Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Actual Causality

Rate this book
A new approach for defining causality and such related notions as degree of responsibility, degrees of blame, and causal explanation.

Causality plays a central role in the way people structure the world; we constantly seek causal explanations for our observations. But what does it even mean that an event C "actually caused" event E? The problem of defining actual causation goes beyond mere philosophical speculation. For example, in many legal arguments, it is precisely what needs to be established in order to determine responsibility. The philosophy literature has been struggling with the problem of defining causality since Hume.

In this book, Joseph Halpern explores actual causality, and such related notions as degree of responsibility, degree of blame, and causal explanation. The goal is to arrive at a definition of causality that matches our natural language usage and is helpful, for example, to a jury deciding a legal case, a programmer looking for the line of code that cause some software to fail, or an economist trying to determine whether austerity caused a subsequent depression.

Halpern applies and expands an approach to causality that he and Judea Pearl developed, based on structural equations. He carefully formulates a definition of causality, and building on this, defines degree of responsibility, degree of blame, and causal explanation. He concludes by discussing how these ideas can be applied to such practical problems as accountability and program verification. Technical details are generally confined to the final section of each chapter and can be skipped by non-mathematical readers.

212 pages, HTML

Published January 1, 2016

6 people are currently reading
85 people want to read

About the author

Joseph Y. Halpern

8 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (23%)
4 stars
2 (15%)
3 stars
4 (30%)
2 stars
3 (23%)
1 star
1 (7%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
21 reviews
September 5, 2021
This felt like examples contrived to align with common sense. Much too much.
Profile Image for Zhijing Jin.
347 reviews63 followers
August 31, 2024
Interesting read! It's definitely one of the foundational works in causality.

I wonder if the causal graphs, when they express logical relations could be more lucid if using electric circuit graphs, showing the AND, OR, NOT, etc relations by first sight.
Profile Image for Juliana Knot.
37 reviews2 followers
Read
August 7, 2025
Summer reading. Will need to return to, in order to review proofs
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.