The story has many enjoyable scenes and some interesting ideas, and could be pretty good with improved editing/proof reading I think. I particularly liked Bingley’s confrontation with Darcy, and in general the improvement of the Bennet ladies. Lady C, Mr Collins, and Miss Bingley are all comically ridiculous, which is quite fun. As it stands, the number and frequency of mistakes in the text make it difficult to concentrate on the plot.
It needs to be cut down somewhat and some passages need clarification, as the meaning isn’t always obvious. Scenes from the original are slotted in verbatim throughout, which sometimes works well and sometimes is awkward or even wrong (“she is about Miss Elizabeth Bennet’s height”). There are quite a few ettiquette errors, a number of spelling mistakes, and frequent use of Americanisms/anachronistic language. Many of the naming mistakes, usually for original characters (Lady H becomes Miss H halfway, or Smyth/Smith eg), happen within the same sentence.
There is much confusion, and I think some errors, in the backstory to Lizzy’s title, which detracted from the story for me. Almost no explanation is given in the first 25% of the novel and as her husband is the second son of an Earl it’s all very confusing. When the explanations are given, they are questionable.
Firstly I don’t think she is entitled to the title (willing to be corrected). Her title derives via her husband, who was said to be heir to an earldom due to being adopted by his maternal uncle the Earl of Bailey. First Elizabeth’s husband dies, then the Earl of Bailey dies, so the title passes to Elizabeth’s baby son Matthew. Elizabeth is never referred to as a Viscountess and it’s is not until the end that we learn her husband was a Viscount, but she is referred to often as the Countess of Bailey. As her husband died before becoming Earl, she was never a Countess (wife of an Earl) - she is the mother of an Earl. I am dubious that she was a Viscountess either for a few reasons. Hereditary titles cannot be inherited by adopted children. They can be inherited via the maternal line (though rare), but a nephew would be heir presumptive not heir apparent, and thus unlikely to be given the use of the courtesy title belonging to the earldom. And who would let a Viscount, heir to an earldom go off to die in a war?!
Secondly, no one knew her husband as a Viscount. So even if Lizzy was entitled to the title of Lady H, there is is confusion over her address because it is all supposed to be a secret. At the start Lady Mary needs to have the inheritance explained to her, and it is definitely unknown to the Bennets as later there is a “big reveal” scene with Jane. So if they all think Lizzy was married to a Mr, why would they call her Lady?! And how do they explain the Hamilton surname (her husbands maternal surname) if no one knows he is adopted/the Earl’s heir?
The titled backstory could, IMO, be easily and simply explained by the fact that Lizzy’s son inherited after his grand-uncle’s death. Lizzy is well connected as the mother of an Earl and the daughter in law of an Earl, but is still Mrs Hamilton herself. They would only need to keep her son’s inheritance secret, and could use the same justification about Mr Bennet’s absence. If her husbands family were not much discussed or known about in Meryton, especially as he died so soon after the wedding, it would be quite possible that Darcy and the Bingleys wouldn’t know of her connections - and it even allow Mrs F’s mean gossip to seem plausible. Which obvs is the point of tying the storyline up in knots in the first place. None of the important plot points are lost, but we cut out a significant amount of filler/confusion.