I wanted to like this book, but it had too many problems.
The biggest was a logic problem that shifted as the book went on. The premise of the book is that when each person is born, they are assigned a guardian angel. We'll get back to this in a little bit.
The book starts with Riley, the titular character of the series, and his new bride, Allison. As they leave the wedding reception for their honeymoon, we find that Allison's guardian angel, Jonathan, is also in the car with them. So far, so good. At the end of the first scene, they are in an accident.
Allison dies, and because of not well-explained circumstances, Jonathan has to decide whether to take Allison to heaven (she can apparently find her way there on her own), or become a fallen angel to protect Riley from attacks by the forces of hell. Apparently choosing to fall is a rare thing, but is what Jonathan decides to do, becoming an immensely powerful 'human' instead of this hidden angelic being.
This was where my What? moment came. Where's Riley's guardian angel if everyone gets one? That finally gets explained (it seems as an add-in to answer that question) in Chapter 8.
At the point of holy matrimony, the groom's guardian angel leaves to become some new baby's guardian angel while the bride's angel is now guardian for both of them as the two became one.
Okay, that makes sense, except that back at Chapter 1, after the marriage, Jonathan specifically thought only of being Allison's guardian, but was happy she married a fine guy like Riley.
The other part of this logic problem is that if Jonathan is also Riley's guardian angel, there was no reason for him to have to fall and protect Riley as a physical being. I'm sure that with some thought given, there could be logical reasoning behind that Kelly could edit into the early chapters, but right now, suspension of disbelief is broken by inconsistent logic within the book.
Other than that, the story isn't all that bad. There are lacking here, though. It needs an editor, or a better one. I'm thinking there was one from the publisher, but they gave lip service to the term edit, especially toward the end. Just the fact they didn't catch the major logic problem with Jonathan is enough to warn me away from that publisher.
There is a second book in the series, though I'm not sure I'd want to read it. I'm not expecting more logic problems, but I'm concerned about the lack of editing prowess by the publisher.