Contains a passable theory on the JFK assassination, but otherwise is a rambling and rather embarrassing screed on "socialism" - which term the author uses to lump together all manners of communist and/or authoritarian regimes -for the 2020s.
Example:
"Soon after the Soviet bloc collapsed, researchers at Germany's Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in the now liberated Lepzig discovered a genetic factor, the A1 mutation, which affects the ability to learn from past mistakes. On April 12, 2003, thousands of Americans, presumably infected by the A1 mutation, began sermonizing that capitalism was America's real enemy and that it should be replaced with socialism by redistributing the country's wealth. Quite a few young Americans cheered. They were, of course, galvanized by the prospect that a Democratic administration would force rich Americans to pay for young people's own health care, mortgages, loans, and school tuition."
I mean, wtf? It's like they're reaching hard to throw out (un-funny) barbs that have nothing to do with the general story line, and that will immediately and totally discredit everything else that was written.
Then there's other ludicrous lines like:
"Over four thousand Americans died In Iraq because we did not have a top Iraqi source to tell us that Saddam Hussein did not have nuclear weapons."
Really? We need to have a source in place to disprove every wild theory? The problem couldn't possibly be acting decisively in the absence of proper evidence?
In particular, Pacepa seems to have led an unstoried existence for most of the decades after he defected to the west, continually flailing for relevance... he probably should have stopped writing books after Red Horizons.