Gail Carriger's The Heroine's Journey is delightful to read both in her analysis of the differences between the classic Hero's Journey and the Heroine's Journey and in her explanation of why we don't recognize the Heroine Journey as a classic form.
Carriger writes both for reader/viewer/listeners as well as for writers to recognize the different "chassis" of story building.
She clearly delineates the concept of the gendered narrative as men, women, and non-binary beings can be either heroes or heroines, depending on how they define and approach their goals. She provides excellent examples of each from popular books and movies, as well as literary references in a very readable (may I say a bit snarky) style, much as she does in her novels. The reference page is a hoot.
I find her explanation helpful on my own work-in-progress as a heroine's journey, and in recognizing the structures of stories as I binge-watch streaming media.
For example, I've been watching the 60s TV western "The Virginian," about a nameless trail boss/ranch foreman, played by James Drury, whose first aim is always to get people work out differences, to keep peace, to protect his boss, employees, and cattle, and to avoid bloodshed. I see The Virginian on a Heroine's Journey despite his being a cis white het male, because he always tries networking, delegating by skills, and communication to solve the problems. When his efforts don't work, he is sometimes forced to kill in self-defense a toxic, tragic hero-wannabe--even a few friends who just won't listen to him. Due to the requirements of the genre (serial love interests), he also never gets the girl, but always sends her on her way to better things by her own choice, or he buries her. But he always goes back to his "family" in the bunkhouse, the big house, and the town. Not all the episodes follow this pattern, but many of the ones that feature the Virginian do.
If you write, READ THIS BOOK. If you watch as much TV as I do, READ THIS BOOK, and you'll never see stories the same way.