“Winning is about ensuring that people who do not think they matter in our system believe that they can lift their voices up. For too long, politicians have treated elections as a single night of results. But as long as we make winning the only thing, when we make crossing that finish line and getting the crown the only metric, we are going to continue to lose our democracy. When winning is all that matters, how you win has less and less relevance.”
In 2018, Stacey Abrams lost the governor’s race to Republican Brian Kemp by a razor thin margin despite a myriad of very real obstacles in her way. A large one of which is that Kemp was, in a troubling and seemingly clear conflict of interest, also the Secretary of State in charge of the election he was running in.
Abrams did not immediately concede but eventually decided to not continue fighting the result (she makes it very clear that she believes the election was stolen from her but rather than litigate the result, she chose to organize groups committed to fairer elections).
While this book does make numerous references to her loss, its main focus is on the erosion of voting rights in the United States since the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Be it through the removal of polling places in minority neighborhoods, voter intimidation, overly strict voter ID laws, gerrymandering districts, disenfranchising convicted felons who have served their time, or today’s attempts to delegitimize mail-in ballots, it seems that Republicans in particular are constantly thinking of new ways to get less people voting.
Abrams does a wonderful job chronicling the history of these machinations, particularly from the time of Ronald Reagan up to the 2006 Supreme Court decision that effectively gutted the Voting Rights Act.
As someone who keenly follows this topic, I was pleasantly surprised to learn many new things from this book. Abrams, as an organizer of a number of voting rights groups is extremely knowledgeable and in addition to identifying the problem we have today, offers some concrete solutions to prevent further Republican shenanigans in upcoming elections.
I guess if I had an issue with this book however, it would be it is extremely self congratulating. There is of course nothing wrong with being proud of what you have achieved. Abrams is an extremely accomplished politician and organizer. At times however, it does seem a bit overbearing. She frequently mentions a topic, and then follows it with something she has done to make it better. The following is a good example of this:
“While my 2018 campaign for governor engaged, organized, and inspired traditional voters and brought new voices to the table…by and large, our strategy worked, with the unintended consequence of perhaps working too well”
I’m not sure how not winning the election meant your strategy was successful, much less too successful. Passages like this feel kind of like humble brags. After I while I just wanted to say, “Yup, great campaign. You don’t need to remind me every other page.”
Some of the statistics she cites are a little confusing as well. Such as:
“But in fact, our campaign achieved historically high support from white voters; overall 25 percent of white voters supported the Abrams campaign for governor.”
I read this sentence multiple times to confirm it however I’m still unclear on what she is saying here. Is she bragging that 25% percent of white voters supported her? That number seems extremely low. Is that really a historic number? I’m not sure if she’s saying that this many white people voting, against expectations that white people only vote for white people, for a black woman is historic. If so, it’s a little sad and perhaps a little presumptive on her part.
Perhaps however in light of Abrams full throated support of “identity politics”, this sentence makes more sense. If you believe different constituencies primarily view the world through the lens of that community as Abrams does, then yes, you will be surprised if 25% of white people voted for you I suppose.
I’m not a fan of identity politics and didn’t particularly find the portions of the book Abrams spent advocating for it very convincing.
Criticism aside, her critiques of voter suppression are informative and powerful and more than make up for what I thought were some of the weaker parts of the book.
Ultimately, the book falls somewhere between a guide to voter suppression and how to prevent it, and a Stacey Abrams autobiography. Both are fine, but one wishes that more focus was paid to one over the other.