A WIDE RANGE OF ESSAYS ON PSYCHOLOGICAL AND METAPHYSICAL TOPICS
Nandor Fodor (1895–1964) was a Hungarian-born journalist, lawyer, psychoanalyst and psychical researcher.
He wrote in the Introduction to this 1964 book, “This book represents a lifetime of adventure and research. I would feel hard put to answer the question as to what has enthralled me most. It appears to me that in the wonders of the human mind no scale of comparison exists. Time, place and mental disposition are the decisive factors in fascination. In this volume there is enough to choose from for the most delicate taste. The reach is open from Heaven to Hell. Ample room exists for every kind of approach: the psychological, the philosophical, the psychoanalytical, and occult and the religious. I have no drums to beat, no isms to serve… I sat before the unknown, and sailed into it, for the best years of my life. I can only say that my three score and ten years have been marvelous lit up by the excitement and unceasing wonder of this quest. I have worked my way through orthodox religions, Spiritualism, psychical research to psychoanalysis, mainly in the hope of finding the missing answers. Some I have found, many more I have missed… Parapsychology… has made a significant inroad but hardly covered more than the initial part of a long journey. But, every journey begins with the first step, and the outlines of a new ultra-science are perhaps already discernible along the path… All I know is that human destiny will be profoundly affected by it and that eventually, and hopefully, we shall understand the meaning of human life.”
He says of ghosts, “Increasing knowledge of the unconscious mind of man has furnished us with some keys to this ancient mystery… Let us approach the subject by saying that the ghost is a product of the mind, conscious, or unconscious (and, perhaps, even of the impersonal unconscious—on the line of Jung’s archetypes).” (Pg. 58)
He says of telepathy, “The basic question … has been worded in a twofold manner: Is it a survival of an archaic, pre-lingual communication or is it developmental, a faculty that may be shared in the future by the majority of the race, and may even take the place of, or occasionally substitute for, normal communication?... the thought should not be ignored that telepathy may yet turn out to be the cohesive force that will hold humanity together in a far distant future.” (Pg. 72-73)
He suggests, “There is reason to suppose that every act, physical or mental, leaves an indelible record in the universe; that everything living or dead has a ghostly counterpart, the design of which was formed by the forces of the cosmos. This is the basis of the Great Memory, In the East it is called Akashic Records. In the West sometimes it is described as the Cosmic Picture Gallery. It is the Memory of the Universe or, at least, of our Planet, impersonal, beyond our comprehension, but not beyond our ability to catch glimpses of it when Nature appears to be in a ‘reminiscent’ mood, or contact it if we have the immense mental development that some people claim to have reached.” (Pg. 98)
He explains, “People engaged in the investigation of the paranormal must be prepared for everything. They are natural targets for the discharge of emotions caused by strange experiences or a psychotic attack. They must be prepared to investigate stories however odd they appear and regardless of their own reservations.” (Pg. 142)
He states, “For those who are weak to firth the battle of life on their own, Spiritualism offers a wonderful escape from reality. The spirits of the dead are always willing to guide and succor. A direct contact with them appears to be open to those who can hear voices, see, visions, or write automatically with a pencil held in a dreamy hand. They have probably no idea that they suffer from a dissociation of the personality as the result of a shock. The conscious mind is too monopolistic to allow belief in the existence of a separate mental development. The suggestion that the dissociated person is in contact with another plane of life is almost inescapable.” (Pg. 195)
Of a case he investigated of bogus ‘spirit raps,’ he comments, “Here, again, was the lesson: no phenomena should be accepted on authority. The ‘Danish Wonder’ was reputed to be one of the last great mediums! Miracle-mongering produced queer perversions of the mind. Daughters cheat their fathers and wives their husbands. Neither friendship nor social standing can guarantee authenticity.” (Pg. 249)
Of weeping Madonnas, he says, “Against the inroads of parapsychology into religious mysticism the Catholic Church used to defend itself by ascribing mediumistic phenomena to the agency of the Devil while those of the saints and religious ecstatics were claimed to be due to divine grace. Most of the phenomena were the same, only the interpretation differed. The Catholic evaluation always had the recommendation of simplicity. A miracle needs no explanation, it is self-sufficient; but it requires a religious setting and a certain magnitude of the phenomena claimed before scrutiny is granted to it. However, once accepted nothing can change the commitment. Miracles permit no compromise or alternatives…. Hence a parapsychological approach could be expected to make an impression on the Church… Attempts at reconciliation have been unthinkable.” (Pg. 264)
This book ranges very wide in its selection of topics. It will appeal to those seeking parapsychological mixed with psychological perspectives on puzzling phenomena.