The first three chapters were alright, but I found myself not being able to take more than one chapter at a time.
I did not enjoy chapters four to 14 so much. There was a period that I couldn’t even pick the book up. I guess it’s mainly due to my expectations.
I read Al-Muhaddithat a few years ago, and I found the ladies inspiring as they were known as teachers during their time. Sheikh Akram Nadwi told us about how their parents, especially fathers, made sure that the ladies had good education, even accompanying them to cities hundreds of miles away from home to study from other teachers (male and female alike).
He told us about the number of students each female scholar had, how they came from all backgrounds, male and female, about their compassion, their generosity, and their drive to deliver the best to their students.
However, the middle chapters of the History of Islam mainly talks about family feuds and dramas, about politics and power, which I’m really not interested with. Maybe I read them wrongly.
There are many aspects of the middle chapters that I could not comment on because I don’t have much knowledge of the era. I’m thinking perhaps it was my ignorance, and the angle of the history that I was not interested with, that I almost gave the book up until I reached chapter 15.
Here onwards is the best part of the book.
We learn about Nana Asmau who helped her people by educating the ladies around her (and I really respect her father who made sure she was well educated), and then Mukhlisa Bubi from Russia who was a well-educated and one of the very very very few people that I would describe as a true feminist, Helide Edib who fought for women through her writing, Umm Kulthum raising the spirit of the Arabs after the six-day war in 1967 through her voice, Zaha Hadid, the highly educated, extremely creative lady who fought her way through a male-dominated field of architecture, and Maryam Mirzakhani, a mathematic genius of our time.
One very prominent thing that I do not understand is that he said Malaysia does not uphold women’s rights until the year 2010. I don’t know on what aspect of women’s rights is he talking about. In terms of education, I’m very sure that he’s completely wrong. Even our ex-deputy prime minister, Dr Wan Azizah was educated overseas in the 1970s with Malaysian government scholarship. I just witnessed an online conference in which almost 80% of the speakers were female aged more than 35, who are experts in their own fields. I can tell you about a government health centre that is totally run by women who were educated way before the year 2010. We know many successful businesswomen who started their businesses way before 2010. There are many university courses that has more than 80% female attendance.
Divorce have recently made easier so that the women would not need to wait years to have the process concluded.
Of course, there are fields that still need much improvement in terms of women’s rights, like how domestic abuse is handled by the law enforcement officers in this country. There is always something to improve in terms of women’s rights, in any countries, but to say that Malaysian women only had their rights recently is totally unfair.