What do you think?
Manifest Nowego Libertarianizmu
W Manifeście Nowego Libertarianizmu Samuel Edward Konkin III objaśniał, w jaki sposób – jego zdaniem – może się oddolnie wykształcić społeczeństwo libertariańskie.
Mogło to teoretycznie nastąpić w wyniku zgody społeczeństwa na zmniejszanie się wpływu państwa na ich życie w sensie personalnym, społecznym i ekonomicznym oraz przeniesienia aktywności ekonomicznych obywateli do „szarej strefy” lub na „czarny rynek” (Konkin nazywał je pokojowymi instytucjami rynkowymi), gdzie funkcjonować miały standardowe prawa wolnego rynku. W celu wyjaśnienia swojej teorii Konkin użył zwrotu kontrekonomia.
W ramach kontrekonomii Konkin wyróżnił cztery rodzaje relacji obywatela z państwem: 1) rynek biały – legalny; 2) rynek szary – czyli działania legalne, ale niesankcjonowane przez państwo; 3) rynek czarny – działania nielegalne, ale z punktu widzenia etyki libertarianizmu nieszkodliwe; 4) wreszcie rynek czerwony – działania nielegalne i szkodliwe, naruszające prawa własności i zasadę nieinicjowania agresji. Tylko ten ostatni jest według Konkina szkodliwy, a za esencję kontrekonomii uznał rynki szary i czarny – rynek biały umacnia bowiem jego zdaniem istniejący system etatystyczny.
Mogło to teoretycznie nastąpić w wyniku zgody społeczeństwa na zmniejszanie się wpływu państwa na ich życie w sensie personalnym, społecznym i ekonomicznym oraz przeniesienia aktywności ekonomicznych obywateli do „szarej strefy” lub na „czarny rynek” (Konkin nazywał je pokojowymi instytucjami rynkowymi), gdzie funkcjonować miały standardowe prawa wolnego rynku. W celu wyjaśnienia swojej teorii Konkin użył zwrotu kontrekonomia.
W ramach kontrekonomii Konkin wyróżnił cztery rodzaje relacji obywatela z państwem: 1) rynek biały – legalny; 2) rynek szary – czyli działania legalne, ale niesankcjonowane przez państwo; 3) rynek czarny – działania nielegalne, ale z punktu widzenia etyki libertarianizmu nieszkodliwe; 4) wreszcie rynek czerwony – działania nielegalne i szkodliwe, naruszające prawa własności i zasadę nieinicjowania agresji. Tylko ten ostatni jest według Konkina szkodliwy, a za esencję kontrekonomii uznał rynki szary i czarny – rynek biały umacnia bowiem jego zdaniem istniejący system etatystyczny.
111 pages, ebook
First published January 1, 1980
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 24 of 24 reviews
August 6, 2011
Agorism inspired the tattoo on my chest, as well as my personal philosophy. This book and the system of revolutionary market anarchism it promotes offer the clearest route to individual freedom I have yet discovered. This system and strategy complement Rohbardianism perfectly, and in fact seems more Rohbardian than even Murray--due primarily to Rothbard being bogged down in
Libertarian Party politics in his later years. (No disrespect intended. Rothbard will forever remain my favorite philosopher.)
Agora! Anarchy! Action!
Libertarian Party politics in his later years. (No disrespect intended. Rothbard will forever remain my favorite philosopher.)
Agora! Anarchy! Action!
May 10, 2021
Bro, if you want to evade taxes just do it. You don't need to "create" a while ideology to pretend it's something higher.
Incentivezing pirating is great. The rest is just wishful thinking
Incentivezing pirating is great. The rest is just wishful thinking
August 27, 2020
This is a wonderfully radical piece of work that I am only ashamed that I had not read sooner. Certainly there are some flaws to this piece but it is perhaps the most interesting libertarian piece on strategy I have every read. I have a few short words about each chapter.
Chapter 1: This was incredibly well written. The first two sentences echo my favourite libertarian quote of all time. Konkin writes, "We are coerced by our fellow human beings. Since they have the ability to choose to do otherwise, our condition need not be thus." Brilliant! Consider the words of Rothbard who writes, "In the field of justice, man's will is all; men can move mountains, if only men so decide. A passion for instantaneous justice — in short, a radical passion — is therefore not utopian, as would be a desire for the instant elimination of poverty or the instant transformation of everyone into a concert pianist. For instant justice could be achieved if enough people so willed." Overall, this chapter is excellent and there is almost nothing I would change.
Chapter 2: This chapter does an excellent job of describing ideal-theory libertarianism; a LeFevrian pacifist society, as well as non-ideal-theory libertarianism; a private law society operating on the basis of private property rights. One particularly interesting section in this chapter suggests that possibly (and even Konkin appears to have his reservations about it) the state would find it less profitable if libertarians were to start acting in almost random self-defense. Next time a cop tries to enter your house, fucking kill him. I love the sentiment. The state uses random violence on us (surely no drug dealer, prostitute, employer of alien labour, etc. knows if or when they will be arrested) and we should do the same to them! I think only that this asks many individuals to bear a high cost for only marginal gains for the movement.
Chapter 3: Here, while I am interested in the actual strategy proposed by Konkin, the language used is wholly confused. Konkin introduces what he calls "Counter-Economics". In brief counter economics is simply acting on the black market. Do not report income, do not report transactions, do not report any activity to the state. And this is all well and good. But Konkin contrasts this to what he calls "Establishment Economics". By establishment economics he is referring to something approximating neoclassical economics. The problem is that counter-economics is a form of normative economics, telling us how our economy should function, whereas establishment economics is a form of positive economics, telling us how people really do act in the economy. Ironically enough, it is The Establishment that now sows this confusion. Think, for example, of the idiotic "Group Economics" that the NBA (you could scarcely name a more "establishment" organization other than the state itself) has asked their players to wear on the back of their jerseys. Does the NBA expect people to begin defying natural economic laws? No! They are proposing a normative economics about how we should operate. But, no doubt, the confusion is there.
Chapter 4: I don't know how many people could get into counter economics given the high cost of operating on the black market. But I should see no reason to be against this strategy. More and more people operate outside of the state until it is more efficient to join the agora than side with the state. Even the unpaid armies will flock to us. Konkin makes clear that in pursuing the agora we can never violate the rights of others. So why be opposed to this?
Chapter 5: I don't think that having Libertarian Party is a problem. What about the division of labour?! Some of us will make good politicians to limit the evils of the state from the inside while others will become counter-economists and black market entrepreneurs.
Chapter 1: This was incredibly well written. The first two sentences echo my favourite libertarian quote of all time. Konkin writes, "We are coerced by our fellow human beings. Since they have the ability to choose to do otherwise, our condition need not be thus." Brilliant! Consider the words of Rothbard who writes, "In the field of justice, man's will is all; men can move mountains, if only men so decide. A passion for instantaneous justice — in short, a radical passion — is therefore not utopian, as would be a desire for the instant elimination of poverty or the instant transformation of everyone into a concert pianist. For instant justice could be achieved if enough people so willed." Overall, this chapter is excellent and there is almost nothing I would change.
Chapter 2: This chapter does an excellent job of describing ideal-theory libertarianism; a LeFevrian pacifist society, as well as non-ideal-theory libertarianism; a private law society operating on the basis of private property rights. One particularly interesting section in this chapter suggests that possibly (and even Konkin appears to have his reservations about it) the state would find it less profitable if libertarians were to start acting in almost random self-defense. Next time a cop tries to enter your house, fucking kill him. I love the sentiment. The state uses random violence on us (surely no drug dealer, prostitute, employer of alien labour, etc. knows if or when they will be arrested) and we should do the same to them! I think only that this asks many individuals to bear a high cost for only marginal gains for the movement.
Chapter 3: Here, while I am interested in the actual strategy proposed by Konkin, the language used is wholly confused. Konkin introduces what he calls "Counter-Economics". In brief counter economics is simply acting on the black market. Do not report income, do not report transactions, do not report any activity to the state. And this is all well and good. But Konkin contrasts this to what he calls "Establishment Economics". By establishment economics he is referring to something approximating neoclassical economics. The problem is that counter-economics is a form of normative economics, telling us how our economy should function, whereas establishment economics is a form of positive economics, telling us how people really do act in the economy. Ironically enough, it is The Establishment that now sows this confusion. Think, for example, of the idiotic "Group Economics" that the NBA (you could scarcely name a more "establishment" organization other than the state itself) has asked their players to wear on the back of their jerseys. Does the NBA expect people to begin defying natural economic laws? No! They are proposing a normative economics about how we should operate. But, no doubt, the confusion is there.
Chapter 4: I don't know how many people could get into counter economics given the high cost of operating on the black market. But I should see no reason to be against this strategy. More and more people operate outside of the state until it is more efficient to join the agora than side with the state. Even the unpaid armies will flock to us. Konkin makes clear that in pursuing the agora we can never violate the rights of others. So why be opposed to this?
Chapter 5: I don't think that having Libertarian Party is a problem. What about the division of labour?! Some of us will make good politicians to limit the evils of the state from the inside while others will become counter-economists and black market entrepreneurs.
December 19, 2017
En el top 5 de majaderías que he leído en mi vida. y he leído a Bakunin, Lenin o Hitler. Pues el mismo tono mesiánico, psicótico y cursi.
June 10, 2016
I didn't like this one very much. It was way too short to effectively argue for its ideas. The style also wasn't that great, it was the typical call-to-action that you can read in every pamphlet, not particularly bad, but also not particularly good. It isn't Common Sense.
As an alternative, I would recommend An Agorist Primer. It's at once more better presented and way better argued.
As an alternative, I would recommend An Agorist Primer. It's at once more better presented and way better argued.
August 13, 2013
A short and truthful book that will push libertarianism in the right direction, which is agorism, and non-statism.
June 20, 2016
This book contains some extremely interesting ideas relating to the proper strategy for liberty. Unfortunately, Konkin's style is that of the zealot and will probably alienate the unconverted.
February 9, 2024
SEK3 paints an attractive picture of an anarchical society. A society in which the agora (the marketplace in ancient Greek polis) becomes an organic form of social organization, right after the family. Its existence is the most natural for the human community, unlike the state, whose foundation, like the corporation (a form of repulsive convergence between the state and the market), is rooted in pure violence and the victim's "consent" to it. What distinguishes "agorism" from the rest of the libertarian spectrum? - The existence of a specific, rather trivial way of its implementation. In brief, its aim is to proliferate the black (gray) market of goods and services by brining the attention of more and more market agents to it. The result of the realization of this practice will be the gradual death of the state apparatus from the increasing monetary "hunger". Of course, this manifesto is not an ideal instruction from the point of theory and practice, but it can serve as a good manual for libertarians seeking "active resistance" to state violence and lawlessness, which is acquiring new forms (Libertarian Party, Kochtopus, etc.).
May 25, 2020
Una mezcla de momentos brillantes y absurdos. Hay una fiel idea que gira en torno a la libertad y al individualismo, pero también una peligrosa y poco pragmática forma de ver la vida, que no se deslinda mucho de otras ideas autoritarias. No debe ser tomado al pie de la letra más allá de sus bases teóricas y breves reflexiones sobre el papel del individuo contra la violencia en cualquiera de sus formas.
December 16, 2020
It's certainly interesting and parts may be useful but I find it unlikely that things would go as he planned. If nothing else it's good for a backup plan or something used sparingly in times of desparation. It's more of a way to sneak around the state than to get rid of it. Also as someone that lives in the middle of nowhere I find it would be a lot harder to put this stuff in action without living in a big city where you can have your own agorist community.
August 3, 2025
Escrito en 1980. En interesante leerlo ahora para ver lo irritantemente idealista que era esa generación. Pese a su petulancia compulsiva uno no puede evitar sentir que estás leyendo el ensayo político de un niño mimado de diez años.
Aún con todo es interesante, ya que se considera un texto radical y lo que uno percibe es la falta de visión antropológica de este tipo de radicales.
Aún con todo es interesante, ya que se considera un texto radical y lo que uno percibe es la falta de visión antropológica de este tipo de radicales.
July 31, 2020
The slogan "Agora Anarchy Action" can be rephrased into "Agora=Anarchy+Action"
Konkin beautifully explains how to peacefully end the legalized theft of the masses (taxation), and thus live in a truly peaceful society.
Konkin beautifully explains how to peacefully end the legalized theft of the masses (taxation), and thus live in a truly peaceful society.
October 9, 2020
As my role model Lenin said: “So long as the state exists there is no freedom. When there is freedom, there will be no state.” Yet I can not bring myself to sympathise with this inaccurate piece of melodrama.
October 5, 2021
Работа устарела, события идут по другому маршруту. Идеи либертарианства живут, а вот практического воплощения так и не наступает. Конечно хочется избавиться от государства, но проблема с отсутствием успешных примеров, даже начального уровня
August 22, 2023
I was slightly on board after reading the first section, but per usual, 😍Rothbard🥰 brings me back down to earth. Crazy thing is the writing from Rothbard in someone else’s book is possibly the best I’ve ever seen from him
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
July 28, 2020
I thought that SEK3's philosophy was interesting and compelling. I especially like the idea that libertarians must use libertarian means to achieve libertarian ends.
June 20, 2021
Ended up listening to this on YT. It is worth repeating!
July 25, 2024
Jestem naturalną agorystką. Działania kontrekonomiczne są moją codziennością. Czy zgadzam się ze strategią Konkina? Nie. Przynajmniej nie w całości. Jest dla mnie zbyt utopijna.
July 13, 2026
Worth every second of reading
February 23, 2021
This is a very vague plan of action from Konkin, I'm glad that this was written, the best of the book is the introduction to the term "Agora", but the ideas here are general and simplistic.
The prologue written by Jesus Huerta de Soto, increases the hype to maximum levels, to finally just give something that feels like a compilation of ideas that try to move to action, but without any particular action proposed.
The prologue written by Jesus Huerta de Soto, increases the hype to maximum levels, to finally just give something that feels like a compilation of ideas that try to move to action, but without any particular action proposed.
December 20, 2020
The basic concepts of Agorism are not ones that I would agree with in whole, but Konkin's thoughts on starving the State through counter-economics have been very insightful to me. All in all, was underwhelmed with both this work and his Agorist Primer though. They were surprisingly small. Was expecting a bit more meat behind these works seeing as how they've been foundational in spawning the Agorist movement.
July 25, 2015
Básicamente un ensayo corto sobre estrategia. Para leer en una tarde, esencialmente la propuesta es la misma de otros libertarios radicales sobre una sociedad en que la justicia y la seguridad dejan de ser monopolio del estado y son servicios ofrecidos en un mercado. Como filosofía política no representa ninguna aportación, lo interesante del pequeño libro es pensar la estrategia política de forma distinta a como lo hacen las estrategias de partidos electorales, con destellos de genialidad de cómo generar una revolución - que sea irreversible y para el autor esto implica cambiar las estructuras de producción- y pensarla en fases que inclusive pueden demorar generaciones. Sin embargo, aparte de esos insights el autor no plantea algo más detallado, es una hoja de ruta demasiado genérica. Una de las partes más criticables para mí es su idea del liderazgo y organización, que es muy débil y desordenada.
September 9, 2015
En esta obra se presenta una propuesta más activa para los libertarios la cual es denominada Agorismo, se trata de actuar bajo lo que se conoce como Contra-Economía bajo los mercados negro y gris para evadir y en el largo plazo eliminar la intervención estatal, la obra es un buen aporte al movimiento libertario y anarcocapitalista.
February 26, 2023
I know it's a manifesto, so it's an entry-level text but i was expecting for more convincing and better defending of counter-economics. I've heard his other books are more theoretically sophisticated though, I'll check em out.
Displaying 1 - 24 of 24 reviews