationalism narrative and get with the Prophetic Realism one, but things just aren't that simple.
Although I thought that Jewett's take on the priestly caste was interesting, I wish that he would have brought in more sources that supported his reading. Speaking of sources, the majority of Jewett's are secondary, which means that he did little archival work but instead relied on the work of others to build his argument. There's nothing wrong with this when you're writing to the masses, I suppose, but I have no idea of Jewett's depth of knowledge of Jewish thought pre and post Second temple period, and I don't know how competent he is in tracing the evolution of American political thought through the centuries. It's a compelling thesis that he's offering, but I fear that any digging will cause it to fall apart rather quickly. I mean, OK, you found a contradiction, but this should be where things start getting interesting, not where you hang your hat.
April 28, 2017
This book, written in the light of the attack of 2011, provides interesting food for thought on the current political dynamics. While I don't agree with all he has to say about the biblical roots of current political trends and his interpretations of the Bible to give alternative political understandings, I did find the book as a whole to be thoughtful and thought-provoking.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews