2023 update: So I was far less harsh on this initially than I should have been. This basically has nothing going for it that isn't completely ruined by the ending, and the portrayal of sexual violence really is completely tasteless, pointless and disgusting, totally unjustified by the text itself other than as shock value that is genuinely harmful. I would recommend this to absolutely no one.
Old review:
(I'll preface this quickly by saying that this story and its strengths and weaknesses from my perspective are really difficult to talk about without spoiling the entire thing, so if you don't want this to be completely ruined I would skip over this review until you read it. HOWEVER, I also highly caution with reading it in general because the ultimate subject matter could end up being triggering to many of those sensitive to sexual violence. Discretion highly advised.)
While I can't object to enjoying this story on a visceral level, I can't help but feel strongly that thinking about this after the fact leaves a sour taste in my mouth. C.K. Walker has all the right pieces in place - skilled chops at narrative tension and release, convincing and rounded characterization (especially for the three youthful leads), excellent use of clever foreshadowing, and a strong narrative voice that is somewhat beige and angsty but completely makes sense from the perspective of an adolescent. Tie that all up with a story of the depths of human depravity nested in the disguise of a horror tale about small-town evil and this should by all means be a clear cut hit.
But it's in this gut wrenching climax, where the curtain is pulled back and the true source of Drisking's horror is revealed, that the story at once reaches an undeniable narrative plateau yet also delivers something that is at best well-intentioned yet misguided and at worst radically tone-deaf. Yes, the ultimate horror of "Borrasca" is one of systemized sexual violence - the disappearance of the young girls that has plagued Drisking for years is attributed to a billionaire-funded operation that keeps them enslaved to breed "pure" children. All the gestures at supernaturalism are rendered in hindsight as red herrings, diversions from the more grounded evil that is really occurring. It is a horrific shock and a kick to the gut, one I can't deny is the mark of a writer skilled at narrative particularly.
But...to what ends is all this portrayed, exactly? It should go without saying that sexual violence is one of the weightiest topics one can engage with when constructing a work of art, and it's one that needs to be handled with grace lest it have tangible real-world consequences to those effected. "Borrasca" eschews this almost entirely, instead opting to frame its climax as a "shocking twist", one that twists the knife in and causes as much pain as possible. This is a 101 course on how NOT to handle sexual assault and human trafficking in media, because in light of this unfortunate framing choice the story ends up reducing trauma to pure plot, in the form of shock-for-shock's-sake.
This isn't to say I give no credit whatsoever to C.K. Walker - she's clearly trying to say something here, especially how this operation is one directly funded by rich men in power, making it evident that the author understands that this kind of violence is institutionalized first and foremost. But by illustrating this twist in such a shocking, callous, and horrible way, she leaves no room for readers effected by this kind of trauma anything other than horror. It's not helped by the fact that the story hinges on this as the plot twist/"big reveal", so people going into this will likely want to go in completely without knowledge and then unexpectedly be blindsided by a careless portrayal of trauma that daily effects real people tangibly.
And it's not like everything must have a happy ending, far from it, and it is a sobering and horrifying fact that many who abuse and enslave others for nothing more than profit motive and desire to dominate will often get away unjudged and unscathed. But in the 2020s, are stories like this really necessary? We, and far from least of all survivors of the crimes portrayed in "Borrasca", understand full well the breadth of systemized brutality toward women and girls, and you can portray a story like this, absolutely, but in the end what it says MUST amount to more than "horrific depiction of brutal sexual assault without catharsis for the purpose of a twist - the end". If you don't, it has failed as a piece of commentary, as a piece of literature, and even as a piece of horror.
In the end this is a story that, while containing merit on the part of its tightly-constructed narrative, can and probably has harmed many of the people who've encountered it, and we can do better than enable its callous marketing for the sake of "remaining unspoiled". If you are a survivor of SA and achieved catharsis out of this story - I can and will not take that away from you, and of course most of our greatest experiences with art are in the individual. But I do not think it will be the reaction most people have, for I think the way this story is handled is generally not conducive to discussion or analyses about institutional violence and sexual trauma as the result of a story which, in its context and framing, feels far too close to exploitation.