The first picture I ever remember seeing of FDR was the one of him at the Yalta Conference seated with Churchill and Stalin on either side. Roosevelt was in the middle with a big cape thrown around his shoulders and looking very frail and old; much older than the other two, although he wasn’t. I don’t know why this is the one I remember; I didn’t see it in real time, but I also remember wondering why he was considered handsome. I may have seen others, but this is the one I remember. Of course I have seen and remember scads of others since, and in some of them he is handsome.
The Yalta Conference has been much written about since it took place in 1945 just on the verge of Germany’s defeat. None of the reporting or analysis took note of the western leaders’ daughters being in attendance, so far as I know. So Katz has found a new lens for looking back at the conference. There’s some but not a lot of detail about the issues and their aftermath discussed in her book. But that was a secondary subject. The book focuses on the daughters: Anna Roosevelt, Sarah Churchill, and Kathleen Harriman. Stalin did not bring any family members. Katz doesn’t argue that the daughters helped shape the policy there but that they provided crucial personal support for their fathers.
In some cases their role was mostly that of gatekeeper. This was particularly true of Anna Roosevelt. Her father had been recently diagnosed with a congestive heart condition, a condition that the always secretive Roosevelt wanted to keep a secret. Anna was one of the few people who knew and she only knew because she pried the information from her father’s doctor. In an effort to protect her father’s failing health she barred, to the extent she could, several members of his close inner circle from meeting with him. Of course they were highly irritated with her as she was with them. Whether she kept her father from learning things he should have is not entirely clear. FDR, however, was very much his own man, and he himself shut people out that he should have seen and listened to.
Sarah Churchill played less the role of a gatekeeper and more the role of a companion and sparring partner. Churchill, unlike Roosevelt, liked to hear different opinions and argue about them. Sarah, much more confident in her relationship with her father than Anna was, could do this. She was also one of the few people, aside from her mother who was not at Yalta, who could manage Churchill’s moods and temper.
Kathleen Harriman is portrayed as more of a partner to her father. They had a strong, trusting relationship and she had worked with him on a variety of projects: developing a ski resort in Sun Valley and, most importantly, working as his aide while he was the U.S. Ambassador to Russia. She taught herself a passable Russian while there and generally developed good relations with Russian officials, including Stalin. Nevertheless she knew enough not to trust him. In this way her analysis was more acute than was FDR’s. At Yalta her primary job was to assist the Russians in making the physical arrangements for the conference. No small job.
Kathleen comes across as the most self-confident and outgoing of the three. Anna, as the least, although she was by far the oldest. Both Kathleen and Sarah were secure in their family and in their relationship with their fathers, as well as on good terms with their mothers. Anna had never felt confident in her relationships with either her mother or her father. She was thrilled to be invited by her father on the Yalta trip. Previously, FDR had always taken one of his sons. Eleanor was hurt not to have been invited. FDR tried to soothe her hurt feelings by telling her that Churchill and Harriman were bringing their daughters and for him to bring his wife would have meant much more additional fuss and security for the Russians to manage. Anna knew her mother was hurt but could not bring herself to yield her place to her mother. Clementine was away on a good will trip and Harriman and his wife, although still friendly, were separated.
The three daughters were not allowed to sit in on the discussions among Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin and their closest advisers, although they were at the lavish dinners where quite a lot of discussion was carried on. Since they couldn’t attend the strategy and policy discussions, they took the opportunity to explore Yalta and surrounds. No small task because Russian guards followed them everywhere and almost all of the area had been devastated by the war. They could see how poor the people were and how much they had and were continuing to suffer as a result.
Katz explains why Yalta was such an unlikely place for the conference. It was a long trip both for Roosevelt and Churchill. Neither wanted to take such a long journey; they were exhausted from the war years and Roosevelt was very ill, as was his long time aide, Harry Hopkins. However Stalin insisted that Yalta was as far west as he would come and as with so many other things as the conference, they gave in. The main events were held at the once sumptuous place of the Tsars. Now it was in very bad disrepair. The roads to get to Yalta were tortuous and the drive took, seemingly, forever. Nevertheless all could see the enormous effort the Russians (and Kathleen) had made to accommodate everybody. The table service and linens were beautiful; they were overseen by staff from Moscow’s famed Metropol hotel. The food was something else. They were served heavy Russian food and caviar, caviar, caviar and vodka, vodka, vodka! The meals were difficult for the British and the Americans.
Katz emphasizes that it’s not surprising that the outcome of the Yalta Conference, although initially praised, soon was subject to much criticism. The three leaders had very different goals for what would happen to Europe in the aftermath of the war. Churchill fought hard for Poland’s sovereignty. After all, isn’t that why Britain entered the war in the first place? Stalin wanted retribution for his country’s crippling losses in the war. Roosevelt wanted help in ending the war in the Pacific and in created a United Nations where diplomacy could settle disputes. Parts of these goals were achieved but, as usual, Stalin bullied. Churchill resisted, but Roosevelt often sided with Stalin to the discomfort of Churchill. Roosevelt believed his personal charm could win Stalin over. (He’s not the first or the last American President who was overly confident in personal charm.)
Fortunately for Katz Anna, Sarah, and Kathleen were all prolific letter writers. She had access to much of their correspondence to each of their mothers, their siblings, their friends and, in Anna’s case, to her husband who was still fighting in the war; and, in Kathleen’s case, to her friend and her father’s friend, Pamela Churchill, who later was to become Pamela Harriman. I’m not sure that Katz was unprejudiced in her view of the three women or their fathers, although what she writes broadly supports things we already know about all of them.
I think Averell and Kathleen Harriman come of the best in most of the book. They are accomplished, secure in their own persons, and friendly and helpful to others. Very attractive characters both in their appearance and in their personalities. Sarah Churchill comes off pretty well, too. According to Katz, she tries to be helpful and friendly to Anna and seemed not to realize that Anna didn’t like her, at least not at first. She is also described as very attractive. Churchill is always Churchill – lovely and irascible and grumpy and funny. Katz seems to go out of her way to describe Anna as not that pretty but more pretty than her mother. In a completely gratuitous way she writes that Franklin, Jr. was the best looking of the Roosevelt sons and the only one with any sort of a chin.
FDR turns on several of his loyal and trusted and well qualified advisers. Katz shows him as unaccountably and undeservedly shutting out Harry Hopkins and Harriman when he could have benefitted from their advice. She also writes the only account that I have ever read which had some negative views of Hopkins. Of course, he wasn’t perfect, but I have always seen him only very highly praised for his unflagging devotion to FDR and his causes. Katz also portrays Anna as quarreling with Hopkins; she didn’t believe he was as ill as he claimed to be, although everyone else could see that he was very, very ill.
As a kind of coda to her book, she softens toward Anna Churchill. She writes a little about Anna’s and Sarah’s lives after Yalta, but scarcely anything about Kathleen’s. Kathleen outlived both of them. Evidently all three of the women looked back on Yalta as one of the most treasured times in their lives.