Isn't the cover supposed to, like... represent the book? And by represent I don't mean catch readers, I mean I can look at the cover and have a fair idea of what to expect, right? Disheveled lady in a dress, probably draped over some muscled guy? Historical romance. A guy without a shirt (and maybe without his face visible? which is, yes, objectifying)? Contemporary romance! Spaceships? Sci-fi.
What is that guy doing on a magical world book? I realize this has a fated mates trope but really, until a certain point, it was such a solid, respectable almost-urban-fantasy. Which, if you don't know, I adore and respect. And yes, I guess later it, it was weird and not that smooth and the romance, well, the relationship was suffering the natural effects of trying to accept the fact some guy is supposed to be your soulmate and you need him to work your magic and yet you literary and figuratively don't know anything about him.
In a way, I liked the whole idea of anchors. I did consider this concept before - great for romance - cause someone is a really powerful individual yet they are pretty much useless without that one person to spark their magic.
And I was in a weird mood but was actually really enjoying and gaining respect for the book... until... well, I still do like this and will probably continue exploring this author thought 60 books?!?!? Sorry, but I have little faith in authors with that many. It means they wrote and published more than 1 or 2 books a year and... I may complain, fake complain, when I have to wait a whole freaking year for another book but that is actually just the reasonable amount and if you go from this premise, spending less time on a book just seems like it should not produce the same results. Unless you're someone like mad-skillz Cole McCade but is that really the case here?
I am not sure and right now, I'd say this may become a solid 3/4 stars line strander. Some stuff seems really good, some just average, some just plain... let's not smear the issue.
Even the romance aspect was just that - a part of the book and I was surprised when the whole "catching the bad guy" took such a back seat, because I like a certain balance in my mixed genres romances (like detective romance or fantasy romance) and this was good... until it wasn't.
Especially the end felt hurried and... fake? Like, HEA on speed? And really, consistency is actually nice and if I was supposed to compare the MC - love interest? At the beginning and at the end... I just have to moan (and not in a good way) at those personality transplants. Love is great, love can be transformative, love is powerful as motive, as an emotion... if you actually are convinced "This Is It", which is really hard to pull of in a book that takes place over not even a week and in that week, some... stuff... let's say shotgun wedding seems slow and drawn-out, compared to that.
Having said that, I am not yet discounting the authors has talent and while she does seem to have a surprising/suspicious number of books with threesomes and mpreg, I do recommend this book and will try to find out just how good she is.
-------
Update: I will try it, once I got over the fact this is pretty much the nicest cover out there. And it was already not that interesting. Because I am not sure who or what is picking up the rest but if I was going by my rule or "if you don't have the good taste to get a good cover, you probably don't have the writing skills to interest in me in what is inside it", I would absolutely did not give her books a second glance. The web address of her web says it all and I am not sure her type of books are for me but... well, guess I'll see.