¿Dios conoce nuestras acciones antes de que las hagamos? Y si es así, ¿los seres humanos tienen realmente libre albedrío? El Dr. Craig sostiene que ambas nociones son compatibles, mostrando cómo la Biblia enseña el preconocimiento divino de los actos humanos libres, y revela dos maneras de «reconciliar la omnisciencia divina con la libertad humana».
William Lane Craig is Research Professor of Philosophy at Talbot School of Theology in La Mirada, California. He and his wife Jan have two grown children.
At the age of sixteen as a junior in high school, he first heard the message of the Christian gospel and yielded his life to Christ. Dr. Craig pursued his undergraduate studies at Wheaton College (B.A. 1971) and graduate studies at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (M.A. 1974; M.A. 1975), the University of Birmingham (England) (Ph.D. 1977), and the University of Munich (Germany) (D.Theol. 1984). From 1980-86 he taught Philosophy of Religion at Trinity, during which time he and Jan started their family. In 1987 they moved to Brussels, Belgium, where Dr. Craig pursued research at the University of Louvain until assuming his position at Talbot in 1994.
He has authored or edited over thirty books, including The Kalam Cosmological Argument; Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus; Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom; Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology; and God, Time and Eternity, as well as over a hundred articles in professional journals of philosophy and theology, including The Journal of Philosophy, New Testament Studies, Journal for the Study of the New Testament, American Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy, and British Journal for Philosophy of Science.
La verdad es que aunque Criag dice que es de lectura fácil, realmente no lo es, debe leerse de forma muy concentrada y conocer algunos términos para no irse perdiendo entre las líneas de este libro.
A very thorough and quite brilliant collection of arguments from WLC that particularly help in the Middle Knowledge debate.
There are not many publications which directly address anti-Molinism, but this book does a great job of defending Molinism and goes further by offering a rebuttal to John Feinsberg's anti-Molinism works.
I would love to see/read/hear WLC doing this particular strand of apologetics more regularly.