Reading the letters of a great writer (or composer, or artist) always feels a tad voyeuristic, but it can also yield remarkable insights into the character of the author. Mozart’s letters, for example, helped me to appreciate his work as something more than just Rococo fluff. Similarly, reading John Cage’s letters clarified many things about who he was as a person. Considering how openly autobiographical James Merrill’s poetry is, the letters don’t really tell us a lot we don’t already know from his poetry or his fiction. Instead they confirm what we already know (or suspect) about him. He grows up from being a bright, privileged kid to being a bright, privileged adult. That privilege - as the son of one of the founders of Merrill Chase - is really never questioned, and so places Merrill curiously to one side of the discussion about identity, race, colonialism, etc. that dominated so much art and literature in the 80s and 90s. He’s curiously modest about his erudition (he speaks French and Greek fluently, and is familiar with both the classics of literature and young contemporary poets, after being a judge for the Yale Poetry series for years). He’s also clearly kind and generous with his friends: many letters say “enclosed is a check.” What’s most hair-raising here are some of the transitions in relationships. Compare, for ex., the letter to David Jackson on their 25th anniversary as a couple (24 May 78) with the letter of 16 Jan 94, where Merrill says he can’t imagine ever living in the same place as Jackson ever again. Elsewhere, he wonders whether he is bad for people, or whether he just keeps getting mixed up with the wrong people. It’s a good question: would David Jackson have been different if he didn’t have Merrill’s financial support, and actually had to work for a living? The letters about the death of Chester Kallman are equally disturbing, and one wonders if Merrill recognizes that Kallman’s downward spiral as the “muse” of a great poet (W.H. Auden) might prefigure what will happen with Jackson. Yet Merrill’s poetry continues to exude its formal glow, and when he’s good, he’s very good indeed. I heard him read in Chicago in 1985: he had the most remarkable voice, and I always try to imagine that voice reading his words. These letters will place him in my ear for a long time to come.