I decided to give this a shot because I usually prefer to read about history and economics through a Marxist lens, but haven't read much on Marxist philosophy. This book is relatively short and seemed like it would be a good intro. Here's what it contains:
Part 1: The Roots of Dialectical Materialism
- Gives an overview of how DM developed through history, the relationship with liberalism, and Mao's contributions to DM
Part 2: The World According to DM
- Talks about different concepts through the lens of DM, such as knowledge, war, and most importantly, the concept of principal contradiction and particular contradictions, both of which can change through time and place
Part 3: The Principal Contradiction in the World
- A sweeping summary of world history, identifying and highlighting different contradictions that have influenced key developments
Part 4: Strategy
- Short chapter talking about the importance of putting theory into practice, and how the author did this in his own organising. In his Danish communist group, they prioritised sending funds to anti-imperialist movements upon observing that there was very little revolutionary potential in Denmark at the time.
In one sense, this book was a bit of a let-down, as I'd say at most half of it is on philosophy, then the second half is modern history through a Maoist lens. I would have liked to see a bit more about the philosophy of DM, particularly how it has been criticised and defended throughout history. I don't know enough about the topics covered to judge whether the author analyses them "correctly," so I'll instead try to say to list a few more characteristics of this book, and potential readers can decide for themselves whether they want to check this out.
- Written from a Maoist lens
- Short and uses fairly accessible language.
- Covers a lot of world history pretty quickly, so I'd recommend you read other leftist history books first to get more context.
- Doesn't really address debates within Marxism or counter-arguments to its theses. In other words, the contents are presented as uncontroversial facts, when in reality different tendencies within Marxism have very different interpretations of key events (such as "was the USSR socialist?")
- Emphasises the revolutionary potential of anti-imperialist struggle in the Global South
Overall, I'd say I enjoyed the book and may come back to it from time to time to see how well its lessons hold up as I learn more from other sources.