Confederates After The War
Steven M. Hood's recent book "Patriots Twice: Former Confederates and the Building of America after the Civil War" (2020) manages to be both timely and contrarian. A distant relative of Confederate General John Bell Hood, the author has written two books in partial rehabilitation of this Confederate general whose leadership, particularly as commander of the Army of Tennessee late in the War, has been sharply criticized by most historians.
"Patriots Twice" examines the lives of over 200 former Confederates of varying ranks to show how they attained positions of high responsibility and trust following the Civil War. The service of these individuals was not limited to positions in the Old South but instead spread across the reunited Union. As Hood shows, former Confederates were appointed to high positions within the Federal government, including positions as Justices of the Supreme Court and generals in the Spanish-American War. They were elected to governorships and local positions of responsibility in several states outside the former Confederacy. Former Confederates went on to lives of accomplishment in law, medicine, the academy, and business. Some served as presidents of professional organizations such as the American Medical Association and the American Bar Association while others were active in the founding of universities and other institutions of learning and of public service.
This is an important history to tell and it probably has not been studied before in the manner of this book. Hood makes his case that many former Confederates went on after the war to assume important positions of responsibility in reuniting the divided country. The discussions of each person are necessarily brief. Hood offers a brief summary of each individual's early life, the nature of his (all the characters discussed are men) Civil War service, and the positions that he occupied following the War. For the most part, Hood avoids discussing the political commitments of his subjects or the specifics of their performance in the positions they occupied after the War. The goal of the book is simply to show that these individuals became leaders working towards a united Union.
It might be valuable to provide more historical context to this study than Hood provides. After the War, there was a tension between Reconstructionists who wished to change the political and social structure of the defeated South and to protect the rights of the newly-freed people and Reconciliationists. Reconciliationists were more interested in reuiniting the former combatants, North and South, and in creating peace between the sections. Historian David Blight's 2002 book, "Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory" is among many studies that discuss the tension between the Reconstructionist and the Reconciliationist approaches. Blight and many other scholars acknowledge the need for reconciliation but they tend to be highly critical of how the rights of African Americans were ignored and pushed to the side for a century with the rise, following the end of Reconstruction, of a Jim Crow South as well as a segregated North.
Hood's book implicitly takes a reconciliationist approach to the Civil War. There is something to be said for this approach in that its critics tend to downplay the significance and difficulty of reuniting the country after four years of hard war. Still, Hood's book does not acknowledge the other side of the story -- the continued mistreatment of African Americans. His book would have been stronger with a recognition that the status of African Americans was not adequately addressed during the years of reconciliation he describes in his book. Similarly, while Hood's biographical sketches are largely free of polemic, he objects in his introductory sections to the ongoing removal of Confederate statues from public places and to the renaming of buildings and institutions and the like. Several of the people discussed in this study have been among the subjects of these efforts. The book would have been better, in my view, if the author had refrained from taking a position on these matters. It would not have impacted the content or the value of the book. Reconciliationist efforts need to continue to be made, as they apply to the broader country and the African American community. The place for historical reconciliation is in books and studies such as Hood's if not in public places.
With this criticism, Hood's story remains valuable and deserves to be told. A quotation from Robert E. Lee about the necessity for patience in following the course of history serves as an epigraph to and frames the book. Hood offers another insightful quotation from Lee in his discussion of Lee's post-war service as the president of Washington College. Lee wrote, in words that still apply: "I think it the duty of every citizen in the present condition of the Country, to do all in his power to aid in the restoration of peace and harmony."
Of the many people Hood discusses, I was most moved to learn about Moses Jacob Ezekiel, a Jewish American, a committed Confederate, and a world-class sculptor. I hadn't known anything of him before. Ezekiel designed the Confederate Monument at Arlington National Cemetery. His descendants have petitioned for the Monument's removal and relocation.
I was glad to read and learn from this book. The publisher, Savas Beatie, kindly sent me a review copy.
Robin Friedman